Research on the Construction Process Scheme of Artificial Chamber of Compressed Air Energy Storage Power Station

ce/papers Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1002/cepa.3214
Bei Cai, Han Wang, Liang Lv, Kang Chen
{"title":"Research on the Construction Process Scheme of Artificial Chamber of Compressed Air Energy Storage Power Station","authors":"Bei Cai,&nbsp;Han Wang,&nbsp;Liang Lv,&nbsp;Kang Chen","doi":"10.1002/cepa.3214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The introduction of a new power system centered on renewable energy presents significant opportunities for compressed air energy storage (CAES), which boasts noteworthy advantages such as scalability, cost-effectiveness, longevity, and rapid construction timelines. However, a considerable constraint on the advancement of affordable air energy storage is the need for substantial gas storage capacity. For instance, a single compressed air project with a capacity of 300 MW over 5 hours necessitates more than 500,000 cubic meters of gas storage space. Due to the extensive gas storage requirements of large-scale CAES facilities, surface storage solutions are typically only viable for smaller power stations and are largely confined to experimental phases. Furthermore, the capital investment for these above-ground facilities tends to be higher than that for underground alternatives. Consequently, to optimize both economic viability and storage capacity, underground gas storage solutions are predominantly utilized in projects currently under development or in the planning stage. Gas storage infrastructure represents a crucial component of a CAES power station, serving as a key determinant for both construction costs and site selection as well as being pivotal to the technical efficiency and safety of energy operations. This paper integrates hydropower and extraction construction methodologies, thoroughly evaluates the economic implications and periodic nature of construction, and analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of various construction techniques in relation to specific projects. This analysis aims to facilitate and inform the large-scale implementation of forthcoming compressed air energy storage initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":100223,"journal":{"name":"ce/papers","volume":"8 2","pages":"1270-1281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ce/papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cepa.3214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The introduction of a new power system centered on renewable energy presents significant opportunities for compressed air energy storage (CAES), which boasts noteworthy advantages such as scalability, cost-effectiveness, longevity, and rapid construction timelines. However, a considerable constraint on the advancement of affordable air energy storage is the need for substantial gas storage capacity. For instance, a single compressed air project with a capacity of 300 MW over 5 hours necessitates more than 500,000 cubic meters of gas storage space. Due to the extensive gas storage requirements of large-scale CAES facilities, surface storage solutions are typically only viable for smaller power stations and are largely confined to experimental phases. Furthermore, the capital investment for these above-ground facilities tends to be higher than that for underground alternatives. Consequently, to optimize both economic viability and storage capacity, underground gas storage solutions are predominantly utilized in projects currently under development or in the planning stage. Gas storage infrastructure represents a crucial component of a CAES power station, serving as a key determinant for both construction costs and site selection as well as being pivotal to the technical efficiency and safety of energy operations. This paper integrates hydropower and extraction construction methodologies, thoroughly evaluates the economic implications and periodic nature of construction, and analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of various construction techniques in relation to specific projects. This analysis aims to facilitate and inform the large-scale implementation of forthcoming compressed air energy storage initiatives.

压缩空气蓄能电站人工硐室施工工艺方案研究
以可再生能源为中心的新电力系统的引入为压缩空气储能(CAES)提供了巨大的机会,压缩空气储能具有可扩展性、成本效益、使用寿命和快速建设时间等显著优势。然而,对负担得起的空气储能的发展的一个相当大的限制是需要大量的气体储存能力。例如,单个5小时容量为300兆瓦的压缩空气项目需要超过50万立方米的储气空间。由于大型CAES设施需要大量的气体储存,地面储存解决方案通常只适用于较小的发电站,并且主要局限于实验阶段。此外,这些地上设施的资本投资往往高于地下设施。因此,为了优化经济可行性和储存能力,地下储气解决方案主要用于目前正在开发或处于规划阶段的项目。储气设施是CAES电站的重要组成部分,是决定建设成本和选址的关键因素,也是能源运营技术效率和安全的关键。本文整合了水电和采掘施工方法,全面评估了施工的经济影响和周期性,并针对具体项目分析了各种施工技术的优缺点。该分析旨在促进和通知即将到来的压缩空气储能计划的大规模实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信