PoliGuilt: Two level guilt detection from social media texts

IF 7.5 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Abdul Gafar Manuel Meque, Fazlourrahman Balouchzahi, Alexander Gelbukh, Grigori Sidorov
{"title":"PoliGuilt: Two level guilt detection from social media texts","authors":"Abdul Gafar Manuel Meque,&nbsp;Fazlourrahman Balouchzahi,&nbsp;Alexander Gelbukh,&nbsp;Grigori Sidorov","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Guilt, a multifaceted emotion stemming from the realization of causing harm, intertwines with various aspects of human psychology and social interaction. This paper delves into the nature of guilt by developing an annotated dataset of 3,304 posts. Guilt detection is approached as a two-level classification task: first, distinguishing between guilt and non-guilt, and then categorizing guilt into the types “Anticipatory”, “Reactive”, and “Existential” based on psychological frameworks. Exploratory analyses are conducted to examine the contributions of post titles, self-text, and their combination as inputs to guilt detection algorithms. Various learning approaches were employed, including traditional machine learning, deep learning models, and transformers, to ensure quality and efficacy. The findings indicate that while simple methods using only unigrams can distinguish between texts expressing guilt and those that do not, they struggle with fine-grained categorization of guilt types. Additionally, deep learning models and transformers, especially when utilizing contextual information from longer texts and a combination of titles and self-texts, show greater success in capturing the context of the text. Notably, the RoBERTa-base model achieved average F1 scores of 0.7599 for binary classification and 0.7394 for multiclass classification, outperforming all other experiments when combining the title and self-text.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50461,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems with Applications","volume":"277 ","pages":"Article 127187"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417425008097","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Guilt, a multifaceted emotion stemming from the realization of causing harm, intertwines with various aspects of human psychology and social interaction. This paper delves into the nature of guilt by developing an annotated dataset of 3,304 posts. Guilt detection is approached as a two-level classification task: first, distinguishing between guilt and non-guilt, and then categorizing guilt into the types “Anticipatory”, “Reactive”, and “Existential” based on psychological frameworks. Exploratory analyses are conducted to examine the contributions of post titles, self-text, and their combination as inputs to guilt detection algorithms. Various learning approaches were employed, including traditional machine learning, deep learning models, and transformers, to ensure quality and efficacy. The findings indicate that while simple methods using only unigrams can distinguish between texts expressing guilt and those that do not, they struggle with fine-grained categorization of guilt types. Additionally, deep learning models and transformers, especially when utilizing contextual information from longer texts and a combination of titles and self-texts, show greater success in capturing the context of the text. Notably, the RoBERTa-base model achieved average F1 scores of 0.7599 for binary classification and 0.7394 for multiclass classification, outperforming all other experiments when combining the title and self-text.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Systems with Applications
Expert Systems with Applications 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
10.60%
发文量
2045
审稿时长
8.7 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems With Applications is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information on expert and intelligent systems used globally in industry, government, and universities. The journal emphasizes original papers covering the design, development, testing, implementation, and management of these systems, offering practical guidelines. It spans various sectors such as finance, engineering, marketing, law, project management, information management, medicine, and more. The journal also welcomes papers on multi-agent systems, knowledge management, neural networks, knowledge discovery, data mining, and other related areas, excluding applications to military/defense systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信