An Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Driven Sleep Promotion Program.

IF 0.8 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Alyssa M Castillo, Asha L Tata, Hyunuk Seung, Matt Bathula, Nidhi Goel, Mojdeh S Heavner, Sean Kelly, Jennifer Y So, Brian Grover
{"title":"An Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Driven Sleep Promotion Program.","authors":"Alyssa M Castillo, Asha L Tata, Hyunuk Seung, Matt Bathula, Nidhi Goel, Mojdeh S Heavner, Sean Kelly, Jennifer Y So, Brian Grover","doi":"10.1177/00185787251324873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Sleep in the hospital is often disrupted by modifiable factors. When addressing poor sleep in the hospital, non-pharmacologic strategies should be utilized initially; however, pharmacologic therapies are often prescribed first. The objective of this initiative was to determine if pharmacist-led initiation of a sleep promotion order set improved quality of inpatient sleep. <b>Methods:</b> This was a prospective, single-center, before-and-after quality improvement project. Patients admitted to the adult internal medicine service with a pharmacologic sleep aid ordered were considered for inclusion. Pharmacists conducted baseline sleep assessments using the Modified Richards Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (mRCSQ), then recommended initiation of the sleep promotion order set. A second mRCSQ was conducted 2 to 5 nights after order set initiation. The mean difference in mRCSQ for individual patients before and after sleep promotion were compared. <b>Results:</b> Fifty-three patients completed both baseline and follow-up mRCSQ surveys. The average mRCSQ score before sleep promotion was 55.8 and the average score after sleep promotion was 56.8 with a subject paired difference of 1.0; <i>P</i> = .8. Individual components of the mRCSQ survey were compared and not found to have significant differences. <b>Conclusions:</b> Implementation of the sleep promotion order set did not result in a significant improvement in patient-reported sleep. This study was marked by significant limitations including difficulty with patient comprehension of the mRCSQ sleep assessment tool, lack of assessment of adherence to the order set, and variability in where in patient clinical course sleep assessments were performed. Despite the findings of this project, further evaluation should be made into the ideal sleep assessment tool for an internal medicine patient population. Medical teams should continue to make an interdisciplinary effort to address modifiable risk factors to optimize sleep in the hospital and limit prescribing of pharmacologic sleep aids.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"00185787251324873"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787251324873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Sleep in the hospital is often disrupted by modifiable factors. When addressing poor sleep in the hospital, non-pharmacologic strategies should be utilized initially; however, pharmacologic therapies are often prescribed first. The objective of this initiative was to determine if pharmacist-led initiation of a sleep promotion order set improved quality of inpatient sleep. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, before-and-after quality improvement project. Patients admitted to the adult internal medicine service with a pharmacologic sleep aid ordered were considered for inclusion. Pharmacists conducted baseline sleep assessments using the Modified Richards Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (mRCSQ), then recommended initiation of the sleep promotion order set. A second mRCSQ was conducted 2 to 5 nights after order set initiation. The mean difference in mRCSQ for individual patients before and after sleep promotion were compared. Results: Fifty-three patients completed both baseline and follow-up mRCSQ surveys. The average mRCSQ score before sleep promotion was 55.8 and the average score after sleep promotion was 56.8 with a subject paired difference of 1.0; P = .8. Individual components of the mRCSQ survey were compared and not found to have significant differences. Conclusions: Implementation of the sleep promotion order set did not result in a significant improvement in patient-reported sleep. This study was marked by significant limitations including difficulty with patient comprehension of the mRCSQ sleep assessment tool, lack of assessment of adherence to the order set, and variability in where in patient clinical course sleep assessments were performed. Despite the findings of this project, further evaluation should be made into the ideal sleep assessment tool for an internal medicine patient population. Medical teams should continue to make an interdisciplinary effort to address modifiable risk factors to optimize sleep in the hospital and limit prescribing of pharmacologic sleep aids.

药剂师推动的睡眠促进计划评估。
目的:住院患者的睡眠经常受到可调节因素的干扰。在医院解决睡眠不佳问题时,应首先采用非药物策略;然而,通常先开药物治疗。这项倡议的目的是确定是否药剂师主导的睡眠促进顺序的启动设置改善的住院病人的睡眠质量。方法:本研究为前瞻性、单中心、前后质量改进项目。在成人内科服务中使用药物辅助睡眠的患者被纳入考虑范围。药剂师使用改进的理查兹·坎贝尔睡眠问卷(mRCSQ)进行基线睡眠评估,然后建议启动睡眠促进顺序集。第二次mRCSQ在命令集启动后2至5晚进行。比较个体患者在促进睡眠前后mRCSQ的平均差异。结果:53例患者完成了基线和随访mRCSQ调查。促进睡眠前的mRCSQ平均得分为55.8分,促进睡眠后的mRCSQ平均得分为56.8分,被试配对差异为1.0分;p = .8。对mRCSQ调查的各个组成部分进行比较,未发现有显著差异。结论:睡眠促进顺序设置的实施并没有导致患者报告睡眠的显著改善。本研究存在显著的局限性,包括患者难以理解mRCSQ睡眠评估工具,缺乏对顺序集的依从性评估,以及在患者临床过程中进行睡眠评估的位置存在差异。尽管这个项目的发现,进一步的评估应该成为理想的睡眠评估工具为内科患者人群。医疗团队应继续进行跨学科的努力,以解决可改变的风险因素,以优化医院的睡眠,并限制药物睡眠辅助的处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital Pharmacy
Hospital Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信