Sniffing for fun: Evaluating the effect of olfactory enrichment on cats’ toy preference and interaction

IF 2.2 2区农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE

Applied Animal Behaviour Science Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106592

Emily Webberson , Anastasia C. Stellato , Kristina A. O’Hanley , Lingna Zhang , Edgar O. Aviles-Rosa

{"title":"Sniffing for fun: Evaluating the effect of olfactory enrichment on cats’ toy preference and interaction","authors":"Emily Webberson , Anastasia C. Stellato , Kristina A. O’Hanley , Lingna Zhang , Edgar O. Aviles-Rosa","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Play is a critical natural behavior in domestic cats. Toys and olfactory enrichment are common methods used to encourage play; however, no research has previously evaluated how olfactory enrichment affects toy interaction in cats. We hypothesized that the addition of cats’ preferred odor to a toy would increase toy interaction. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate if adding cats’ preferred odor to moving or stationary toys increased toy interaction. Pet cats (N = 31) participated in three, 5-minute free operant preference assessments where we first evaluated their preferred odor from a set of three different odors (i.e., catnip, silver vine, and Feliway®) and a control (i.e., unscented) and subsequently evaluated their interaction time with a moving or stationary toy with and without their preferred odor, independently. Cats’ behavior during the different preference tests was video recorded and the amount of time they interacted with the testing stimulus was measured. Preference for an odor or a toy was defined as the stimulus that received the most interaction time. Cats interacted with catnip (85.24 s; 95 % CI [59.64, 110.85]) and silver vine (57.99 s; 95 % CI [35.32, 80.66]) more than with the control (3.36 s; 95 % CI [0.98, 5.75]) and Feliway® (8.11 s; 95 % CI [4.24, 11.97]). Although there was no statistical difference, more cats showed a preference for catnip (<em>n</em> = 19) than silver vine (<em>n</em> = 12). Subsequently, each cat’s preferred odor (catnip or silver vine) was added to moving and stationary toys to evaluate the effect of olfactory enrichment on toy interaction. A linear mixed model was used to assess the effect of odor (scented vs unscented), toy type (stationary vs moving) and their interaction on the amount of time cats interacted with the toys. Cats interacted significantly more with moving toys, whether scented (59.04 s; 95 % CI [28.27, 122.14]) or unscented (58.24 s; 95 % CI [27.88, 120.50]), compared to unscented stationary toys (12.27 s; 95 % CI [5.47, 26.21]). Cats interacted statistically longer with scented stationary toys (38.01 s; 95 % CI [18.02, 79.02]) than with unscented stationary toys, but their interaction with scented stationary toys did not statistically differ from their interaction with scented or unscented moving toys. These results indicate that cats prefer moving and scented stationary toys compared to unscented stationary toys. Our results highlight that using olfactory enrichment is a simple method to encourage interaction with stationary toys and play behavior to support cat welfare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"285 ","pages":"Article 106592"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125000905","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Play is a critical natural behavior in domestic cats. Toys and olfactory enrichment are common methods used to encourage play; however, no research has previously evaluated how olfactory enrichment affects toy interaction in cats. We hypothesized that the addition of cats’ preferred odor to a toy would increase toy interaction. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate if adding cats’ preferred odor to moving or stationary toys increased toy interaction. Pet cats (N = 31) participated in three, 5-minute free operant preference assessments where we first evaluated their preferred odor from a set of three different odors (i.e., catnip, silver vine, and Feliway®) and a control (i.e., unscented) and subsequently evaluated their interaction time with a moving or stationary toy with and without their preferred odor, independently. Cats’ behavior during the different preference tests was video recorded and the amount of time they interacted with the testing stimulus was measured. Preference for an odor or a toy was defined as the stimulus that received the most interaction time. Cats interacted with catnip (85.24 s; 95 % CI [59.64, 110.85]) and silver vine (57.99 s; 95 % CI [35.32, 80.66]) more than with the control (3.36 s; 95 % CI [0.98, 5.75]) and Feliway® (8.11 s; 95 % CI [4.24, 11.97]). Although there was no statistical difference, more cats showed a preference for catnip (n = 19) than silver vine (n = 12). Subsequently, each cat’s preferred odor (catnip or silver vine) was added to moving and stationary toys to evaluate the effect of olfactory enrichment on toy interaction. A linear mixed model was used to assess the effect of odor (scented vs unscented), toy type (stationary vs moving) and their interaction on the amount of time cats interacted with the toys. Cats interacted significantly more with moving toys, whether scented (59.04 s; 95 % CI [28.27, 122.14]) or unscented (58.24 s; 95 % CI [27.88, 120.50]), compared to unscented stationary toys (12.27 s; 95 % CI [5.47, 26.21]). Cats interacted statistically longer with scented stationary toys (38.01 s; 95 % CI [18.02, 79.02]) than with unscented stationary toys, but their interaction with scented stationary toys did not statistically differ from their interaction with scented or unscented moving toys. These results indicate that cats prefer moving and scented stationary toys compared to unscented stationary toys. Our results highlight that using olfactory enrichment is a simple method to encourage interaction with stationary toys and play behavior to support cat welfare.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

21.70%

发文量

191

审稿时长

18.1 weeks

期刊介绍： This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements