An extended multi-criteria group decision-making method based on preference ranking under Z-number environments

IF 8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Jian Li , Yuanyuan Xiang , Honggang Peng , Jianqiang Wang
{"title":"An extended multi-criteria group decision-making method based on preference ranking under Z-number environments","authors":"Jian Li ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Xiang ,&nbsp;Honggang Peng ,&nbsp;Jianqiang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Compared with traditional fuzzy numbers, using Z-numbers to illustrate fuzzy events offers two key advantages. It makes fuzzy events more intuitive for decision-makers, and the second component of Z-numbers acts as a measure of the reliability of the first component. While significant progress has been made on Z-numbers, from the theoretical and practical perspectives, some gaps remain. For example, scholars have seldom focused on the likelihood of Z-numbers, most existing decision-making methods with Z-numbers rarely consider the consensus-reaching processes, and little has been reported on the superior ordering methods in the Z-number environment. To overcome these limitations, first, the likelihood of Z-numbers is defined in combination with the preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) type V preference function. Second, the ordering rules for PROMETHEE are discussed. Then, a procedure of the feedback-adjustment method is introduced to help the consensus level of group-alternative ranking reach the threshold. On these bases, an extended PROMETHEE multi-criteria group decision-making method with Z-numbers is proposed. Finally, to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method, we examined an intelligent medical-diagnostic-system selection problem and conducted a comparison analysis. We applied the Z-number PROMETHEE approach to a challenging case study requiring a dual-data-driven application. Furthermore, the study suggests future directions for improving the proposed framework in other related contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50523,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 110573"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197625005731","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compared with traditional fuzzy numbers, using Z-numbers to illustrate fuzzy events offers two key advantages. It makes fuzzy events more intuitive for decision-makers, and the second component of Z-numbers acts as a measure of the reliability of the first component. While significant progress has been made on Z-numbers, from the theoretical and practical perspectives, some gaps remain. For example, scholars have seldom focused on the likelihood of Z-numbers, most existing decision-making methods with Z-numbers rarely consider the consensus-reaching processes, and little has been reported on the superior ordering methods in the Z-number environment. To overcome these limitations, first, the likelihood of Z-numbers is defined in combination with the preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) type V preference function. Second, the ordering rules for PROMETHEE are discussed. Then, a procedure of the feedback-adjustment method is introduced to help the consensus level of group-alternative ranking reach the threshold. On these bases, an extended PROMETHEE multi-criteria group decision-making method with Z-numbers is proposed. Finally, to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method, we examined an intelligent medical-diagnostic-system selection problem and conducted a comparison analysis. We applied the Z-number PROMETHEE approach to a challenging case study requiring a dual-data-driven application. Furthermore, the study suggests future directions for improving the proposed framework in other related contexts.
z数环境下基于偏好排序的扩展多准则群体决策方法
与传统模糊数相比,使用z数来描述模糊事件具有两个关键优势。它使模糊事件对决策者来说更加直观,z数的第二个组成部分作为衡量第一个组成部分的可靠性。虽然在z数方面取得了重大进展,但从理论和实践的角度来看,仍然存在一些差距。例如,学者们很少关注z数的可能性,大多数现有的z数决策方法很少考虑达成共识的过程,很少有关于z数环境下优越排序方法的报道。为了克服这些限制,首先,结合富集评价偏好排序组织方法(PROMETHEE) V型偏好函数定义z数的似然。其次,讨论了PROMETHEE的排序规则。然后,引入了一种反馈调整方法,使群体备选排序的共识水平达到阈值。在此基础上,提出了一种扩展的带有z数的PROMETHEE多准则群决策方法。最后,为了验证所提方法的可行性和有效性,我们以一个智能医疗诊断系统选择问题为例进行了对比分析。我们将Z-number PROMETHEE方法应用于一个具有挑战性的案例研究,该案例需要双数据驱动的应用程序。此外,该研究还提出了在其他相关背景下改进拟议框架的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
505
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is pivotal in driving the fourth industrial revolution, witnessing remarkable advancements across various machine learning methodologies. AI techniques have become indispensable tools for practicing engineers, enabling them to tackle previously insurmountable challenges. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence serves as a global platform for the swift dissemination of research elucidating the practical application of AI methods across all engineering disciplines. Submitted papers are expected to present novel aspects of AI utilized in real-world engineering applications, validated using publicly available datasets to ensure the replicability of research outcomes. Join us in exploring the transformative potential of AI in engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信