"My Quality of Life is Not There. I'm Dying Here. I Cannot Take This Anymore." Exploring Patient Experiences With Surgical Wait Times in Otolaryngology: A Mixed Methods Study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Shelley Vanderhout, Shipra Taneja, Amr Hamour, Eric Monterio, Janet Chung
{"title":"\"My Quality of Life is Not There. I'm Dying Here. I Cannot Take This Anymore.\" Exploring Patient Experiences With Surgical Wait Times in Otolaryngology: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Shelley Vanderhout, Shipra Taneja, Amr Hamour, Eric Monterio, Janet Chung","doi":"10.1177/19160216251321456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundNew patient referral models are needed to reduce long wait times for otolaryngology surgical procedures, such as a Single-Entry Model (SEM). However, patient perspectives about SEM in otolaryngology remain unexplored.MethodsIn this mixed methods study, a retrospective chart review was conducted to examine the times from referral to consultation (T1) and from consent to surgery (T2) for all elective otolaryngology surgical procedures at a large community hospital between 2020 and 2023. We then conducted journey mapping interviews with 10 patients and parents of pediatric patients who underwent otolaryngologic surgeries to understand their experiences of waiting for their own or their child's procedure, and perspectives on how an SEM might impact patient experiences. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.ResultsWe identified that average wait times among 2414 elective (oncologic and non-oncologic) otolaryngology procedures often exceeded provincial target wait times. On average, oncology procedures had the shortest wait times (T1: 34 ± 47; T2: 101 ± 161 days), and otologic procedures had the longest (T1: 67 + 72; T2: 355 ± 285 days). While patients often did not wait as long to have a consultation with their surgeon, the time between consenting to and receiving surgery tended to drive wait time duration. Patients who had endured extended wait times experienced poor quality of life, worsening symptoms, and often worried about how long they would need to wait. Systems such as an SEM that could shorten wait times were generally well-perceived. However, patients emphasized the importance of trusting relationships with referring physicians and surgeons, which could be an enabling factor for implementing an SEM.ConclusionLong surgical wait times in otolaryngology are negatively impacting patients. A SEM could offer a way to improve patient experiences and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","volume":"54 ","pages":"19160216251321456"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216251321456","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundNew patient referral models are needed to reduce long wait times for otolaryngology surgical procedures, such as a Single-Entry Model (SEM). However, patient perspectives about SEM in otolaryngology remain unexplored.MethodsIn this mixed methods study, a retrospective chart review was conducted to examine the times from referral to consultation (T1) and from consent to surgery (T2) for all elective otolaryngology surgical procedures at a large community hospital between 2020 and 2023. We then conducted journey mapping interviews with 10 patients and parents of pediatric patients who underwent otolaryngologic surgeries to understand their experiences of waiting for their own or their child's procedure, and perspectives on how an SEM might impact patient experiences. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.ResultsWe identified that average wait times among 2414 elective (oncologic and non-oncologic) otolaryngology procedures often exceeded provincial target wait times. On average, oncology procedures had the shortest wait times (T1: 34 ± 47; T2: 101 ± 161 days), and otologic procedures had the longest (T1: 67 + 72; T2: 355 ± 285 days). While patients often did not wait as long to have a consultation with their surgeon, the time between consenting to and receiving surgery tended to drive wait time duration. Patients who had endured extended wait times experienced poor quality of life, worsening symptoms, and often worried about how long they would need to wait. Systems such as an SEM that could shorten wait times were generally well-perceived. However, patients emphasized the importance of trusting relationships with referring physicians and surgeons, which could be an enabling factor for implementing an SEM.ConclusionLong surgical wait times in otolaryngology are negatively impacting patients. A SEM could offer a way to improve patient experiences and outcomes.

“我的生活质量不在那里。我要死了。我再也受不了了。”探索耳鼻喉科患者手术等待时间的经验:一项混合方法研究。
背景:需要新的患者转诊模型来减少耳鼻喉外科手术的长时间等待时间,例如单入口模型(SEM)。然而,患者对耳鼻喉科扫描电镜的看法仍未得到探索。方法回顾性分析某大型社区医院2020 - 2023年所有耳鼻喉科选择性手术从转诊到会诊(T1)和从同意到手术(T2)的时间。然后,我们对10名接受耳鼻喉外科手术的儿童患者和家长进行了旅程地图访谈,以了解他们等待自己或孩子手术的经历,以及扫描电镜如何影响患者体验的观点。数据分析采用描述性统计和专题分析。结果我们发现2414例选择性(肿瘤和非肿瘤)耳鼻喉科手术的平均等待时间经常超过省级目标等待时间。平均而言,肿瘤学手术的等待时间最短(T1: 34±47;T2: 101±161天),耳科手术时间最长(T1: 67 + 72;T2: 355±285天)。虽然患者通常不会等待很长时间与他们的外科医生进行咨询,但从同意到接受手术之间的时间往往会延长等待时间。忍受长时间等待的患者生活质量较差,症状恶化,并且经常担心他们需要等待多久。像扫描电镜这样可以缩短等待时间的系统通常都很受欢迎。然而,患者强调与转诊医生和外科医生建立信任关系的重要性,这可能是实施扫描电镜的有利因素。结论耳鼻喉科手术等待时间过长对患者有不良影响。扫描电镜可以提供一种改善患者体验和结果的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing on all aspects and sub-specialties of otolaryngology-head & neck surgery, including pediatric and geriatric otolaryngology, rhinology & anterior skull base surgery, otology/neurotology, facial plastic & reconstructive surgery, head & neck oncology, and maxillofacial rehabilitation, as well as a broad range of related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信