The organized activities of ransomware groups: A social network approach

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Ekaterina Botchkovar , Kexin Cui , Olena Antonaccio , Robert Perkins , David Maimon
{"title":"The organized activities of ransomware groups: A social network approach","authors":"Ekaterina Botchkovar ,&nbsp;Kexin Cui ,&nbsp;Olena Antonaccio ,&nbsp;Robert Perkins ,&nbsp;David Maimon","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using Social Network Analysis (SNA), our study examines how cybercriminals organize and operate within Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) networks by analyzing connections between 96 cybercriminals and 140 ransomware groups. We compared these online criminal networks to traditional organized crime groups to better understand their structure and operations. Initially, we expected to find RaaS networks operating similarly to traditional criminal organizations—with tight connections, central leadership, and close-knit teams. However, our analysis revealed that RaaS networks are more loosely organized and decentralized, with members being spread out rather than clustered in tight groups. However, similar to traditional organized crime groups, certain individuals play crucial roles as network \"hubs\" or \"brokers\" in RaaS networks. These key players maintain connections across different parts of the network and facilitate information sharing. Our statistical analyses, based on Ordinary Least Squares regression models with log-transformed outcomes, showed that individuals with more direct connections tend to be network “brokers”, helping bridge different parts of the network. These findings suggest that while ransomware groups share some similarities with traditional organized crime, they operate in distinct ways. By identifying and targeting key network players who keep ransomware operations running, law enforcement may be more effective in disrupting these criminal networks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102873"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000636","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using Social Network Analysis (SNA), our study examines how cybercriminals organize and operate within Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) networks by analyzing connections between 96 cybercriminals and 140 ransomware groups. We compared these online criminal networks to traditional organized crime groups to better understand their structure and operations. Initially, we expected to find RaaS networks operating similarly to traditional criminal organizations—with tight connections, central leadership, and close-knit teams. However, our analysis revealed that RaaS networks are more loosely organized and decentralized, with members being spread out rather than clustered in tight groups. However, similar to traditional organized crime groups, certain individuals play crucial roles as network "hubs" or "brokers" in RaaS networks. These key players maintain connections across different parts of the network and facilitate information sharing. Our statistical analyses, based on Ordinary Least Squares regression models with log-transformed outcomes, showed that individuals with more direct connections tend to be network “brokers”, helping bridge different parts of the network. These findings suggest that while ransomware groups share some similarities with traditional organized crime, they operate in distinct ways. By identifying and targeting key network players who keep ransomware operations running, law enforcement may be more effective in disrupting these criminal networks.
勒索软件组织的有组织活动:一种社会网络方法
我们的研究使用社会网络分析(SNA),通过分析96个网络罪犯和140个勒索软件组织之间的联系,研究了网络罪犯如何在勒索软件即服务(RaaS)网络中组织和运作。我们将这些在线犯罪网络与传统的有组织犯罪集团进行了比较,以便更好地了解他们的结构和运作方式。最初,我们期望发现RaaS网络的运作方式与传统犯罪组织相似——具有紧密的联系、中央领导和紧密的团队。然而,我们的分析显示,RaaS网络的组织更加松散和分散,成员分散而不是聚集在紧密的组中。然而,与传统的有组织犯罪集团类似,某些个人在RaaS网络中扮演着网络“枢纽”或“经纪人”的关键角色。这些关键参与者维护网络不同部分之间的连接,并促进信息共享。我们基于对数变换结果的普通最小二乘回归模型的统计分析表明,拥有更多直接联系的个体往往是网络“经纪人”,有助于在网络的不同部分之间架起桥梁。这些发现表明,尽管勒索软件组织与传统的有组织犯罪有一些相似之处,但它们的运作方式却截然不同。通过识别和瞄准那些让勒索软件运作的关键网络参与者,执法部门可能会更有效地破坏这些犯罪网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信