Long-term exposure to low-level crystalline silica and risk assessment of silicosis: a cohort study.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Thorax Pub Date : 2025-03-16 DOI:10.1136/thorax-2024-222660
Dongming Wang, Wenzhen Li, Min Zhou, Jixuan Ma, Yanjun Guo, Weihong Chen
{"title":"Long-term exposure to low-level crystalline silica and risk assessment of silicosis: a cohort study.","authors":"Dongming Wang, Wenzhen Li, Min Zhou, Jixuan Ma, Yanjun Guo, Weihong Chen","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2024-222660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-level exposure to crystalline silica dust is the key factor in silicosis. Long-term exposure to low-level silica dust, for example, lower than that in occupational exposure limits, still needs to be studied for their risk of silicosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 697 workers were included from a cohort in China. Low-level silica dust exposure was defined as those having a lifetime mean silica dust concentration equal to or under permissible exposure limits, including 0.05 mg/m<sup>3</sup>, 0.10 mg/m<sup>3</sup> and 0.35 mg/m<sup>3</sup>. Cumulative respirable silica dust exposure (CDE) for individual workers was assessed by linking a job-exposure matrix to personal work history.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among those with average exposure level equal to or lower than 0.05 mg/m<sup>3</sup>, compared with the lowest quartile CDE (Q1), the HRs of silicosis were 1.32 (95% CI 0.82 to 2.10) for Q2, 1.87 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.88) for Q3 and 2.00 (95% CI 1.30 to 3.09) for Q4. Among those exposed to 0.10 mg/m<sup>3</sup> or less exposure level, compared with Q1, the HRs were 2.52 (95% CI 1.88 to 3.38) for Q2, 4.08 (95% CI 3.09 to 5.39) for Q3 and 4.02 (95% CI 3.04 to 5.32) for Q4. Among those exposed to 0.35 mg/m<sup>3</sup> or less exposure level, compared with Q1, the HRs were 2.80 (95% CI 2.38 to 3.28) for Q2, 5.76 (95% CI 4.93 to 6.73) for Q3 and 7.14 (95% CI 6.07 to 8.40) for Q4, respectively. Stratified analysis showed that the results and trends did not change with facilities and smoking status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term exposure to low-level silica dust is still associated with a higher risk of silicosis. Control measurements and personal protective equipment should be emphasised to protect the health of workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23284,"journal":{"name":"Thorax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High-level exposure to crystalline silica dust is the key factor in silicosis. Long-term exposure to low-level silica dust, for example, lower than that in occupational exposure limits, still needs to be studied for their risk of silicosis.

Methods: A total of 30 697 workers were included from a cohort in China. Low-level silica dust exposure was defined as those having a lifetime mean silica dust concentration equal to or under permissible exposure limits, including 0.05 mg/m3, 0.10 mg/m3 and 0.35 mg/m3. Cumulative respirable silica dust exposure (CDE) for individual workers was assessed by linking a job-exposure matrix to personal work history.

Results: Among those with average exposure level equal to or lower than 0.05 mg/m3, compared with the lowest quartile CDE (Q1), the HRs of silicosis were 1.32 (95% CI 0.82 to 2.10) for Q2, 1.87 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.88) for Q3 and 2.00 (95% CI 1.30 to 3.09) for Q4. Among those exposed to 0.10 mg/m3 or less exposure level, compared with Q1, the HRs were 2.52 (95% CI 1.88 to 3.38) for Q2, 4.08 (95% CI 3.09 to 5.39) for Q3 and 4.02 (95% CI 3.04 to 5.32) for Q4. Among those exposed to 0.35 mg/m3 or less exposure level, compared with Q1, the HRs were 2.80 (95% CI 2.38 to 3.28) for Q2, 5.76 (95% CI 4.93 to 6.73) for Q3 and 7.14 (95% CI 6.07 to 8.40) for Q4, respectively. Stratified analysis showed that the results and trends did not change with facilities and smoking status.

Conclusion: Long-term exposure to low-level silica dust is still associated with a higher risk of silicosis. Control measurements and personal protective equipment should be emphasised to protect the health of workers.

长期暴露于低水平结晶二氧化硅和矽肺病风险评估:一项队列研究。
背景:高水平暴露于结晶二氧化硅粉尘是矽肺病的关键因素。例如,长期暴露于低于职业暴露限值的低水平二氧化硅粉尘,仍需研究其患矽肺病的风险。方法:在中国共纳入30697名工人。低水平二氧化硅粉尘暴露定义为寿命平均二氧化硅粉尘浓度等于或低于允许暴露限值,包括0.05 mg/m3、0.10 mg/m3和0.35 mg/m3。通过将工作暴露矩阵与个人工作经历联系起来,评估个体工人的累积可呼吸性硅尘暴露(CDE)。结果:与最低四分位数CDE (Q1)相比,在平均暴露水平等于或低于0.05 mg/m3的人群中,第二季度矽肺病的hr为1.32 (95% CI 0.82至2.10),第三季度为1.87 (95% CI 1.22至2.88),第四季度为2.00 (95% CI 1.30至3.09)。在暴露于0.10 mg/m3或更低暴露水平的人群中,与Q1相比,Q2的hr为2.52 (95% CI 1.88至3.38),Q3的hr为4.08 (95% CI 3.09至5.39),Q4的hr为4.02 (95% CI 3.04至5.32)。在暴露于0.35 mg/m3或更低暴露水平的人群中,与Q1相比,Q2的hr分别为2.80 (95% CI 2.38至3.28),Q3的hr为5.76 (95% CI 4.93至6.73),Q4的hr为7.14 (95% CI 6.07至8.40)。分层分析表明,结果和趋势不受设施和吸烟状况的影响。结论:长期暴露于低水平二氧化硅粉尘仍与较高的矽肺病风险相关。应强调控制措施和个人防护装备,以保护工人的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thorax
Thorax 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
197
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Thorax stands as one of the premier respiratory medicine journals globally, featuring clinical and experimental research articles spanning respiratory medicine, pediatrics, immunology, pharmacology, pathology, and surgery. The journal's mission is to publish noteworthy advancements in scientific understanding that are poised to influence clinical practice significantly. This encompasses articles delving into basic and translational mechanisms applicable to clinical material, covering areas such as cell and molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信