Analysis of Youtube Videos for Artificial Airway Suctioning Training of Nurses: A Content Analysis

IF 2.1 4区医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1111/jep.70053

Sercan Kara, Dilek Yildirim

{"title":"Analysis of Youtube Videos for Artificial Airway Suctioning Training of Nurses: A Content Analysis","authors":"Sercan Kara, Dilek Yildirim","doi":"10.1111/jep.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Artificial airway suctioning is one of the most widespread nursing procedures in clinical practice. Although artificial airway suctioning is frequently applied procedure, it is not easy to perform. It is most important to follow the correct technique to prevent possible complications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to assess the content, reliability, and quality of training videos on endotracheal aspiration for nurses. The descriptive and retrospective study was conducted in September 2023 and the videos available on the YouTube platform for artificial airway suctioning training of nurses were evaluated in terms of content, reliability and quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 36 videos were analyzed. The analysis was conducted by two independent researchers. Video Information Form and Endotracheal or Tracheostomy Tube Aspiration Checklist created in line with the literature were used to evaluate the application steps of the videos. The short form of the DISCERN questionnaire was utilized to assess the reliability of the videos, while the 5-point Global Quality Scale (GQS) was employed to evaluate their quality. The mean DISCERN score for the videos was 2.958 ± 1.513, the mean GQS score was 3.430 ± 1.083, and the mean total score for the Implementation Checklist was 47.166 ± 10.338. A strong agreement was observed between the assessments made by the first and second researchers using the DISCERN, GQS, and Checklist. The videos included in the study were found to be of medium quality. Additionally, it was determined that all videos exhibited deficiencies in the Checklist steps. In addition, there were significant deficiencies in application principles such as compliance with sterile technique, sequence of application stages and recording.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These deficiencies are thought to pose a great risk in terms of patient safety. It is recommended that artificial airway suctioning videos available on YouTube be used in nursing education after being checked for content and by experts.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70053","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Artificial airway suctioning is one of the most widespread nursing procedures in clinical practice. Although artificial airway suctioning is frequently applied procedure, it is not easy to perform. It is most important to follow the correct technique to prevent possible complications.

Methods

This study aims to assess the content, reliability, and quality of training videos on endotracheal aspiration for nurses. The descriptive and retrospective study was conducted in September 2023 and the videos available on the YouTube platform for artificial airway suctioning training of nurses were evaluated in terms of content, reliability and quality.

Results

In total, 36 videos were analyzed. The analysis was conducted by two independent researchers. Video Information Form and Endotracheal or Tracheostomy Tube Aspiration Checklist created in line with the literature were used to evaluate the application steps of the videos. The short form of the DISCERN questionnaire was utilized to assess the reliability of the videos, while the 5-point Global Quality Scale (GQS) was employed to evaluate their quality. The mean DISCERN score for the videos was 2.958 ± 1.513, the mean GQS score was 3.430 ± 1.083, and the mean total score for the Implementation Checklist was 47.166 ± 10.338. A strong agreement was observed between the assessments made by the first and second researchers using the DISCERN, GQS, and Checklist. The videos included in the study were found to be of medium quality. Additionally, it was determined that all videos exhibited deficiencies in the Checklist steps. In addition, there were significant deficiencies in application principles such as compliance with sterile technique, sequence of application stages and recording.

Conclusions

These deficiencies are thought to pose a great risk in terms of patient safety. It is recommended that artificial airway suctioning videos available on YouTube be used in nursing education after being checked for content and by experts.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 医学-卫生保健

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

4.20%

发文量

143

审稿时长

3-8 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.