Trends for Research on Hard Substrate Colonization by Meiofauna

IF 1.8 4区 生物学 Q3 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Marcos Eduardo Miranda Santos, Débora Spenassato, Ana Maria Volkmer de Azambuja, Jorge Luiz Silva Nunes, Maurício Garcia de Camargo
{"title":"Trends for Research on Hard Substrate Colonization by Meiofauna","authors":"Marcos Eduardo Miranda Santos,&nbsp;Débora Spenassato,&nbsp;Ana Maria Volkmer de Azambuja,&nbsp;Jorge Luiz Silva Nunes,&nbsp;Maurício Garcia de Camargo","doi":"10.1111/maec.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The relationships between meiofaunal communities and hard substrate are relatively well-documented in the scientific literature. However, a comprehensive quantitative review of global research on meiofauna colonization across different hard substrates has not yet been conducted. In this study, a scientometric analysis was performed to evaluate scientific interest in various hard substrates in studies exploring the influence of spatial heterogeneity on meiofaunal colonization. A total of 124 articles published from 1967 to 2023 were selected from online databases. Macroalgae were the most frequently studied hard substrate, and it was the one that harbors the highest abundance and richness values compared to other substrates. Studies predominantly focused on specific taxonomic groups, particularly Copepoda, Harpacticoida, and Ostracoda. Nematoda, Copepoda, Harpacticoida, and Amphipoda were the most commonly recorded meiofaunal taxa. Geographically, the United States of America was the most productive country in this field, followed by Brazil. Multivariate analyses, especially Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling (nMDS), were the primary quantitative methods used. A decline in studies on meiofauna-substrate relationships over recent years was observed. Given the extensive research on macroalgal colonization, future studies should consider a wider variety of hard substrates to expand understanding in this field.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49883,"journal":{"name":"Marine Ecology-An Evolutionary Perspective","volume":"46 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Ecology-An Evolutionary Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maec.70010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationships between meiofaunal communities and hard substrate are relatively well-documented in the scientific literature. However, a comprehensive quantitative review of global research on meiofauna colonization across different hard substrates has not yet been conducted. In this study, a scientometric analysis was performed to evaluate scientific interest in various hard substrates in studies exploring the influence of spatial heterogeneity on meiofaunal colonization. A total of 124 articles published from 1967 to 2023 were selected from online databases. Macroalgae were the most frequently studied hard substrate, and it was the one that harbors the highest abundance and richness values compared to other substrates. Studies predominantly focused on specific taxonomic groups, particularly Copepoda, Harpacticoida, and Ostracoda. Nematoda, Copepoda, Harpacticoida, and Amphipoda were the most commonly recorded meiofaunal taxa. Geographically, the United States of America was the most productive country in this field, followed by Brazil. Multivariate analyses, especially Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling (nMDS), were the primary quantitative methods used. A decline in studies on meiofauna-substrate relationships over recent years was observed. Given the extensive research on macroalgal colonization, future studies should consider a wider variety of hard substrates to expand understanding in this field.

微生物在硬基质上定殖的研究趋势
在科学文献中,小动物群落与硬基质之间的关系已经有了较好的记录。然而,目前还没有对全球范围内关于微型动物在不同硬基质上定殖的研究进行全面的定量回顾。在本研究中,采用科学计量学分析来评估各种硬基质在探索空间异质性对小动物定植影响的研究中的科学兴趣。从在线数据库中选择了1967年至2023年发表的124篇文章。大型藻类是研究最频繁的硬底物,与其他底物相比,它具有最高的丰度和丰富度值。研究主要集中在特定的分类类群上,特别是桡足类、羽足类和介形虫类。线虫类、桡足类、长足类和片足类是最常见的小动物类群。从地理上看,美利坚合众国是这一领域产量最高的国家,其次是巴西。多变量分析,特别是非度量多维尺度(nMDS)是主要的定量方法。近年来,对减数动物与基质关系的研究有所减少。鉴于对巨藻定殖的广泛研究,未来的研究应考虑更广泛的硬底物,以扩大对这一领域的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine Ecology-An Evolutionary Perspective
Marine Ecology-An Evolutionary Perspective 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Marine Ecology publishes original contributions on the structure and dynamics of marine benthic and pelagic ecosystems, communities and populations, and on the critical links between ecology and the evolution of marine organisms. The journal prioritizes contributions elucidating fundamental aspects of species interaction and adaptation to the environment through integration of information from various organizational levels (molecules to ecosystems) and different disciplines (molecular biology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, marine biology, natural history, geography, oceanography, palaeontology and modelling) as viewed from an ecological perspective. The journal also focuses on population genetic processes, evolution of life histories, morphological traits and behaviour, historical ecology and biogeography, macro-ecology and seascape ecology, palaeo-ecological reconstruction, and ecological changes due to introduction of new biota, human pressure or environmental change. Most applied marine science, including fisheries biology, aquaculture, natural-products chemistry, toxicology, and local pollution studies lie outside the scope of the journal. Papers should address ecological questions that would be of interest to a worldwide readership of ecologists; papers of mostly local interest, including descriptions of flora and fauna, taxonomic descriptions, and range extensions will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信