Patients' Values and Preferences Regarding the Pharmacologic Treatment of Acute Episodic Migraine : A Rapid Review.

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kylie Thaler, Camilla Neubauer-Bruckner, Johanna Feyertag, Arianna Gadinger, Emma Persad, Andrea Chapman, Gernot Wagner, Irma Klerings, Gerald Gartlehner
{"title":"Patients' Values and Preferences Regarding the Pharmacologic Treatment of Acute Episodic Migraine : A Rapid Review.","authors":"Kylie Thaler, Camilla Neubauer-Bruckner, Johanna Feyertag, Arianna Gadinger, Emma Persad, Andrea Chapman, Gernot Wagner, Irma Klerings, Gerald Gartlehner","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-02203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding patients' values and preferences is essential for guideline development.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify and synthesize evidence on patients' values and preferences for the American College of Physicians (ACP) clinical guideline on the pharmacologic treatment of acute attacks of episodic migraine.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE (Ovid) and CINAHL (EBSCO) were searched from inception to October 2024, and backward citation searches on pertinent publications were performed.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Reviewers dually screened abstracts and articles.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>One reviewer performed data extraction, and a second team member checked for accuracy. Risk of bias was assessed in the included studies dually.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>The data were synthesized narratively and the certainty of evidence (COE) was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) and GRADE-CERQual (GRADE-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research) guidance. Of 2243 references screened, we included 16 quantitative studies and 1 qualitative study. Effectiveness for pain was rated as more important than avoiding harms (moderate COE) or treating accompanying symptoms (moderate COE). Both effectiveness for pain and avoiding harms were more important than other attributes such as convenience or route of administration (moderate COE). Relieving nausea and vomiting was more important than other accompanying symptoms, such as photophobia (moderate COE). Cost was not important (moderate COE).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The choices in the included studies differed, making synthesis difficult and reducing certainty. Generalizability is limited because the included studies span 29 years and included patients of average age 35 to 47 years. Potential variation between patients was not captured.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients value effectiveness for pain foremost, and avoiding harm is more important than other treatment attributes.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>American College of Physicians. (PROSPERO: CRD42023464889).</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-02203","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding patients' values and preferences is essential for guideline development.

Purpose: To identify and synthesize evidence on patients' values and preferences for the American College of Physicians (ACP) clinical guideline on the pharmacologic treatment of acute attacks of episodic migraine.

Data sources: MEDLINE (Ovid) and CINAHL (EBSCO) were searched from inception to October 2024, and backward citation searches on pertinent publications were performed.

Study selection: Reviewers dually screened abstracts and articles.

Data extraction: One reviewer performed data extraction, and a second team member checked for accuracy. Risk of bias was assessed in the included studies dually.

Data synthesis: The data were synthesized narratively and the certainty of evidence (COE) was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) and GRADE-CERQual (GRADE-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research) guidance. Of 2243 references screened, we included 16 quantitative studies and 1 qualitative study. Effectiveness for pain was rated as more important than avoiding harms (moderate COE) or treating accompanying symptoms (moderate COE). Both effectiveness for pain and avoiding harms were more important than other attributes such as convenience or route of administration (moderate COE). Relieving nausea and vomiting was more important than other accompanying symptoms, such as photophobia (moderate COE). Cost was not important (moderate COE).

Limitations: The choices in the included studies differed, making synthesis difficult and reducing certainty. Generalizability is limited because the included studies span 29 years and included patients of average age 35 to 47 years. Potential variation between patients was not captured.

Conclusions: Patients value effectiveness for pain foremost, and avoiding harm is more important than other treatment attributes.

Primary funding source: American College of Physicians. (PROSPERO: CRD42023464889).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信