Quid pro Quo: Information disclosure for AI feedback in Human-AI collaboration

Izabel Cvetkovic , Imke Grashoff , Ana Jovancevic , Eva Bittner
{"title":"Quid pro Quo: Information disclosure for AI feedback in Human-AI collaboration","authors":"Izabel Cvetkovic ,&nbsp;Imke Grashoff ,&nbsp;Ana Jovancevic ,&nbsp;Eva Bittner","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the intersection of AI-driven teamwork facilitation and user privacy concerns in virtual collaboration. Specifically, we investigate the extent to which individuals in AI-supported teamwork environments are willing to disclose personal information to improve collaboration and performance. Leveraging a vignette-based study, we assess participants' intentions to disclose different different types of personal information, such as language and choice of words, talk times, body language or sentiments, during a professional virtual collaboration process. Thereby, conditions under which the information is disclosed vary, referring to whether the results of information disclosure are either shared individually or with the whole group and whether they are shared anonymously or non-anonymously. Drawing on privacy calculus theory, our investigation further incorporates crucial contextual factors—Trust in AI, Perceived Risks, and Perceived Benefits—to comprehensively examine their influence on individuals' intentions to disclose information. Our findings reveal notable differences in Intention to disclose across various Information types, with lower intentions observed particularly for emotion and attention level disclosures. Surprisingly, other manipulated factors, including the level of anonymity, do not show an effect in influencing disclosure intentions. Crucially, our study underscores the pivotal role of Trust in AI, emerging as a consistent predictor of Intention to disclose across all Information types. Furthermore, its impact on disclosure intentions is mediated by individuals’ perceptions of risks and benefits associated with disclosure. Our research contributes to the evolving field of privacy calculus theory by shedding light on the nuanced interplay between Trust, Perceived Risks, Benefits, and information disclosure to AI in teamwork scenarios. These insights bear implications for the effective deployment of AI in facilitating teamwork within the workplace, emphasizing the need for cultivating trust and understanding the specific sensitivities associated with different types of information.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882125000210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the intersection of AI-driven teamwork facilitation and user privacy concerns in virtual collaboration. Specifically, we investigate the extent to which individuals in AI-supported teamwork environments are willing to disclose personal information to improve collaboration and performance. Leveraging a vignette-based study, we assess participants' intentions to disclose different different types of personal information, such as language and choice of words, talk times, body language or sentiments, during a professional virtual collaboration process. Thereby, conditions under which the information is disclosed vary, referring to whether the results of information disclosure are either shared individually or with the whole group and whether they are shared anonymously or non-anonymously. Drawing on privacy calculus theory, our investigation further incorporates crucial contextual factors—Trust in AI, Perceived Risks, and Perceived Benefits—to comprehensively examine their influence on individuals' intentions to disclose information. Our findings reveal notable differences in Intention to disclose across various Information types, with lower intentions observed particularly for emotion and attention level disclosures. Surprisingly, other manipulated factors, including the level of anonymity, do not show an effect in influencing disclosure intentions. Crucially, our study underscores the pivotal role of Trust in AI, emerging as a consistent predictor of Intention to disclose across all Information types. Furthermore, its impact on disclosure intentions is mediated by individuals’ perceptions of risks and benefits associated with disclosure. Our research contributes to the evolving field of privacy calculus theory by shedding light on the nuanced interplay between Trust, Perceived Risks, Benefits, and information disclosure to AI in teamwork scenarios. These insights bear implications for the effective deployment of AI in facilitating teamwork within the workplace, emphasizing the need for cultivating trust and understanding the specific sensitivities associated with different types of information.
交换条件:人机协作中AI反馈的信息披露
本文探讨了虚拟协作中人工智能驱动的团队协作促进和用户隐私问题的交集。具体来说,我们调查了在人工智能支持的团队环境中,个人愿意披露个人信息以改善协作和绩效的程度。利用一项基于小插曲的研究,我们评估了参与者在专业虚拟协作过程中披露不同类型个人信息的意图,如语言和词语的选择、谈话时间、肢体语言或情绪。因此,信息披露的条件是不同的,即信息披露的结果是单独共享还是与整个群体共享,是匿名共享还是非匿名共享。利用隐私演算理论,我们的调查进一步纳入了关键的背景因素——对人工智能的信任、感知风险和感知利益——以全面检查它们对个人披露信息意图的影响。我们的研究结果表明,在不同类型的信息中,披露意图存在显著差异,尤其是在情感和注意力水平上的披露意图较低。令人惊讶的是,其他被操纵的因素,包括匿名程度,并没有显示出影响披露意图的效果。至关重要的是,我们的研究强调了信任在人工智能中的关键作用,它是所有信息类型中披露意图的一致预测因素。此外,其对披露意图的影响是由个人对披露相关风险和利益的认知介导的。我们的研究通过揭示团队协作场景中信任、感知风险、利益和信息披露之间微妙的相互作用,为隐私演算理论的发展做出了贡献。这些见解对人工智能在促进工作场所团队合作方面的有效部署具有重要意义,强调了培养信任和理解与不同类型信息相关的特定敏感性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信