Essential steps for establishing a large-scale passive acoustic monitoring for an elusive forest bird species: the Eurasian Woodcock (Scolopax rusticola)

IF 1.8 3区 生物学 Q1 ORNITHOLOGY
Ibis Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1111/ibi.13373
Philip Holderried, Hanna Duschmalé, Dennis Günther, Lars Isenberg, Joy Coppes
{"title":"Essential steps for establishing a large-scale passive acoustic monitoring for an elusive forest bird species: the Eurasian Woodcock (Scolopax rusticola)","authors":"Philip Holderried,&nbsp;Hanna Duschmalé,&nbsp;Dennis Günther,&nbsp;Lars Isenberg,&nbsp;Joy Coppes","doi":"10.1111/ibi.13373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In light of global biodiversity loss, comprehensive monitoring of species and biodiversity is fundamental for effective conservation management. Technology-driven approaches, particularly in the field of bioacoustics, have gained importance, with autonomous recording units (ARUs) such as the AudioMoth being a notable example. However, a systematic application of this technology in large-scale passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) schemes is challenging because of a lack of species-specific calibration techniques and information on survey design. Using Eurasian Woodcock <i>Scolopax rusticola</i> as our focal species, we present application-oriented guidelines for testing and implementing a terrestrial, single-species PAM scheme. In this process, we assessed the species-specific detection space of AudioMoths, considering the influence of recording setup and location. ARUs had similar detection rates as a human observer when set up in locations with low vegetation. A further comparative analysis of bioacoustic and traditional roding surveys confirmed the comparability of the two methods. The last step comprised an evaluation of BirdNET as a means of automated species detection. Although BirdNET reliably detected Woodcock occurrence, our results underline the need for rigorous testing of computer-aided data analysis as well as recording hardware before establishing PAM. We demonstrate that low-cost open source ARUs and open access analysis tools can yield results on a par with traditional survey methods, and we provide specific recommendations for PAM for Eurasian Woodcock.</p>","PeriodicalId":13254,"journal":{"name":"Ibis","volume":"167 2","pages":"543-561"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ibi.13373","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ibis","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ibi.13373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORNITHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In light of global biodiversity loss, comprehensive monitoring of species and biodiversity is fundamental for effective conservation management. Technology-driven approaches, particularly in the field of bioacoustics, have gained importance, with autonomous recording units (ARUs) such as the AudioMoth being a notable example. However, a systematic application of this technology in large-scale passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) schemes is challenging because of a lack of species-specific calibration techniques and information on survey design. Using Eurasian Woodcock Scolopax rusticola as our focal species, we present application-oriented guidelines for testing and implementing a terrestrial, single-species PAM scheme. In this process, we assessed the species-specific detection space of AudioMoths, considering the influence of recording setup and location. ARUs had similar detection rates as a human observer when set up in locations with low vegetation. A further comparative analysis of bioacoustic and traditional roding surveys confirmed the comparability of the two methods. The last step comprised an evaluation of BirdNET as a means of automated species detection. Although BirdNET reliably detected Woodcock occurrence, our results underline the need for rigorous testing of computer-aided data analysis as well as recording hardware before establishing PAM. We demonstrate that low-cost open source ARUs and open access analysis tools can yield results on a par with traditional survey methods, and we provide specific recommendations for PAM for Eurasian Woodcock.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ibis
Ibis 生物-鸟类学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
118
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: IBIS publishes original papers, reviews, short communications and forum articles reflecting the forefront of international research activity in ornithological science, with special emphasis on the behaviour, ecology, evolution and conservation of birds. IBIS aims to publish as rapidly as is consistent with the requirements of peer-review and normal publishing constraints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信