Performance assessment of machine learning techniques in electronic nose systems for power transformer fault detection

IF 9.6 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Sergi Torres Araya , Jorge Ardila-Rey , Matías Cerda Luna , Jorge Portilla , Suganya Govindarajan , Camilo Alvear Jorquera , Roger Schurch
{"title":"Performance assessment of machine learning techniques in electronic nose systems for power transformer fault detection","authors":"Sergi Torres Araya ,&nbsp;Jorge Ardila-Rey ,&nbsp;Matías Cerda Luna ,&nbsp;Jorge Portilla ,&nbsp;Suganya Govindarajan ,&nbsp;Camilo Alvear Jorquera ,&nbsp;Roger Schurch","doi":"10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oil-filled transformers are critical assets in electrical power systems, both economically and operationally. Their condition is assessed through insulation system, which is greatly affected by various degradation mechanisms. Hence, effective fault diagnosis is essential to prolong their lifespan. Early detection and correction of incipient faults through Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) are crucial to prevent irreversible damage. Current measurement systems have significant limitations that impede their use in routine monitoring and underscore the need for new, accessible technologies that are both technically and economically viable to efficiently detect incipient faults.</div><div>This study evaluates the performance of various Machine Learning (ML) techniques to predict the concentrations of hydrogen (H₂), methane (CH₄), acetylene (C₂H₂), ethylene (C₂H₄), and ethane (C₂H₆) in oil samples subjected to different types of electrical faults, using data from a novel electronic nose (E-Nose) equipped with eleven MOS-type gas sensors. The evaluated ML techniques include Linear Regression (LR), Multivariate Linear Regression (MLR), Principal Component Regression (PCR), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Random Forest Regression (RFR). Experimental results from 218 measurement processes revealed that RFR and MLP models exhibited superior performance, with RFR achieving the highest accuracy for predicting H₂, C₂H₂, and C₂H₆, while MLP excelled for CH₄ and C₂H₄. A comparison with a commercial DGA system using the Duval Pentagon Method confirmed the effectiveness of these models in diagnosing transformer faults. These findings underscore the potential of combining E-Noses with ML techniques as an innovative and efficient solution for early fault diagnosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34138,"journal":{"name":"Energy and AI","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100497"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666546825000291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oil-filled transformers are critical assets in electrical power systems, both economically and operationally. Their condition is assessed through insulation system, which is greatly affected by various degradation mechanisms. Hence, effective fault diagnosis is essential to prolong their lifespan. Early detection and correction of incipient faults through Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) are crucial to prevent irreversible damage. Current measurement systems have significant limitations that impede their use in routine monitoring and underscore the need for new, accessible technologies that are both technically and economically viable to efficiently detect incipient faults.
This study evaluates the performance of various Machine Learning (ML) techniques to predict the concentrations of hydrogen (H₂), methane (CH₄), acetylene (C₂H₂), ethylene (C₂H₄), and ethane (C₂H₆) in oil samples subjected to different types of electrical faults, using data from a novel electronic nose (E-Nose) equipped with eleven MOS-type gas sensors. The evaluated ML techniques include Linear Regression (LR), Multivariate Linear Regression (MLR), Principal Component Regression (PCR), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Random Forest Regression (RFR). Experimental results from 218 measurement processes revealed that RFR and MLP models exhibited superior performance, with RFR achieving the highest accuracy for predicting H₂, C₂H₂, and C₂H₆, while MLP excelled for CH₄ and C₂H₄. A comparison with a commercial DGA system using the Duval Pentagon Method confirmed the effectiveness of these models in diagnosing transformer faults. These findings underscore the potential of combining E-Noses with ML techniques as an innovative and efficient solution for early fault diagnosis.

Abstract Image

电力变压器故障检测电子鼻系统中机器学习技术的性能评估
充油变压器是电力系统的重要资产,无论是经济上还是运行上。它们的状态是通过绝缘系统来评估的,而绝缘系统受各种降解机制的影响很大。因此,有效的故障诊断对于延长其使用寿命至关重要。通过溶解气体分析(DGA)早期发现和纠正早期故障对于防止不可逆损害至关重要。目前的测量系统有很大的局限性,这阻碍了它们在日常监测中的应用,并强调需要新的、可获得的技术,这些技术和经济上都可行,以有效地检测早期故障。本研究评估了各种机器学习(ML)技术的性能,以预测受到不同类型电气故障的油样中的氢(H₂),甲烷(CH₄),乙炔(C₂H₂),乙烯(C₂H₄)和乙烷(C₂H₆)的浓度,使用配备了11个mos型气体传感器的新型电子鼻(E-Nose)的数据。评估的机器学习技术包括线性回归(LR)、多元线性回归(MLR)、主成分回归(PCR)、多层感知器(MLP)、偏最小二乘回归(PLS)、支持向量回归(SVR)和随机森林回归(RFR)。218个测量过程的实验结果表明,RFR和MLP模型表现出优异的性能,其中RFR模型对H₂、C₂H₂和C₂H₆的预测精度最高,而MLP模型对CH₂H₄和C₂H₄的预测精度最高。通过与商用DGA系统的Duval五边形方法的比较,验证了该模型在变压器故障诊断中的有效性。这些发现强调了将e - nose与ML技术相结合作为早期故障诊断的创新和有效解决方案的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and AI
Energy and AI Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信