Postoperative Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Frailty Undergoing Urologic Surgery Among American Patients: A Propensity-Score Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.
IF 3.4 2区 医学Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"Postoperative Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Frailty Undergoing Urologic Surgery Among American Patients: A Propensity-Score Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Cheng-Wei Hsu, Chuen-Chau Chang, Fai Lam, Ming-Che Liu, Chun-Chieh Yeh, Ta-Liang Chen, Chao-Shun Lin, Chien-Chang Liao","doi":"10.2147/CLEP.S493366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) has been found to be associated postoperative outcomes, there are limited studies examining its utility in urologic surgery. Our purpose is to evaluate the association between the mFI-5 and postoperative mortality and complications among patients undergoing urologic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2015 to 2020. All adult patients who underwent urologic procedures were included. The mFI-5 includes five items: hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and physical function status. Each item is assigned one point, and an mFI-5 score of 2 or greater indicates frailty. The primary outcome was postoperative mortality, while secondary outcomes were postoperative complications. Propensity score analysis was employed to control for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, each group contained 55,322 surgical patients. The patients in the frailty group were at risks of in-hospital mortality (absolute risk increase [ARI] 0.29%) and higher postoperative complications, including acute myocardial infarction (ARI 0.25%), pneumonia (ARI 0.42%), sepsis (ARI 0.41%), and septic shock (0.2%). Compared to the non-frailty group, the length of hospital stay was higher in the frailty group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with an mFI-5 score of 2 or greater were associated with an increased risk of postoperative mortality and complications, including myocardial infarction, pneumonia, sepsis, and septic shock. The mFI-5 is a simple index that quickly identifies frail patients. This allows for the implementation of prehabilitation and nutritional strategies targeted at enhancing their physiological reserve and optimizing their surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10362,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"17 ","pages":"241-250"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S493366","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Although the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) has been found to be associated postoperative outcomes, there are limited studies examining its utility in urologic surgery. Our purpose is to evaluate the association between the mFI-5 and postoperative mortality and complications among patients undergoing urologic surgery.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2015 to 2020. All adult patients who underwent urologic procedures were included. The mFI-5 includes five items: hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and physical function status. Each item is assigned one point, and an mFI-5 score of 2 or greater indicates frailty. The primary outcome was postoperative mortality, while secondary outcomes were postoperative complications. Propensity score analysis was employed to control for confounders.
Results: After propensity score matching, each group contained 55,322 surgical patients. The patients in the frailty group were at risks of in-hospital mortality (absolute risk increase [ARI] 0.29%) and higher postoperative complications, including acute myocardial infarction (ARI 0.25%), pneumonia (ARI 0.42%), sepsis (ARI 0.41%), and septic shock (0.2%). Compared to the non-frailty group, the length of hospital stay was higher in the frailty group.
Conclusion: Patients with an mFI-5 score of 2 or greater were associated with an increased risk of postoperative mortality and complications, including myocardial infarction, pneumonia, sepsis, and septic shock. The mFI-5 is a simple index that quickly identifies frail patients. This allows for the implementation of prehabilitation and nutritional strategies targeted at enhancing their physiological reserve and optimizing their surgical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Epidemiology is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal. Clinical Epidemiology focuses on the application of epidemiological principles and questions relating to patients and clinical care in terms of prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.
Clinical Epidemiology welcomes papers covering these topics in form of original research and systematic reviews.
Clinical Epidemiology has a special interest in international electronic medical patient records and other routine health care data, especially as applied to safety of medical interventions, clinical utility of diagnostic procedures, understanding short- and long-term clinical course of diseases, clinical epidemiological and biostatistical methods, and systematic reviews.
When considering submission of a paper utilizing publicly-available data, authors should ensure that such studies add significantly to the body of knowledge and that they use appropriate validated methods for identifying health outcomes.
The journal has launched special series describing existing data sources for clinical epidemiology, international health care systems and validation studies of algorithms based on databases and registries.