Detection of Acute Deterioration in Care Home Residents: A Multicenter Qualitative Exploration of Barriers and Enablers

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Margaret MacAndrew, Deepa Sriram, Shirley Chambers, Amy Spooner, Linda Schnitker, Leanne Jack, Patsy Yates, Elizabeth Beattie, Christina Parker
{"title":"Detection of Acute Deterioration in Care Home Residents: A Multicenter Qualitative Exploration of Barriers and Enablers","authors":"Margaret MacAndrew,&nbsp;Deepa Sriram,&nbsp;Shirley Chambers,&nbsp;Amy Spooner,&nbsp;Linda Schnitker,&nbsp;Leanne Jack,&nbsp;Patsy Yates,&nbsp;Elizabeth Beattie,&nbsp;Christina Parker","doi":"10.1111/jnu.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Delay in detecting acute deterioration in older adults in care homes is associated with avoidable hospitalizations and adverse outcomes, including premature death.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Underpinned by the Knowledge to Action Framework, this study aimed to understand the barriers and enablers to direct care staff detecting and responding to the early signs of acute deterioration in care home residents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>Online focus groups or interviews with regulated (registered and enrolled nurses) and unregulated (assistants in nursing and personal care workers) direct care staff from participating care homes were conducted. Homes were recruited using disproportionate stratified random sampling to include metropolitan, inner regional, and outer regional care homes. Interview and focus group recordings were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eighty direct care staff (<i>n</i> = 48 regulated; <i>n</i> = 32 unregulated) from eight care homes participated. Fifteen focus groups (<i>n</i> = 7 unregulated staff, <i>n</i> = 8 regulated staff) and two interviews (<i>n</i> = 1 regulated staff, <i>n</i> = 1 unregulated staff) were conducted between July 2021 and October 2022. Four themes related to the barriers and enablers of detecting and responding to acute deterioration were generated: decision-making within the scope of practice; resource availability; streamlined communication; and teamwork.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings highlight the challenges direct care staff encounter in being able to detect early signs of acute deterioration and implement appropriate care pathways. Perceived barriers and enablers highlighted in this study need to be considered when developing and implementing programs to optimize the timely detection of, and response to, acute deterioration in care homes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Relevance</h3>\n \n <p>Workforce knowledge, experience, and confidence deficits are significant barriers to detecting acute deterioration, while the unique workforce mix in care homes poses additional challenges for the accurate detection of early signs of acute deterioration. Knowing the resident, working as a team, and valuing the contribution of aged care staff and families in managing acute deterioration are enablers to achieving better outcomes for residents experiencing acute deterioration.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":"57 4","pages":"576-586"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jnu.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://sigmapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jnu.70005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Delay in detecting acute deterioration in older adults in care homes is associated with avoidable hospitalizations and adverse outcomes, including premature death.

Objective

Underpinned by the Knowledge to Action Framework, this study aimed to understand the barriers and enablers to direct care staff detecting and responding to the early signs of acute deterioration in care home residents.

Study Design

Online focus groups or interviews with regulated (registered and enrolled nurses) and unregulated (assistants in nursing and personal care workers) direct care staff from participating care homes were conducted. Homes were recruited using disproportionate stratified random sampling to include metropolitan, inner regional, and outer regional care homes. Interview and focus group recordings were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results

Eighty direct care staff (n = 48 regulated; n = 32 unregulated) from eight care homes participated. Fifteen focus groups (n = 7 unregulated staff, n = 8 regulated staff) and two interviews (n = 1 regulated staff, n = 1 unregulated staff) were conducted between July 2021 and October 2022. Four themes related to the barriers and enablers of detecting and responding to acute deterioration were generated: decision-making within the scope of practice; resource availability; streamlined communication; and teamwork.

Conclusion

Findings highlight the challenges direct care staff encounter in being able to detect early signs of acute deterioration and implement appropriate care pathways. Perceived barriers and enablers highlighted in this study need to be considered when developing and implementing programs to optimize the timely detection of, and response to, acute deterioration in care homes.

Clinical Relevance

Workforce knowledge, experience, and confidence deficits are significant barriers to detecting acute deterioration, while the unique workforce mix in care homes poses additional challenges for the accurate detection of early signs of acute deterioration. Knowing the resident, working as a team, and valuing the contribution of aged care staff and families in managing acute deterioration are enablers to achieving better outcomes for residents experiencing acute deterioration.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

护理院居民急性恶化的检测:一项多中心的障碍和促进因素的定性探索。
导读:在养老院中发现老年人急性恶化的延迟与可避免的住院治疗和不良后果(包括过早死亡)有关。目的:在“从知识到行动”框架的基础上,本研究旨在了解指导护理人员发现和应对养老院居民急性恶化早期迹象的障碍和促进因素。研究设计:对参与养老院的受监管(注册和注册护士)和不受监管(护理助理和个人护理工作者)直接护理人员进行在线焦点小组或访谈。家庭被招募使用不成比例的分层随机抽样,包括大都市,内部区域和外部区域养老院。访谈和焦点小组记录逐字转录,并使用归纳主题分析进行分析。结果:80名直接护理人员(n = 48)被规范;N = 32(未规范),来自8家养老院。在2021年7月至2022年10月期间进行了15个焦点小组(n = 7名非管制工作人员,n = 8名管制工作人员)和两次访谈(n = 1名管制工作人员,n = 1名非管制工作人员)。产生了与发现和应对急性恶化的障碍和促进因素有关的四个主题:在实践范围内的决策;资源可用性;流线型的沟通;和团队合作。结论:研究结果突出了直接护理人员在能够发现急性恶化的早期迹象并实施适当的护理途径方面遇到的挑战。在制定和实施方案以优化养老院急性恶化的及时检测和响应时,需要考虑本研究中强调的感知障碍和促进因素。临床相关性:工作人员的知识、经验和信心不足是检测急性恶化的重大障碍,而护理院独特的工作人员组合为准确检测急性恶化的早期迹象带来了额外的挑战。了解住院医生,作为一个团队工作,重视老年护理人员和家庭在管理急性恶化方面的贡献,有助于为经历急性恶化的住院医生取得更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信