Learning from practice - A rapid review of climate resilient and low carbon health systems - Case studies in six western pacific countries

Patricia Nayna Schwerdtle , Elise Moo , Crystal Pae , Enkhtsetseg Shinee , Johannah Wegerdt , Akeem Ali , Meelan Thondoo , Kathryn Bowen
{"title":"Learning from practice - A rapid review of climate resilient and low carbon health systems - Case studies in six western pacific countries","authors":"Patricia Nayna Schwerdtle ,&nbsp;Elise Moo ,&nbsp;Crystal Pae ,&nbsp;Enkhtsetseg Shinee ,&nbsp;Johannah Wegerdt ,&nbsp;Akeem Ali ,&nbsp;Meelan Thondoo ,&nbsp;Kathryn Bowen","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2024.100376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>As climate change impacts intensify, health systems have the double responsibility of building resilience while reducing their carbon footprint. This rapid review assessed case studies of interventions implemented towards climate resilient and low carbon health systems in six Western-Pacific countries (Australia, Fiji, South Korea, Laos, Mongolia, and Viet Nam).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a rapid review of academic and grey literature. Framework analysis was applied to map case study interventions against the World Health Organization's Operational Framework for Climate Resilient (CR) and Low Carbon (LC) Health Systems.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 43 case studies from a yield of 605 documents. The majority of interventions were classified as LC (<em>n</em> = 25), followed by those integrating CR and LC (<em>n</em> = 10), and CR only (<em>n</em> = 8). Geographically, the majority of case studies were from Australia (<em>n</em> = 28), followed by Viet Nam (<em>n</em> = 5), Fiji (<em>n</em> = 4), Laos (<em>n</em> = 3), South Korea (<em>n</em> = 2) and Mongolia (<em>n</em> = 1). Additional implementation characteristics included co-benefits (<em>n</em> = 30), evaluation criteria (<em>n</em> = 23), barriers (<em>n</em> = 23) and enablers (<em>n</em> = 20). No studies reported implementation costs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review highlights a significant gap in published evidence on the practical application of the WHO Operational Framework for Climate-Resilient and Low-Carbon (CR and LC) Health Systems, underscoring the urgent need for further research, documentation, and dissemination of real-world implementation experiences. While we identified numerous co-benefits and emerging considerations for community engagement, the scarcity of cost-benefit analyses limits the ability to determine the most cost-effective investments. A rapid transition from fragmented mitigation efforts to comprehensive, system-wide strategies for resilience and decarbonization is essential to drive transformative change in the health sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278224000798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

As climate change impacts intensify, health systems have the double responsibility of building resilience while reducing their carbon footprint. This rapid review assessed case studies of interventions implemented towards climate resilient and low carbon health systems in six Western-Pacific countries (Australia, Fiji, South Korea, Laos, Mongolia, and Viet Nam).

Methods

We conducted a rapid review of academic and grey literature. Framework analysis was applied to map case study interventions against the World Health Organization's Operational Framework for Climate Resilient (CR) and Low Carbon (LC) Health Systems.

Results

We identified 43 case studies from a yield of 605 documents. The majority of interventions were classified as LC (n = 25), followed by those integrating CR and LC (n = 10), and CR only (n = 8). Geographically, the majority of case studies were from Australia (n = 28), followed by Viet Nam (n = 5), Fiji (n = 4), Laos (n = 3), South Korea (n = 2) and Mongolia (n = 1). Additional implementation characteristics included co-benefits (n = 30), evaluation criteria (n = 23), barriers (n = 23) and enablers (n = 20). No studies reported implementation costs.

Conclusion

This review highlights a significant gap in published evidence on the practical application of the WHO Operational Framework for Climate-Resilient and Low-Carbon (CR and LC) Health Systems, underscoring the urgent need for further research, documentation, and dissemination of real-world implementation experiences. While we identified numerous co-benefits and emerging considerations for community engagement, the scarcity of cost-benefit analyses limits the ability to determine the most cost-effective investments. A rapid transition from fragmented mitigation efforts to comprehensive, system-wide strategies for resilience and decarbonization is essential to drive transformative change in the health sector.
从实践中学习-对气候适应型和低碳卫生系统的快速审查-六个西太平洋国家的案例研究
背景:随着气候变化影响的加剧,卫生系统肩负着在减少碳足迹的同时建立抵御力的双重责任。本快速综述评估了六个西太平洋国家(澳大利亚、斐济、韩国、老挝、蒙古和越南)实施的气候适应型和低碳卫生系统干预措施的案例研究。方法快速查阅学术文献和灰色文献。框架分析应用于世界卫生组织的气候适应型(CR)和低碳(LC)卫生系统业务框架来绘制案例研究干预措施图。结果我们从605份文献中鉴定出43份病例研究。大多数干预分为LC (n = 25),其次是集成CR和LC (n = 10),和CR (n = 8)。地理位置,大部分的案例研究来自澳大利亚(n = 28),其次是越南(n = 5),斐济(n = 4),老挝(n = 3),韩国(n = 2)和蒙古(n = 1)。额外的实现特征包括效益(n = 30),评估标准(n = 23),障碍(n = 23)和推动者(n = 20)。没有研究报告执行费用。本综述强调,关于世卫组织气候适应型和低碳卫生系统业务框架实际应用的已发表证据存在重大差距,强调迫切需要进一步研究、记录和传播现实世界的实施经验。虽然我们确定了许多共同利益和社区参与的新考虑因素,但成本效益分析的缺乏限制了确定最具成本效益投资的能力。从零散的缓解努力迅速过渡到全面的全系统复原力和脱碳战略,对于推动卫生部门的变革至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信