{"title":"Long-term exposure to low-level crystalline silica and risk assessment of silicosis: a cohort study.","authors":"Dongming Wang, Wenzhen Li, Min Zhou, Jixuan Ma, Yanjun Guo, Weihong Chen","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2024-222660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-level exposure to crystalline silica dust is the key factor in silicosis. Long-term exposure to low-level silica dust, for example, lower than that in occupational exposure limits, still needs to be studied for their risk of silicosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 697 workers were included from a cohort in China. Low-level silica dust exposure was defined as those having a lifetime mean silica dust concentration equal to or under permissible exposure limits, including 0.05 mg/m<sup>3</sup>, 0.10 mg/m<sup>3</sup> and 0.35 mg/m<sup>3</sup>. Cumulative respirable silica dust exposure (CDE) for individual workers was assessed by linking a job-exposure matrix to personal work history.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among those with average exposure level equal to or lower than 0.05 mg/m<sup>3</sup>, compared with the lowest quartile CDE (Q1), the HRs of silicosis were 1.32 (95% CI 0.82 to 2.10) for Q2, 1.87 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.88) for Q3 and 2.00 (95% CI 1.30 to 3.09) for Q4. Among those exposed to 0.10 mg/m<sup>3</sup> or less exposure level, compared with Q1, the HRs were 2.52 (95% CI 1.88 to 3.38) for Q2, 4.08 (95% CI 3.09 to 5.39) for Q3 and 4.02 (95% CI 3.04 to 5.32) for Q4. Among those exposed to 0.35 mg/m<sup>3</sup> or less exposure level, compared with Q1, the HRs were 2.80 (95% CI 2.38 to 3.28) for Q2, 5.76 (95% CI 4.93 to 6.73) for Q3 and 7.14 (95% CI 6.07 to 8.40) for Q4, respectively. Stratified analysis showed that the results and trends did not change with facilities and smoking status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term exposure to low-level silica dust is still associated with a higher risk of silicosis. Control measurements and personal protective equipment should be emphasised to protect the health of workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23284,"journal":{"name":"Thorax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: High-level exposure to crystalline silica dust is the key factor in silicosis. Long-term exposure to low-level silica dust, for example, lower than that in occupational exposure limits, still needs to be studied for their risk of silicosis.
Methods: A total of 30 697 workers were included from a cohort in China. Low-level silica dust exposure was defined as those having a lifetime mean silica dust concentration equal to or under permissible exposure limits, including 0.05 mg/m3, 0.10 mg/m3 and 0.35 mg/m3. Cumulative respirable silica dust exposure (CDE) for individual workers was assessed by linking a job-exposure matrix to personal work history.
Results: Among those with average exposure level equal to or lower than 0.05 mg/m3, compared with the lowest quartile CDE (Q1), the HRs of silicosis were 1.32 (95% CI 0.82 to 2.10) for Q2, 1.87 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.88) for Q3 and 2.00 (95% CI 1.30 to 3.09) for Q4. Among those exposed to 0.10 mg/m3 or less exposure level, compared with Q1, the HRs were 2.52 (95% CI 1.88 to 3.38) for Q2, 4.08 (95% CI 3.09 to 5.39) for Q3 and 4.02 (95% CI 3.04 to 5.32) for Q4. Among those exposed to 0.35 mg/m3 or less exposure level, compared with Q1, the HRs were 2.80 (95% CI 2.38 to 3.28) for Q2, 5.76 (95% CI 4.93 to 6.73) for Q3 and 7.14 (95% CI 6.07 to 8.40) for Q4, respectively. Stratified analysis showed that the results and trends did not change with facilities and smoking status.
Conclusion: Long-term exposure to low-level silica dust is still associated with a higher risk of silicosis. Control measurements and personal protective equipment should be emphasised to protect the health of workers.
背景:高水平暴露于结晶二氧化硅粉尘是矽肺病的关键因素。例如,长期暴露于低于职业暴露限值的低水平二氧化硅粉尘,仍需研究其患矽肺病的风险。方法:在中国共纳入30697名工人。低水平二氧化硅粉尘暴露定义为寿命平均二氧化硅粉尘浓度等于或低于允许暴露限值,包括0.05 mg/m3、0.10 mg/m3和0.35 mg/m3。通过将工作暴露矩阵与个人工作经历联系起来,评估个体工人的累积可呼吸性硅尘暴露(CDE)。结果:与最低四分位数CDE (Q1)相比,在平均暴露水平等于或低于0.05 mg/m3的人群中,第二季度矽肺病的hr为1.32 (95% CI 0.82至2.10),第三季度为1.87 (95% CI 1.22至2.88),第四季度为2.00 (95% CI 1.30至3.09)。在暴露于0.10 mg/m3或更低暴露水平的人群中,与Q1相比,Q2的hr为2.52 (95% CI 1.88至3.38),Q3的hr为4.08 (95% CI 3.09至5.39),Q4的hr为4.02 (95% CI 3.04至5.32)。在暴露于0.35 mg/m3或更低暴露水平的人群中,与Q1相比,Q2的hr分别为2.80 (95% CI 2.38至3.28),Q3的hr为5.76 (95% CI 4.93至6.73),Q4的hr为7.14 (95% CI 6.07至8.40)。分层分析表明,结果和趋势不受设施和吸烟状况的影响。结论:长期暴露于低水平二氧化硅粉尘仍与较高的矽肺病风险相关。应强调控制措施和个人防护装备,以保护工人的健康。
期刊介绍:
Thorax stands as one of the premier respiratory medicine journals globally, featuring clinical and experimental research articles spanning respiratory medicine, pediatrics, immunology, pharmacology, pathology, and surgery. The journal's mission is to publish noteworthy advancements in scientific understanding that are poised to influence clinical practice significantly. This encompasses articles delving into basic and translational mechanisms applicable to clinical material, covering areas such as cell and molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and immunology.