Daniel T. Winter, Lauren A. Monds, Nicholas Lintzeris, Paul S. Haber, Carolyn A. Day
{"title":"Examining Differences Among Opioid Agonist Treatment Clients in Regional and Metropolitan Settings of New South Wales, Australia","authors":"Daniel T. Winter, Lauren A. Monds, Nicholas Lintzeris, Paul S. Haber, Carolyn A. Day","doi":"10.1111/ajr.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Whilst prior studies have examined characteristics and barriers for opioid agonist treatment (OAT) clients in regional settings, there are limited studies examining these differences in relation to metropolitan OAT clients. This study aimed to examine key characteristics, including sedating medication and substance use, transport and driving behaviours and differences between OAT clients within regional and metropolitan areas of New South Wales, Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Cross-sectional survey of OAT clients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen public OAT clinics across New South Wales, Australia, between January 2020 and June 2021.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Survey was completed by 482 people currently receiving OAT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Self-reported sample characteristics, self-reported sedating medication use and substance use, transportation and driving histories.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Significant differences in OAT pharmacotherapies prescribed between regional and metropolitan participants were noted (aOR = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.42–4.11). Methadone was the most commonly prescribed OAT in both settings (74.1% and 54.4%, respectively). Nearly half (45.6%) of regional participants received OAT from a private dispensary compared to 4.7% in metropolitan areas. While few differences in past-month substance use were noted, reported heroin use was lower (aOR = 0.27; 95% CI = 0.09–0.78) in regional areas. Regional participants were more likely than metropolitan participants to drive a vehicle to dosing (aOR = 2.89, 95% CI = 1.12–7.46) and less likely to take public transport (aOR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.18–0.93) or active transport (aOR = 3.75, 95% CI = 1.50–9.40). Few differences regarding driving offences, based on geography, were noted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Key differences with treatment, substance use, transport and driving were noted within this study. It is evident that regional OAT clients more often rely on motor vehicles to complete daily activities. Such challenges related to OAT should be addressed by informed policy and regulatory changes that ensure access and equity of treatment and safety, regardless of location.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":"33 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.70029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.70029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Whilst prior studies have examined characteristics and barriers for opioid agonist treatment (OAT) clients in regional settings, there are limited studies examining these differences in relation to metropolitan OAT clients. This study aimed to examine key characteristics, including sedating medication and substance use, transport and driving behaviours and differences between OAT clients within regional and metropolitan areas of New South Wales, Australia.
Design
Cross-sectional survey of OAT clients.
Setting
Fifteen public OAT clinics across New South Wales, Australia, between January 2020 and June 2021.
Participants
Survey was completed by 482 people currently receiving OAT.
Main Outcome Measures
Self-reported sample characteristics, self-reported sedating medication use and substance use, transportation and driving histories.
Results
Significant differences in OAT pharmacotherapies prescribed between regional and metropolitan participants were noted (aOR = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.42–4.11). Methadone was the most commonly prescribed OAT in both settings (74.1% and 54.4%, respectively). Nearly half (45.6%) of regional participants received OAT from a private dispensary compared to 4.7% in metropolitan areas. While few differences in past-month substance use were noted, reported heroin use was lower (aOR = 0.27; 95% CI = 0.09–0.78) in regional areas. Regional participants were more likely than metropolitan participants to drive a vehicle to dosing (aOR = 2.89, 95% CI = 1.12–7.46) and less likely to take public transport (aOR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.18–0.93) or active transport (aOR = 3.75, 95% CI = 1.50–9.40). Few differences regarding driving offences, based on geography, were noted.
Conclusions
Key differences with treatment, substance use, transport and driving were noted within this study. It is evident that regional OAT clients more often rely on motor vehicles to complete daily activities. Such challenges related to OAT should be addressed by informed policy and regulatory changes that ensure access and equity of treatment and safety, regardless of location.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.