{"title":"Improving freshness prediction in frozen fish burgers: A comparative study of propolis additives using ANN and RSM models","authors":"Fatemeh Koushki , Mohsen Mokhtarian , Mohsen Dalvi-Isfahan , Hongwei Xiao , Weipeng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.agrcom.2025.100078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The freshness of fish burgers (FBs) declines during frozen storage. Here, we assessed FB freshness using quality control indicators (QCIs), including peroxide value (PV), total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N), and total viable count (TVC). Two predictive models were compared, one based on response surface methodology (RSM) and the other on an artificial neural network (ANN). Their accuracy was evaluated using frozen FBs that incorporated different concentrations of freeze-dried propolis (FDP; 0%–0.4%) and stored for various durations (0, 30, 60, and 90 days). Both FDP and storage time (ST) had significant effects (<em>p</em> < 0.01) on the quality control indicators (QCIs) of frozen FBs, with ST having a more significant effect than FDP on the QCI changes. A numerical optimization process determined that the optimal values of ST and FDP were approximately 27 days and 0.30 g/[100 g of fish paste], respectively. The coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) values for the QCIs of frozen FBs in the ANN model were 0.9657 for PV, 0.9753 for TVB-N, and 0.9872 for TVC. These values were slightly lower in the RSM model, 0.9717 for PV, 0.9603 for TVB-N, and 0.9861 for TVC. Overall, the ANN model with a 2-13-3 topology (13 neurons in the first hidden layer) showed greater potential for prediction of FB quality during frozen storage and was found to be the more efficient method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100065,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture Communications","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100078"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949798125000080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The freshness of fish burgers (FBs) declines during frozen storage. Here, we assessed FB freshness using quality control indicators (QCIs), including peroxide value (PV), total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N), and total viable count (TVC). Two predictive models were compared, one based on response surface methodology (RSM) and the other on an artificial neural network (ANN). Their accuracy was evaluated using frozen FBs that incorporated different concentrations of freeze-dried propolis (FDP; 0%–0.4%) and stored for various durations (0, 30, 60, and 90 days). Both FDP and storage time (ST) had significant effects (p < 0.01) on the quality control indicators (QCIs) of frozen FBs, with ST having a more significant effect than FDP on the QCI changes. A numerical optimization process determined that the optimal values of ST and FDP were approximately 27 days and 0.30 g/[100 g of fish paste], respectively. The coefficient of determination (R2) values for the QCIs of frozen FBs in the ANN model were 0.9657 for PV, 0.9753 for TVB-N, and 0.9872 for TVC. These values were slightly lower in the RSM model, 0.9717 for PV, 0.9603 for TVB-N, and 0.9861 for TVC. Overall, the ANN model with a 2-13-3 topology (13 neurons in the first hidden layer) showed greater potential for prediction of FB quality during frozen storage and was found to be the more efficient method.