Farmer-centric On-Farm Experimentation: digital tools for a scalable transformative pathway

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Myrtille Lacoste, Véronique Bellon-Maurel, Isabelle Piot-Lepetit, Simon Cook, Nicolas Tremblay, Louis Longchamps, Matthew McNee, James Taylor, Julie Ingram, Ivan Adolwa, Andrew Hall
{"title":"Farmer-centric On-Farm Experimentation: digital tools for a scalable transformative pathway","authors":"Myrtille Lacoste,&nbsp;Véronique Bellon-Maurel,&nbsp;Isabelle Piot-Lepetit,&nbsp;Simon Cook,&nbsp;Nicolas Tremblay,&nbsp;Louis Longchamps,&nbsp;Matthew McNee,&nbsp;James Taylor,&nbsp;Julie Ingram,&nbsp;Ivan Adolwa,&nbsp;Andrew Hall","doi":"10.1007/s13593-025-01011-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This virtual issue reports on the use of digital technologies in On-Farm Experimentation (OFE) in varied farming systems across the world. The authors investigated diverse questions across contrasted environments and scientific domains, with methodologies that included review, empirical studies, interviews, and reflexive accounts. The contributions thus showcase the multiplicity of research directions that are relevant to OFE. This includes addressing the two intertwined types of research objects in OFE: the farmers’ questions (how to improve management) and the methodologies required to address these (how to improve research through OFE)—with the notable support of digital tools. The issue includes a systematic review exploring OFE practices and farmer-researcher relationships as reported in the scientific literature; a meta-analysis comparing experimental scales in the USA; reflexive analyzes on a feed assessment tool and a tree crop decision support system rooted in OFE that are connecting farmers and researchers in Africa; a retrospective on a large CGIAR program combining citizen sciences and OFE; the use of video recordings and work analysis to characterize farmers’ knowledge in French vineyards; and in the same sector in Australia, two accounts of the use of digital tools in spatially explicit OFE: one an investigation into farmers’ and consultants’ perceptions, the other a retrospective on the roles of precision agriculture. Findings from these examples validate the use of varied digital tools to scale the design, implementation, and learning stages of OFE processes. These include how to better harness and bridge the knowledge of farmers, researchers and other parties, examples of data management and analytics, the improved interpretation of results, and capitalizing on experiences. The international conference this issue was part of also led to acknowledgement of a lack of policy linkages, required to scale OFE endeavors by incentivizing institutional change toward more farmer-centric research practices and responsible digital deployment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-025-01011-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-025-01011-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This virtual issue reports on the use of digital technologies in On-Farm Experimentation (OFE) in varied farming systems across the world. The authors investigated diverse questions across contrasted environments and scientific domains, with methodologies that included review, empirical studies, interviews, and reflexive accounts. The contributions thus showcase the multiplicity of research directions that are relevant to OFE. This includes addressing the two intertwined types of research objects in OFE: the farmers’ questions (how to improve management) and the methodologies required to address these (how to improve research through OFE)—with the notable support of digital tools. The issue includes a systematic review exploring OFE practices and farmer-researcher relationships as reported in the scientific literature; a meta-analysis comparing experimental scales in the USA; reflexive analyzes on a feed assessment tool and a tree crop decision support system rooted in OFE that are connecting farmers and researchers in Africa; a retrospective on a large CGIAR program combining citizen sciences and OFE; the use of video recordings and work analysis to characterize farmers’ knowledge in French vineyards; and in the same sector in Australia, two accounts of the use of digital tools in spatially explicit OFE: one an investigation into farmers’ and consultants’ perceptions, the other a retrospective on the roles of precision agriculture. Findings from these examples validate the use of varied digital tools to scale the design, implementation, and learning stages of OFE processes. These include how to better harness and bridge the knowledge of farmers, researchers and other parties, examples of data management and analytics, the improved interpretation of results, and capitalizing on experiences. The international conference this issue was part of also led to acknowledgement of a lack of policy linkages, required to scale OFE endeavors by incentivizing institutional change toward more farmer-centric research practices and responsible digital deployment.

以农民为中心的农场实验:可扩展变革途径的数字工具
本期虚拟专题报道了数字技术在世界各地不同农业系统的农场实验(OFE)中的应用。作者在不同的环境和科学领域调查了不同的问题,方法包括回顾、实证研究、访谈和反思账户。因此,这些贡献展示了与OFE相关的研究方向的多样性。这包括解决OFE中两种相互交织的研究对象:农民的问题(如何改进管理)和解决这些问题所需的方法(如何通过OFE改进研究)——在数字工具的显著支持下。该问题包括对科学文献中报道的OFE实践和农民与研究人员关系进行系统回顾;比较美国实验量表的荟萃分析;对连接非洲农民和研究人员的饲料评估工具和基于OFE的林木作物决策支持系统的反射性分析;回顾CGIAR结合公民科学和科技创新的大型项目;使用录像和工作分析来描述法国葡萄园农民的知识;在澳大利亚的同一部门,有两份关于在空间明确的OFE中使用数字工具的报告:一份是对农民和顾问看法的调查,另一份是对精准农业角色的回顾。这些例子的结果验证了使用各种数字工具来扩展OFE流程的设计、实施和学习阶段。其中包括如何更好地利用和连接农民、研究人员和其他各方的知识,数据管理和分析的例子,改进对结果的解释,以及利用经验。这个问题是国际会议的一部分,也导致承认缺乏政策联系,需要通过激励制度变革向更多以农民为中心的研究实践和负责任的数字部署来扩大OFE的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信