Seismic performance assessment of RC buildings under Turkey ground motions designed by Force Based Design and improved performance based plastic design method

Q2 Engineering
Rohit Vyas, Bush Rc, Abdullah Ansari, Kaushik Gondaliya, Anoop I. Shirkol
{"title":"Seismic performance assessment of RC buildings under Turkey ground motions designed by Force Based Design and improved performance based plastic design method","authors":"Rohit Vyas,&nbsp;Bush Rc,&nbsp;Abdullah Ansari,&nbsp;Kaushik Gondaliya,&nbsp;Anoop I. Shirkol","doi":"10.1007/s42107-024-01255-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Performance-Based Plastic Design (PBPD) is a widely used method for improving the seismic performance of structures by allowing controlled nonlinear behavior. The method is based on energy balance principles and a predefined target drift. However, its reliance on lateral load calculations often results in reduced strength of structural members, particularly in low- to medium-rise buildings where beam sections frequently fail to meet safe design requirements. This limitation raises concerns about the safety and reliability of PBPD-designed structures. To address this issue, an improved PBPD method is proposed by incorporating the minimum reinforcement criteria for beams as specified in the Indian design code. A 10-story reinforced concrete special moment-resisting frame was designed using the improved PBPD method and compared with a frame designed using the conventional force-based design approach. Nonlinear Pushover Analysis and Nonlinear Time History Analysis under strong Turkish ground motions were performed to evaluate the seismic performance of both designs. The results indicate that the improved PBPD method significantly enhances the seismic performance of the structure. The maximum considered earthquake level performance point of the PBPD frame lies within the Collapse Prevention range, while its overall drift ratio is 19.82% lower than that of the Force Based Design (FBD) frame. Incremental Dynamic Analysis further shows that only one ground motion exceeded the target drift of 0.02 for the improved PBPD frame. Additionally, fragility analysis demonstrates that the probability of complete failure is reduced to 17.2% for the PBPD frame, indicating superior robustness and reliability compared to the FBD frame.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 3","pages":"1355 - 1371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01255-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Performance-Based Plastic Design (PBPD) is a widely used method for improving the seismic performance of structures by allowing controlled nonlinear behavior. The method is based on energy balance principles and a predefined target drift. However, its reliance on lateral load calculations often results in reduced strength of structural members, particularly in low- to medium-rise buildings where beam sections frequently fail to meet safe design requirements. This limitation raises concerns about the safety and reliability of PBPD-designed structures. To address this issue, an improved PBPD method is proposed by incorporating the minimum reinforcement criteria for beams as specified in the Indian design code. A 10-story reinforced concrete special moment-resisting frame was designed using the improved PBPD method and compared with a frame designed using the conventional force-based design approach. Nonlinear Pushover Analysis and Nonlinear Time History Analysis under strong Turkish ground motions were performed to evaluate the seismic performance of both designs. The results indicate that the improved PBPD method significantly enhances the seismic performance of the structure. The maximum considered earthquake level performance point of the PBPD frame lies within the Collapse Prevention range, while its overall drift ratio is 19.82% lower than that of the Force Based Design (FBD) frame. Incremental Dynamic Analysis further shows that only one ground motion exceeded the target drift of 0.02 for the improved PBPD frame. Additionally, fragility analysis demonstrates that the probability of complete failure is reduced to 17.2% for the PBPD frame, indicating superior robustness and reliability compared to the FBD frame.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信