Second-line use of dasatinib and nilotinib in a real-world patient population with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

Abstract

Background: While there has been no direct head-to-head comparison, it is assumed that second-line treatment with dasatinib and nilotinib has comparable efficacy but distinct safety profiles in the treatment of patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP). Our aim was to conduct a real-world analysis to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of these two agents.

Methods: Data from 73 CML-CP patients, who received either dasatinib or nilotinib in second-line treatment, were analyzed. The primary interest of the efficacy assessment was a major molecular response (MMR) at the 12-month, 5-year cumulative incidence of treatment failure, and overall survival.

Results: A total of 73.5% of 34 patients in the dasatinib and 76.9% of 39 patients in the nilotinib group achieved MMR at 12 months. Five-year cumulative probability of treatment failure in patients, who previously achieved MMR was 0 and 7.6% for patients receiving dasatinib and nilotinib, respectively (p = 0.25). Eight-year OS was 82.7 and 86.3% for dasatinib and nilotinib groups, respectively (p = 0.90). Pleural effusions were more common in the dasatinib group, leading to treatment discontinuation, while cardiovascular events and thrombotic incidents were more prevalent in the nilotinib group.

Conclusion: Dasatinib and nilotinib exhibit similar efficacy in the CML-CP treatment. Individualized patient management should consider patient comorbidities and safety profiles.