The assessment of cognitive function and medical fitness to drive in older adults: A qualitative study with general practitioners

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Stefanidis K.B , Summers M.J. , Clark M.
{"title":"The assessment of cognitive function and medical fitness to drive in older adults: A qualitative study with general practitioners","authors":"Stefanidis K.B ,&nbsp;Summers M.J. ,&nbsp;Clark M.","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The increasing ageing population has led to a pressing need to develop standardised measures and guidelines for assessing cognitive fitness to drive. With the onus of annual medical assessments for driving falling on general medical practitioners (GPs) in Australia, there is a need to explore their experiences and opinions regarding such assessments. This qualitative study explored the perceptions, opinions and experiences of GPs regarding the assessment of older drivers, with a particular emphasis on the assessment of cognitive function.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Six registered GPs within Australia participated in an anonymous telephone interview. Following a constructivist grounded theory approach, themes were generated using gerunds.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 5 themes were developed from the data: (1) pre-empting: planting the seed and softening the blow, (2) maintaining the doctor-patient relationship and deflecting pressure, (3) satisficing: doing the best we can with imperfect knowledge whilst balancing competing demands, (4) learning from experience versus formal training and (5) seeking standardised procedures and policy guidance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings highlight that medical assessments for driving are complex and challenging for GPs, particularly in terms of screening for cognitive fitness to drive. The need for evidence-based approaches for assessing cognitive fitness to drive, standardised procedures and formal training for cognitive assessments, were emphasised.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 102020"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The increasing ageing population has led to a pressing need to develop standardised measures and guidelines for assessing cognitive fitness to drive. With the onus of annual medical assessments for driving falling on general medical practitioners (GPs) in Australia, there is a need to explore their experiences and opinions regarding such assessments. This qualitative study explored the perceptions, opinions and experiences of GPs regarding the assessment of older drivers, with a particular emphasis on the assessment of cognitive function.

Methods

Six registered GPs within Australia participated in an anonymous telephone interview. Following a constructivist grounded theory approach, themes were generated using gerunds.

Results

A total of 5 themes were developed from the data: (1) pre-empting: planting the seed and softening the blow, (2) maintaining the doctor-patient relationship and deflecting pressure, (3) satisficing: doing the best we can with imperfect knowledge whilst balancing competing demands, (4) learning from experience versus formal training and (5) seeking standardised procedures and policy guidance.

Conclusions

The findings highlight that medical assessments for driving are complex and challenging for GPs, particularly in terms of screening for cognitive fitness to drive. The need for evidence-based approaches for assessing cognitive fitness to drive, standardised procedures and formal training for cognitive assessments, were emphasised.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信