Streamlining data recording through optical character recognition: a prospective multi-center study in intensive care units

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Prompak Nitayavardhana, Keibun Liu, Kiyomitsu Fukaguchi, Mineto Fujisawa, Itaru Koike, Aina Tominaga, Yuta Iwamoto, Tadahiro Goto, Jacky Y. Suen, John F. Fraser, Pauline Yeung Ng
{"title":"Streamlining data recording through optical character recognition: a prospective multi-center study in intensive care units","authors":"Prompak Nitayavardhana, Keibun Liu, Kiyomitsu Fukaguchi, Mineto Fujisawa, Itaru Koike, Aina Tominaga, Yuta Iwamoto, Tadahiro Goto, Jacky Y. Suen, John F. Fraser, Pauline Yeung Ng","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05347-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The manual entry of data into large patient databases requires significant resources and time. It is possible that a system that is enhanced with the technology of optical character recognition (OCR) can facilitate data entry, reduce data entry errors, and decrease the burden on healthcare personnel. This was a prospective multi-center observational study across intensive care units (ICU) in 3 countries. Subjects were critically-ill and required invasive mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal life support. Clinical photos from various medical devices were uploaded using an OCR-enhanced case record form. The degree of data completeness, data accuracy, and time saved in entering data were compared with conventional manual data entry. The OCR-based system was developed with 868 photos and validated with 469 photos. In independent validation by 8 untrained personnel involving 1018 data points, the overall data completeness was 98.5% (range 98.2–100%), while the overall data accuracy was 96.9% (range 95.3–100%). It significantly reduced data entry time compared to manual entry (mean reduction 43.9% [range 27.0–1.1%]). The average data entry time needed per patient were 3.4 (range 1.2–5.9) minutes with the OCR-based system, compared with 6.0 (range 2.2–8.1) minutes with manual data entry. Users reported high satisfaction with the tool, with an overall recommendation rate of 4.25 ± 1.04 (maximum of 5). An OCR-based data entry system can effectively and efficiently facilitate data entry into clinical databases, making it a promising tool for future clinical data management. Wider uptake of these systems should be encouraged to better understand their strengths and limitations in both clinical and research settings.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05347-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The manual entry of data into large patient databases requires significant resources and time. It is possible that a system that is enhanced with the technology of optical character recognition (OCR) can facilitate data entry, reduce data entry errors, and decrease the burden on healthcare personnel. This was a prospective multi-center observational study across intensive care units (ICU) in 3 countries. Subjects were critically-ill and required invasive mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal life support. Clinical photos from various medical devices were uploaded using an OCR-enhanced case record form. The degree of data completeness, data accuracy, and time saved in entering data were compared with conventional manual data entry. The OCR-based system was developed with 868 photos and validated with 469 photos. In independent validation by 8 untrained personnel involving 1018 data points, the overall data completeness was 98.5% (range 98.2–100%), while the overall data accuracy was 96.9% (range 95.3–100%). It significantly reduced data entry time compared to manual entry (mean reduction 43.9% [range 27.0–1.1%]). The average data entry time needed per patient were 3.4 (range 1.2–5.9) minutes with the OCR-based system, compared with 6.0 (range 2.2–8.1) minutes with manual data entry. Users reported high satisfaction with the tool, with an overall recommendation rate of 4.25 ± 1.04 (maximum of 5). An OCR-based data entry system can effectively and efficiently facilitate data entry into clinical databases, making it a promising tool for future clinical data management. Wider uptake of these systems should be encouraged to better understand their strengths and limitations in both clinical and research settings.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信