Trust Management Scheme for Securing Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks Against Malicious Nodes and False Message Anomaly

IF 2.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Haewon Byeon, Mohammed E. Seno, Ajeet Kumar Srivastava, Azzah AlGhamdi, Ismail Keshta, Mukesh Soni, K. D. V. Prasad, Dilora Abdurakhimova, Mohammed Wasim Bhatt
{"title":"Trust Management Scheme for Securing Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks Against Malicious Nodes and False Message Anomaly","authors":"Haewon Byeon,&nbsp;Mohammed E. Seno,&nbsp;Ajeet Kumar Srivastava,&nbsp;Azzah AlGhamdi,&nbsp;Ismail Keshta,&nbsp;Mukesh Soni,&nbsp;K. D. V. Prasad,&nbsp;Dilora Abdurakhimova,&nbsp;Mohammed Wasim Bhatt","doi":"10.1002/ett.70110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>With the rapid development of intelligent transportation systems presents significant opportunities for vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) present themselves; yet, these networks also encounter numerous security challenges. In order to maintain road safety and traffic efficiency, information is usually shared through communication between vehicle nodes or between vehicle nodes and roadside units (RSUs). Vehicle nodes, RSUs, and trusted authorities (TAs) constitute the majority of VANETs. An approach to hybrid trust management that is distributed, HTMS-V, is presented to mitigate potential internal attackers and misleading messages in VANETs. This framework considers the attributes of VANETs and employs an enhanced subjective logic model to assess the trustworthiness of vehicle nodes through both direct and indirect trust metrics. Trust links among nodes are formed by information about interactions, and the trustworthiness of messages is determined by the degree of trust between nodes and the distance between them. The assessment outcomes are utilized to detect erroneous communications and malevolent nodes within the network. To assess the efficacy of the proposed approach, four distinct assault scenarios were devised for comparative experiments on the Veins vehicular network simulation platform. The experimental findings indicate that HTMS-V proficiently withstands diverse attacks in VANETs, successfully detecting many false messages and malevolent nodes, even at a malicious node rate of 40%. The percentage of malicious nodes is 3%, 5%, 7%, and 9%, meaning that the overall rates of malicious nodes are 9%, 15%, 21%, and 27%. The malicious node anomaly detection accuracy of the HTMS-V scheme was over 96%, the message judgment accuracy was over 95%, and the false positive rate was less than 4%.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":23282,"journal":{"name":"Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies","volume":"36 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ett.70110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TELECOMMUNICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rapid development of intelligent transportation systems presents significant opportunities for vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) present themselves; yet, these networks also encounter numerous security challenges. In order to maintain road safety and traffic efficiency, information is usually shared through communication between vehicle nodes or between vehicle nodes and roadside units (RSUs). Vehicle nodes, RSUs, and trusted authorities (TAs) constitute the majority of VANETs. An approach to hybrid trust management that is distributed, HTMS-V, is presented to mitigate potential internal attackers and misleading messages in VANETs. This framework considers the attributes of VANETs and employs an enhanced subjective logic model to assess the trustworthiness of vehicle nodes through both direct and indirect trust metrics. Trust links among nodes are formed by information about interactions, and the trustworthiness of messages is determined by the degree of trust between nodes and the distance between them. The assessment outcomes are utilized to detect erroneous communications and malevolent nodes within the network. To assess the efficacy of the proposed approach, four distinct assault scenarios were devised for comparative experiments on the Veins vehicular network simulation platform. The experimental findings indicate that HTMS-V proficiently withstands diverse attacks in VANETs, successfully detecting many false messages and malevolent nodes, even at a malicious node rate of 40%. The percentage of malicious nodes is 3%, 5%, 7%, and 9%, meaning that the overall rates of malicious nodes are 9%, 15%, 21%, and 27%. The malicious node anomaly detection accuracy of the HTMS-V scheme was over 96%, the message judgment accuracy was over 95%, and the false positive rate was less than 4%.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
13.90%
发文量
249
期刊介绍: ransactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies (ETT), formerly known as European Transactions on Telecommunications (ETT), has the following aims: - to attract cutting-edge publications from leading researchers and research groups around the world - to become a highly cited source of timely research findings in emerging fields of telecommunications - to limit revision and publication cycles to a few months and thus significantly increase attractiveness to publish - to become the leading journal for publishing the latest developments in telecommunications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信