A robotic treatment delivery system to facilitate dynamic conformal synchrotron radiotherapy.

Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-03-16 DOI:10.1002/mp.17750
Micah J Barnes, Nader Afshar, Taran Batty, Tom Fiala, Matthew Cameron, Daniel Hausermann, Nicholas Hardcastle, Michael Lerch
{"title":"A robotic treatment delivery system to facilitate dynamic conformal synchrotron radiotherapy.","authors":"Micah J Barnes, Nader Afshar, Taran Batty, Tom Fiala, Matthew Cameron, Daniel Hausermann, Nicholas Hardcastle, Michael Lerch","doi":"10.1002/mp.17750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In clinical radiotherapy, the patient remains static during treatment and only the source is dynamically manipulated. In synchrotron radiotherapy, the beam is fixed, and is horizontally wide and vertically small, requiring the patient to be moved through the beam to ensure full target coverage, while shaping the field to conform to the target. No clinical system exists that performs both dynamic motion of the patient and dynamic shaping of the beam.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We developed and tested a new dynamic treatment delivery system capable of delivering conformal fields with a robotic patient positioning system for use on the Imaging and Medical Beamline (IMBL) at the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Australian Synchrotron.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An industrial robotic manipulator was modified to enable dynamic radiotherapy treatments on IMBL. The robot, combined with a carbon-fiber treatment couch-top and a recently developed dynamic collimator, formed the basis of the new treatment delivery system. To synchronize the motions of the robot and collimator, a real-time, hardware-based event-handling system was utilized. To test the system, a ball bearing in a medical physics phantom was treated with circular fields ranging from 5 to 40 mm in diameter and at treatment speeds from 2 to 50 mm  <math> <semantics><msup><mi>s</mi> <mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn></mrow> </msup> <annotation>${\\rm s}^{-1}$</annotation></semantics> </math> . The position of the ball bearing was compared to the center of the circular fields and the positional and temporal accuracy of the treatment delivery system was assessed, and appropriate treatment margins for the system were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vertical position of the ball bearing varied with treatment delivery speed ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>1.06</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mi>to</mi> <mspace></mspace> <mn>0.93</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mi>mm</mi></mrow> <annotation>$-1.06 \\, {\\rm to}\\, 0.93 \\,\\mathrm{mm}$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) while the horizontal position remained consistent ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mi>to</mi> <mspace></mspace> <mn>0.09</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mi>mm</mi></mrow> <annotation>$-0.05 \\,{\\rm to}\\, 0.09 \\,\\mathrm{mm}$</annotation></semantics> </math> ). The time-delay between the robot and the collimator remained consistent ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>35.5</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mi>ms</mi> <mspace></mspace> <mi>to</mi> <mspace></mspace> <mn>18.5</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mi>ms</mi></mrow> <annotation>$-35.5 \\,\\mathrm{ms}\\,{\\rm to}\\, 18.5 \\,\\mathrm{ms}$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) at treatment speeds above <math> <semantics><mrow><mn>2</mn> <mspace></mspace> <msup><mi>mms</mi> <mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$2 \\,\\mathrm{mm s}^{-1}$</annotation></semantics> </math> . Data at <math> <semantics><mrow><mn>2</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mi>mm</mi> <msup><mi>s</mi> <mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$2 \\,\\mathrm{mm}\\mathrm{s}^{-1}$</annotation></semantics> </math> was right at the edge of both the robot capabilities and the analysis technique, and had larger variations in timing ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mn>0.0</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mi>ms</mi> <mspace></mspace> <mi>to</mi> <mspace></mspace> <mn>57.9</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mi>ms</mi></mrow> <annotation>$0.0 \\,\\mathrm{ms}\\,{\\rm to}\\, 57.9 \\,\\mathrm{ms}$</annotation></semantics> </math> ). Horizontal margins of <math> <semantics><mrow><mn>0.51</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mi>mm</mi></mrow> <annotation>$0.51 \\,\\mathrm{mm}$</annotation></semantics> </math> and vertical margins of up to <math> <semantics><mrow><mn>2.3</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mi>mm</mi></mrow> <annotation>$2.3 \\,\\mathrm{mm}$</annotation></semantics> </math> were calculated for the treatment delivery system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have implemented the first robotic treatment delivery system for synchrotron radiotherapy treatments. The largest errors were observed in the direction of motion of the patient through the beam and with future improvements, can be reduced. The system was both accurate and repeatable and is ready to support future treatments on IMBL.</p>","PeriodicalId":94136,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In clinical radiotherapy, the patient remains static during treatment and only the source is dynamically manipulated. In synchrotron radiotherapy, the beam is fixed, and is horizontally wide and vertically small, requiring the patient to be moved through the beam to ensure full target coverage, while shaping the field to conform to the target. No clinical system exists that performs both dynamic motion of the patient and dynamic shaping of the beam.

Purpose: We developed and tested a new dynamic treatment delivery system capable of delivering conformal fields with a robotic patient positioning system for use on the Imaging and Medical Beamline (IMBL) at the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Australian Synchrotron.

Methods: An industrial robotic manipulator was modified to enable dynamic radiotherapy treatments on IMBL. The robot, combined with a carbon-fiber treatment couch-top and a recently developed dynamic collimator, formed the basis of the new treatment delivery system. To synchronize the motions of the robot and collimator, a real-time, hardware-based event-handling system was utilized. To test the system, a ball bearing in a medical physics phantom was treated with circular fields ranging from 5 to 40 mm in diameter and at treatment speeds from 2 to 50 mm  s - 1 ${\rm s}^{-1}$ . The position of the ball bearing was compared to the center of the circular fields and the positional and temporal accuracy of the treatment delivery system was assessed, and appropriate treatment margins for the system were determined.

Results: The vertical position of the ball bearing varied with treatment delivery speed ( - 1.06 to 0.93 mm $-1.06 \, {\rm to}\, 0.93 \,\mathrm{mm}$ ) while the horizontal position remained consistent ( - 0.05 to 0.09 mm $-0.05 \,{\rm to}\, 0.09 \,\mathrm{mm}$ ). The time-delay between the robot and the collimator remained consistent ( - 35.5 ms to 18.5 ms $-35.5 \,\mathrm{ms}\,{\rm to}\, 18.5 \,\mathrm{ms}$ ) at treatment speeds above 2 mms - 1 $2 \,\mathrm{mm s}^{-1}$ . Data at 2 mm s - 1 $2 \,\mathrm{mm}\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ was right at the edge of both the robot capabilities and the analysis technique, and had larger variations in timing ( 0.0 ms to 57.9 ms $0.0 \,\mathrm{ms}\,{\rm to}\, 57.9 \,\mathrm{ms}$ ). Horizontal margins of 0.51 mm $0.51 \,\mathrm{mm}$ and vertical margins of up to 2.3 mm $2.3 \,\mathrm{mm}$ were calculated for the treatment delivery system.

Conclusions: We have implemented the first robotic treatment delivery system for synchrotron radiotherapy treatments. The largest errors were observed in the direction of motion of the patient through the beam and with future improvements, can be reduced. The system was both accurate and repeatable and is ready to support future treatments on IMBL.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信