Informing Implementation Strategies for Pharmacogenomics in Cancer: Development of Survey Tools for Healthcare Professionals and Consumers

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Marliese Alexander, Chiao Xin Lim, Senthil Lingaratnam, Sarah Glewis, Joanne Wickens, Abbey Hird, Zi Yue Chen, Alistair Bozkurt, Amit Khot, David Routledge, Sam Harris, Craig Underhill, Ashley Whitechurch, Lydia Leong, Marcus Pergolini, Gail Rowan, Monnette Samo, Chloe Georgiou, Peter Savas, Jenny Devine, Alysia Kepert, Safeera Y. Hussainy
{"title":"Informing Implementation Strategies for Pharmacogenomics in Cancer: Development of Survey Tools for Healthcare Professionals and Consumers","authors":"Marliese Alexander,&nbsp;Chiao Xin Lim,&nbsp;Senthil Lingaratnam,&nbsp;Sarah Glewis,&nbsp;Joanne Wickens,&nbsp;Abbey Hird,&nbsp;Zi Yue Chen,&nbsp;Alistair Bozkurt,&nbsp;Amit Khot,&nbsp;David Routledge,&nbsp;Sam Harris,&nbsp;Craig Underhill,&nbsp;Ashley Whitechurch,&nbsp;Lydia Leong,&nbsp;Marcus Pergolini,&nbsp;Gail Rowan,&nbsp;Monnette Samo,&nbsp;Chloe Georgiou,&nbsp;Peter Savas,&nbsp;Jenny Devine,&nbsp;Alysia Kepert,&nbsp;Safeera Y. Hussainy","doi":"10.1111/cts.70144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Integration of clinical pharmacogenomics (PGx) within routine cancer care is limited despite frequent use of medicines impacted by PGx, evidence for the benefits of PGx, and the availability of international PGx clinical guidelines. Our study objective was to develop survey tools to assess PGx knowledge, attitudes, practices, perceptions, and education needs among (a) doctors, nurses, and pharmacists involved in cancer care (healthcare professionals, HCPs) and (b) adults who have received cancer treatment or their carers (consumers), with the view to informing implementation strategies for PGx in solid and hematologic cancers. Survey tools were developed in a three-phase (ph) mixed-methods approach. Content was informed by systematic literature review findings and framed by determinants of behavior as informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (ph-1). Refinement occurred through four separate priority partnership meetings (ph-2). Meetings focused on clinical PGx practices within select cancer streams, and consumers' knowledge, attitudes, and preferences for PGx testing. Content/face validity and health literacy (Flesch Kincaid Grade Level) assessments informed final refinements (ph-3). Separate HCP and consumer survey tools were developed with six common sections: (1) introduction; (2) demographics; (3) experience; (4) knowledge, attitudes, practices and perceptions; (5) education; and (6) vignettes. Content and face validity were rated highly with acceptable health literacy assessments for questions within the consumer survey (median grade level 6; range 1–8). The developed survey tools will be used to generate evidence to inform local implementation strategies for PGx in cancer and promote broader integration of pharmacogenomics in routine clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70144","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70144","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integration of clinical pharmacogenomics (PGx) within routine cancer care is limited despite frequent use of medicines impacted by PGx, evidence for the benefits of PGx, and the availability of international PGx clinical guidelines. Our study objective was to develop survey tools to assess PGx knowledge, attitudes, practices, perceptions, and education needs among (a) doctors, nurses, and pharmacists involved in cancer care (healthcare professionals, HCPs) and (b) adults who have received cancer treatment or their carers (consumers), with the view to informing implementation strategies for PGx in solid and hematologic cancers. Survey tools were developed in a three-phase (ph) mixed-methods approach. Content was informed by systematic literature review findings and framed by determinants of behavior as informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (ph-1). Refinement occurred through four separate priority partnership meetings (ph-2). Meetings focused on clinical PGx practices within select cancer streams, and consumers' knowledge, attitudes, and preferences for PGx testing. Content/face validity and health literacy (Flesch Kincaid Grade Level) assessments informed final refinements (ph-3). Separate HCP and consumer survey tools were developed with six common sections: (1) introduction; (2) demographics; (3) experience; (4) knowledge, attitudes, practices and perceptions; (5) education; and (6) vignettes. Content and face validity were rated highly with acceptable health literacy assessments for questions within the consumer survey (median grade level 6; range 1–8). The developed survey tools will be used to generate evidence to inform local implementation strategies for PGx in cancer and promote broader integration of pharmacogenomics in routine clinical care.

Abstract Image

为癌症药物基因组学的实施策略提供信息:为医疗保健专业人员和消费者开发调查工具
临床药物基因组学(PGx)在常规癌症治疗中的整合是有限的,尽管经常使用受PGx影响的药物,有证据表明PGx的益处,以及国际PGx临床指南的可用性。我们的研究目的是开发调查工具来评估(a)参与癌症护理的医生、护士和药剂师(医疗保健专业人员,HCPs)和(b)接受过癌症治疗的成年人或他们的照顾者(消费者)的PGx知识、态度、做法、观念和教育需求,以期为实体癌和血液癌中PGx的实施策略提供信息。采用三相(ph)混合方法开发了调查工具。内容由系统的文献综述结果提供,并由理论领域框架(ph-1)提供的行为决定因素构成。细化是通过四个单独的优先级伙伴关系会议(ph-2)进行的。会议的重点是在选定的癌症流中的临床PGx实践,以及消费者对PGx检测的知识、态度和偏好。内容/面部有效性和健康素养(Flesch Kincaid Grade Level)评估为最终改进(ph-3)提供了依据。开发了单独的HCP和消费者调查工具,共有六个部分:(1)介绍;(2)人口统计;(3)经验;(4)知识、态度、做法和观念;(5)教育;(6)小插图。内容效度和表面效度在消费者调查问题的可接受健康素养评估中被高度评价(中位等级等级6;范围1 - 8)。开发的调查工具将用于产生证据,为癌症中PGx的地方实施战略提供信息,并促进药物基因组学在常规临床护理中的更广泛整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信