Electroencephalography in Preterm Infants for Predicting Neurodevelopmental Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analysis

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vijay Kumar Krishnegowda DrNB , Prathik Bandiya DM , Tapas Bandyopadhyay DM , Haribalakrishna Balasubramanian DM , Daniele Trevisanuto MD , Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy DM
{"title":"Electroencephalography in Preterm Infants for Predicting Neurodevelopmental Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analysis","authors":"Vijay Kumar Krishnegowda DrNB ,&nbsp;Prathik Bandiya DM ,&nbsp;Tapas Bandyopadhyay DM ,&nbsp;Haribalakrishna Balasubramanian DM ,&nbsp;Daniele Trevisanuto MD ,&nbsp;Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy DM","doi":"10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2025.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Electroencephalography (EEG) and amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) have been utilized to predict neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) in preterm infants.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception until November 1, 2023. Observational studies evaluating EEG and aEEG and neurodevelopment assessment performed at least after six months corrected age (CA) were included. A diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) meta-analysis using a Bayesian random-effects bivariate model was performed. QUADAS-2 was used to assess the risk of bias, and GRADE approach was used to ascertain the certainty of evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-eight studies (n = 4667) were included in the systematic review of which 26 studies (n = 3363) were synthesized in a DTA meta-analysis. EEG and aEEG had a sensitivity of 63.9% (95% credible intervals [CrI]: 52.1%, 76.3%) and specificity of 87.6% (80.9%, 94.1%) for the outcome of any NDI (&lt;1 S.D. from the mean value for the CA). For the outcome of severe NDI (&lt;2 S.D.s from the mean value for the CA) (10 studies, n = 1075), the sensitivity was 59.7% (42.3%, 75.9%) and specificity was 85.2% (72.7%, 92.4%). Evidence certainty was very low to low. Subgroup analysis of studies that had utilized Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development between 18 and 30 months CA (12 studies, n = 1202) for neurodevelopmental assessment revealed a sensitivity of 59% (42.3%, 74.7%) and specificity of 83.7% (75.8%, 90.1%) for any NDI.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>EEG and aEEG possibly have suboptimal sensitivity and an acceptable-to-high specificity in predicting any NDI and severe NDI in preterm infants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19956,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric neurology","volume":"166 ","pages":"Pages 65-80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887899425000517","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Electroencephalography (EEG) and amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) have been utilized to predict neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) in preterm infants.

Methods

MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception until November 1, 2023. Observational studies evaluating EEG and aEEG and neurodevelopment assessment performed at least after six months corrected age (CA) were included. A diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) meta-analysis using a Bayesian random-effects bivariate model was performed. QUADAS-2 was used to assess the risk of bias, and GRADE approach was used to ascertain the certainty of evidence.

Results

Thirty-eight studies (n = 4667) were included in the systematic review of which 26 studies (n = 3363) were synthesized in a DTA meta-analysis. EEG and aEEG had a sensitivity of 63.9% (95% credible intervals [CrI]: 52.1%, 76.3%) and specificity of 87.6% (80.9%, 94.1%) for the outcome of any NDI (<1 S.D. from the mean value for the CA). For the outcome of severe NDI (<2 S.D.s from the mean value for the CA) (10 studies, n = 1075), the sensitivity was 59.7% (42.3%, 75.9%) and specificity was 85.2% (72.7%, 92.4%). Evidence certainty was very low to low. Subgroup analysis of studies that had utilized Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development between 18 and 30 months CA (12 studies, n = 1202) for neurodevelopmental assessment revealed a sensitivity of 59% (42.3%, 74.7%) and specificity of 83.7% (75.8%, 90.1%) for any NDI.

Conclusion

EEG and aEEG possibly have suboptimal sensitivity and an acceptable-to-high specificity in predicting any NDI and severe NDI in preterm infants.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric neurology
Pediatric neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
176
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Pediatric Neurology publishes timely peer-reviewed clinical and research articles covering all aspects of the developing nervous system. Pediatric Neurology features up-to-the-minute publication of the latest advances in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of pediatric neurologic disorders. The journal''s editor, E. Steve Roach, in conjunction with the team of Associate Editors, heads an internationally recognized editorial board, ensuring the most authoritative and extensive coverage of the field. Among the topics covered are: epilepsy, mitochondrial diseases, congenital malformations, chromosomopathies, peripheral neuropathies, perinatal and childhood stroke, cerebral palsy, as well as other diseases affecting the developing nervous system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信