Yijun Zhou , Benedikt Helgason , Stephen J. Ferguson , Cecilia Persson
{"title":"Optimization of primary screw stability in Trabecular bone using neural network-based models","authors":"Yijun Zhou , Benedikt Helgason , Stephen J. Ferguson , Cecilia Persson","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><div>Screw implant stability in bone is crucial to the success of many orthopaedic procedures, yet the relationship between screw design parameters and specific bone characteristics remains underexplored. This study aims to optimize screw designs to enhance primary stability by leveraging subject-specific bone data and advanced surrogate modelling techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this study, 2880 screw pull-out simulations were conducted to assess primary screw stability by analysing pull-out stiffness and strength. The resulting dataset was used to develop surrogate models using multiple linear regression, random forest, and neural networks (NN). An optimization process was then applied to find optimal screw designs for 80 distinct trabecular bone specimens, in terms of inner diameter, pitch, and thread angle.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The models, trained with various input parameters, including bone morphological parameters and computed tomography images, promisingly predicted the results of the simulations. The prediction errors varied by model type, with multiple linear regression yielding approximately 12 % error, while non-linear machine learning models achieved lower errors, ranging between 2–6 %. The series of subsequent optimization tasks provided optimized screw designs showing statistically significant improvements in pull-out stiffness and strength compared to the average screw designs (approximately 16 and 14 %, respectively). This even though our study focused only on screw design parameters that generally have a smaller impact on stability compared to factors such as screw outer diameter and insertion depth.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Multiple linear regression models were found to be insufficient for generating optimized screw configurations, and more complex surrogate models, such as NN, are needed. It could be concluded that different trabecular bone morphologies can benefit from distinct optimal screw designs. The insights gained from this study could have implications for the development of patient-specific orthopaedic treatments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10624,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","volume":"264 ","pages":"Article 108720"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260725001373","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Objective
Screw implant stability in bone is crucial to the success of many orthopaedic procedures, yet the relationship between screw design parameters and specific bone characteristics remains underexplored. This study aims to optimize screw designs to enhance primary stability by leveraging subject-specific bone data and advanced surrogate modelling techniques.
Methods
In this study, 2880 screw pull-out simulations were conducted to assess primary screw stability by analysing pull-out stiffness and strength. The resulting dataset was used to develop surrogate models using multiple linear regression, random forest, and neural networks (NN). An optimization process was then applied to find optimal screw designs for 80 distinct trabecular bone specimens, in terms of inner diameter, pitch, and thread angle.
Results
The models, trained with various input parameters, including bone morphological parameters and computed tomography images, promisingly predicted the results of the simulations. The prediction errors varied by model type, with multiple linear regression yielding approximately 12 % error, while non-linear machine learning models achieved lower errors, ranging between 2–6 %. The series of subsequent optimization tasks provided optimized screw designs showing statistically significant improvements in pull-out stiffness and strength compared to the average screw designs (approximately 16 and 14 %, respectively). This even though our study focused only on screw design parameters that generally have a smaller impact on stability compared to factors such as screw outer diameter and insertion depth.
Conclusions
Multiple linear regression models were found to be insufficient for generating optimized screw configurations, and more complex surrogate models, such as NN, are needed. It could be concluded that different trabecular bone morphologies can benefit from distinct optimal screw designs. The insights gained from this study could have implications for the development of patient-specific orthopaedic treatments.
期刊介绍:
To encourage the development of formal computing methods, and their application in biomedical research and medical practice, by illustration of fundamental principles in biomedical informatics research; to stimulate basic research into application software design; to report the state of research of biomedical information processing projects; to report new computer methodologies applied in biomedical areas; the eventual distribution of demonstrable software to avoid duplication of effort; to provide a forum for discussion and improvement of existing software; to optimize contact between national organizations and regional user groups by promoting an international exchange of information on formal methods, standards and software in biomedicine.
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine covers computing methodology and software systems derived from computing science for implementation in all aspects of biomedical research and medical practice. It is designed to serve: biochemists; biologists; geneticists; immunologists; neuroscientists; pharmacologists; toxicologists; clinicians; epidemiologists; psychiatrists; psychologists; cardiologists; chemists; (radio)physicists; computer scientists; programmers and systems analysts; biomedical, clinical, electrical and other engineers; teachers of medical informatics and users of educational software.