Expanding Patient-Centered Medical Home Teams in Primary Care: Qualitative Evaluation of Implementation Experiences from a Multi-site Pilot Within the VA Healthcare System.
Neetu Chawla, Michael McGowan, Eleni Skaperdas, Idamay Curtis, Alaina Mori, Susan Stockdale, Danielle Rose
{"title":"Expanding Patient-Centered Medical Home Teams in Primary Care: Qualitative Evaluation of Implementation Experiences from a Multi-site Pilot Within the VA Healthcare System.","authors":"Neetu Chawla, Michael McGowan, Eleni Skaperdas, Idamay Curtis, Alaina Mori, Susan Stockdale, Danielle Rose","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09438-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than a decade ago, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) implemented the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) model in primary care (PC) to improve healthcare access, care coordination, and patient outcomes. In 2021, VA's Office of Primary Care piloted three new PCMH models that aimed to improve provider efficiency and patient healthcare access by adding new team roles and increasing panel sizes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe frontline staff experiences and lessons learned during implementation of expanded PCMH team models.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative, semi-structured interviews of 25 frontline staff at 6 VA sites participating in the PCMH Modernization pilot conducted between March and August 2022.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Interview participants included physicians, nurses, physical therapists, high-risk care managers, and other staff.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We used a rapid analysis approach that included creating and validating interview summaries, developing a matrix of interview domains to identify common themes, and iterative discussion among the research team to build consensus and interpret findings.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>We found that when the basic PCMH structure and processes (e.g., staffing, huddling, pre-visit planning) were not in place, it was challenging to integrate new team members and to increase panel sizes. Role clarity challenges were also introduced by adding certain roles to PCMH teams. The physical therapist and high-risk care manager roles were seen as positive additions to PCMH models. Lastly, matching panel size expansion with staffing capacity was crucial to optimizing team efficiency while increasing patient healthcare access.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare administrators considering expanding PCMH team models may need to thoroughly assess and address site readiness (e.g., adherence to foundational PCMH model, staffing, and practices) prior to implementation. Role clarity challenges should also be anticipated when adding new team roles. Physical therapists and high-risk care managers could be important contributions to existing PCMH models for offloading provider workload and improving population health management.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09438-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: More than a decade ago, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) implemented the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) model in primary care (PC) to improve healthcare access, care coordination, and patient outcomes. In 2021, VA's Office of Primary Care piloted three new PCMH models that aimed to improve provider efficiency and patient healthcare access by adding new team roles and increasing panel sizes.
Objective: To describe frontline staff experiences and lessons learned during implementation of expanded PCMH team models.
Design: Qualitative, semi-structured interviews of 25 frontline staff at 6 VA sites participating in the PCMH Modernization pilot conducted between March and August 2022.
Participants: Interview participants included physicians, nurses, physical therapists, high-risk care managers, and other staff.
Approach: We used a rapid analysis approach that included creating and validating interview summaries, developing a matrix of interview domains to identify common themes, and iterative discussion among the research team to build consensus and interpret findings.
Key results: We found that when the basic PCMH structure and processes (e.g., staffing, huddling, pre-visit planning) were not in place, it was challenging to integrate new team members and to increase panel sizes. Role clarity challenges were also introduced by adding certain roles to PCMH teams. The physical therapist and high-risk care manager roles were seen as positive additions to PCMH models. Lastly, matching panel size expansion with staffing capacity was crucial to optimizing team efficiency while increasing patient healthcare access.
Conclusions: Healthcare administrators considering expanding PCMH team models may need to thoroughly assess and address site readiness (e.g., adherence to foundational PCMH model, staffing, and practices) prior to implementation. Role clarity challenges should also be anticipated when adding new team roles. Physical therapists and high-risk care managers could be important contributions to existing PCMH models for offloading provider workload and improving population health management.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.