Visual fields, foraging and collision vulnerability in gulls (Laridae)

IF 1.8 3区 生物学 Q1 ORNITHOLOGY
Ibis Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1111/ibi.13360
Jennifer C. Cantlay, Steven J. Portugal, Graham R. Martin
{"title":"Visual fields, foraging and collision vulnerability in gulls (Laridae)","authors":"Jennifer C. Cantlay,&nbsp;Steven J. Portugal,&nbsp;Graham R. Martin","doi":"10.1111/ibi.13360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wide variation in visual field configuration has been recorded among avian species and it is hypothesized that this variation is driven primarily by foraging ecology and predator detection. It has also been shown that visual field configurations can render some species more vulnerable to collisions with human artefacts that extend into open airspace, such as power lines and wind turbines. Visual fields have three main components: the monocular fields describe the extent of the world seen by each eye, the binocular field describes the region where the monocular fields overlap, and the blind area describes the region in which no vision is provided. Among birds, the topography of the binocular field, and the extent and position of the blind area, show considerable interspecific variation. Although Laridae (gulls, terns, skimmers) are a large and cosmopolitan taxon, visual field characteristics of only one species, Black Skimmer <i>Rynchops niger</i>, have been determined. However, skimmers are distinct from other Laridae species because they use a specialized foraging technique based upon tactile cues. We determined visual fields in three species of gulls (European Herring Gulls <i>Larus argentatus</i>, Lesser Black-backed Gulls <i>Larus fuscus</i>, Black-legged Kittiwakes <i>Rissa tridactyla</i>), and found that they show the key characteristics associated with visually guided foraging. However, the binocular field does not extend through the full height of the frontal field. This results in a blind sector, which can project in the direction of flight when gulls pitch their heads sufficiently far forwards to visually search the surface below. This could render gulls vulnerable to collisions with anthropogenic structures (power lines, wind turbines) that extend into the open airspace. Photographs show that gulls in level flight do pitch their heads forward sufficiently to render them almost blind in the direction of travel, and further work on the head positions adopted by gulls in flight are recommended. The visual field of skimmers differs markedly from those of gulls. Their binocular field topography is interpreted as functioning in the control of bill position when skimming (flying just above the water surface with the elongated, blade-like, rhamphotheca of the mandible extending through the water surface). Skimmers also have a blind area, which projects forwards in the direction of travel when skimming. This can be associated with the vulnerability of skimmers to collisions with objects that extend just above the water surface.</p>","PeriodicalId":13254,"journal":{"name":"Ibis","volume":"167 2","pages":"386-396"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ibi.13360","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ibis","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ibi.13360","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORNITHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wide variation in visual field configuration has been recorded among avian species and it is hypothesized that this variation is driven primarily by foraging ecology and predator detection. It has also been shown that visual field configurations can render some species more vulnerable to collisions with human artefacts that extend into open airspace, such as power lines and wind turbines. Visual fields have three main components: the monocular fields describe the extent of the world seen by each eye, the binocular field describes the region where the monocular fields overlap, and the blind area describes the region in which no vision is provided. Among birds, the topography of the binocular field, and the extent and position of the blind area, show considerable interspecific variation. Although Laridae (gulls, terns, skimmers) are a large and cosmopolitan taxon, visual field characteristics of only one species, Black Skimmer Rynchops niger, have been determined. However, skimmers are distinct from other Laridae species because they use a specialized foraging technique based upon tactile cues. We determined visual fields in three species of gulls (European Herring Gulls Larus argentatus, Lesser Black-backed Gulls Larus fuscus, Black-legged Kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla), and found that they show the key characteristics associated with visually guided foraging. However, the binocular field does not extend through the full height of the frontal field. This results in a blind sector, which can project in the direction of flight when gulls pitch their heads sufficiently far forwards to visually search the surface below. This could render gulls vulnerable to collisions with anthropogenic structures (power lines, wind turbines) that extend into the open airspace. Photographs show that gulls in level flight do pitch their heads forward sufficiently to render them almost blind in the direction of travel, and further work on the head positions adopted by gulls in flight are recommended. The visual field of skimmers differs markedly from those of gulls. Their binocular field topography is interpreted as functioning in the control of bill position when skimming (flying just above the water surface with the elongated, blade-like, rhamphotheca of the mandible extending through the water surface). Skimmers also have a blind area, which projects forwards in the direction of travel when skimming. This can be associated with the vulnerability of skimmers to collisions with objects that extend just above the water surface.

Abstract Image

海鸥(蛱蝶科)的视野、觅食和碰撞脆弱性
鸟类的视野结构有很大的差异,这种差异主要是由觅食生态和捕食者探测驱动的。研究还表明,视野结构会使一些物种更容易受到延伸到开放空域的人类人工制品的碰撞,比如电力线和风力涡轮机。视野有三个主要组成部分:单眼视野描述了每只眼睛看到的世界的范围,双眼视野描述了单眼视野重叠的区域,盲区描述了没有视觉的区域。在鸟类中,双眼视野的地形、盲区的范围和位置在种间表现出相当大的差异。虽然Laridae(鸥,燕鸥,掠食鸟)是一个庞大而世界性的分类群,但只有黑掠食鸟(Black Skimmer Rynchops niger)一种的视野特征已被确定。然而,掠食鸟与其他Laridae物种不同,因为它们使用基于触觉线索的特殊觅食技术。通过对三种鸥(欧洲银鸥、小黑背鸥、黑脚三趾鸥)的视野进行测定,发现它们具有视觉引导觅食的关键特征。然而,双眼视野不能延伸到额视野的整个高度。这就形成了一个盲区,当海鸥把头向前倾得足够远的时候,它可以在飞行的方向上投射出来,以视觉上搜索下面的表面。这可能会使海鸥容易受到延伸到开放空域的人为结构(电力线,风力涡轮机)的碰撞。照片显示,水平飞行的海鸥确实会将它们的头部充分向前倾斜,使它们在飞行方向上几乎看不见,建议对海鸥在飞行中采用的头部位置进行进一步的研究。掠食者的视野与海鸥明显不同。它们的双眼视野地形被解释为在掠食时控制喙的位置(在水面上方飞行,下颌骨的细长的,叶片状的,鼠颊状的延伸穿过水面)。撇水器也有一个盲区,当撇水时,盲区在航行方向上向前投射。这可能与撇油器容易与延伸到水面以上的物体碰撞有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ibis
Ibis 生物-鸟类学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
118
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: IBIS publishes original papers, reviews, short communications and forum articles reflecting the forefront of international research activity in ornithological science, with special emphasis on the behaviour, ecology, evolution and conservation of birds. IBIS aims to publish as rapidly as is consistent with the requirements of peer-review and normal publishing constraints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信