Yellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris) management with wiper- and broadcast-applied glyphosate under greenhouse conditions

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRONOMY
Eric A. L. Jones, Jill K. Alms, David A. Vos
{"title":"Yellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris) management with wiper- and broadcast-applied glyphosate under greenhouse conditions","authors":"Eric A. L. Jones,&nbsp;Jill K. Alms,&nbsp;David A. Vos","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Yellow toadflax [<i>Linaria vulgaris</i> (Mill.)] is an invasive perennial broadleaf weed of the Northern Great Plains region that negatively impacts forage production and wildlife habitat. Few management tactics exist that effectively control the weed species. Glyphosate is a nonselective herbicide that could effectively manage yellow toadflax but is rarely used in pasture/rangeland system due to injury of desirable vegetation. Wiper-applied glyphosate could selectivity control yellow toadflax with minimal injury on desirable vegetation. Greenhouse experiments were conducted to determine the effectiveness of various concentrations and rates of wiper- and broadcast-applied glyphosate on flowering yellow toadflax plants. Plants treated with glyphosate via wiper applicator exhibited injury (63%–80%) and reduced fresh biomass (53%–73%) compared to the nontreated plants. However, the incurred injury and reductions of fresh biomass were not different across the tested glyphosate concentrations. Plants treated with glyphosate via broadcast application(1260 and 2520 g ae ha<sup>−1</sup>) exhibited injury (48%–62%), but biomass was no different when compared to the nontreated plants. The results of the experiments suggest that labeled glyphosate concentrations (33%–75%) for wiper applications provide similar control of yellow toadflax under greenhouse conditions. Broadcast glyphosate applications caused injury on the treated plants but did not decrease biomass compared to nontreated plants. Therefore, wiper-applied glyphosate may be a more viable option to manage yellow toadflax.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70080","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.70080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Yellow toadflax [Linaria vulgaris (Mill.)] is an invasive perennial broadleaf weed of the Northern Great Plains region that negatively impacts forage production and wildlife habitat. Few management tactics exist that effectively control the weed species. Glyphosate is a nonselective herbicide that could effectively manage yellow toadflax but is rarely used in pasture/rangeland system due to injury of desirable vegetation. Wiper-applied glyphosate could selectivity control yellow toadflax with minimal injury on desirable vegetation. Greenhouse experiments were conducted to determine the effectiveness of various concentrations and rates of wiper- and broadcast-applied glyphosate on flowering yellow toadflax plants. Plants treated with glyphosate via wiper applicator exhibited injury (63%–80%) and reduced fresh biomass (53%–73%) compared to the nontreated plants. However, the incurred injury and reductions of fresh biomass were not different across the tested glyphosate concentrations. Plants treated with glyphosate via broadcast application(1260 and 2520 g ae ha−1) exhibited injury (48%–62%), but biomass was no different when compared to the nontreated plants. The results of the experiments suggest that labeled glyphosate concentrations (33%–75%) for wiper applications provide similar control of yellow toadflax under greenhouse conditions. Broadcast glyphosate applications caused injury on the treated plants but did not decrease biomass compared to nontreated plants. Therefore, wiper-applied glyphosate may be a more viable option to manage yellow toadflax.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信