Functional Outcome of Radial Head Fracture Treated with Open Reduction Internal Fixation using Plating Versus Herbert Screw Fixation: A Case Series.

Vinod Nair, Vishal Patil, Setu Kaneria, Harsh Kumar, Amogh Todkar, Meet Shah
{"title":"Functional Outcome of Radial Head Fracture Treated with Open Reduction Internal Fixation using Plating Versus Herbert Screw Fixation: A Case Series.","authors":"Vinod Nair, Vishal Patil, Setu Kaneria, Harsh Kumar, Amogh Todkar, Meet Shah","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i03.5398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radial head fractures can be addressed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using either plating or Herbert screw fixation. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of these two techniques.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 30 patients who underwent surgery for radial head fractures between June 2020 and July 2023. Patients were assessed using the modified Mason classification and underwent ORIF with either plating or Herbert screws.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated 30 patients with radial head fractures treated between June 2020 and July 2023, comparing outcomes between ORIF with plating versus Herbert screw fixation. The mean age was 45.45 years (standard deviation 12.74). Fractures were evenly classified as Mason type II (15 cases) and Mason type III (15 cases). Patients treated with Herbert screws showed better functional outcomes with higher mayo elbow performance scores (86 ± 2.74 vs. 80 ± 4.47) and lower Quick disability of arm, shoulder, and hand scores (6.4 ± 1.14 vs. 9.6 ± 1.52).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Herbert screw fixation for radial head fractures results in better functional outcomes and fewer complications than plating. However, further studies with larger sample sizes and extended follow-up periods are needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"15 3","pages":"233-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i03.5398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radial head fractures can be addressed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using either plating or Herbert screw fixation. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of these two techniques.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 30 patients who underwent surgery for radial head fractures between June 2020 and July 2023. Patients were assessed using the modified Mason classification and underwent ORIF with either plating or Herbert screws.

Results: This retrospective study evaluated 30 patients with radial head fractures treated between June 2020 and July 2023, comparing outcomes between ORIF with plating versus Herbert screw fixation. The mean age was 45.45 years (standard deviation 12.74). Fractures were evenly classified as Mason type II (15 cases) and Mason type III (15 cases). Patients treated with Herbert screws showed better functional outcomes with higher mayo elbow performance scores (86 ± 2.74 vs. 80 ± 4.47) and lower Quick disability of arm, shoulder, and hand scores (6.4 ± 1.14 vs. 9.6 ± 1.52).

Conclusion: Herbert screw fixation for radial head fractures results in better functional outcomes and fewer complications than plating. However, further studies with larger sample sizes and extended follow-up periods are needed to validate these findings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信