Association between the Duke Activity Status Index and complications after noncardiac surgery: A systematic review

IF 5 2区医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111808

Earlene Silvapulle , Jai Darvall , Anurika De Silva

{"title":"Association between the Duke Activity Status Index and complications after noncardiac surgery: A systematic review","authors":"Earlene Silvapulle , Jai Darvall , Anurika De Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Individuals with poor functional capacity are at increased risk of perioperative complications. The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) can ascertain the maximum physical activity achievable. However, the accuracy of the DASI score in identifying high-risk individuals is unclear. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the association between the DASI score and postoperative complications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Studies conducted in adults undergoing elective or emergency noncardiac surgery were eligible. The search strategy used MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCARE and Cochrane CENTRAL, from January 1st, 1988 to August 8th, 2024. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated independently by two assessors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 5989 citations, nine studies (3100 participants) were included. The DASI score was associated with postoperative mortality (two studies, 732 participants) and postoperative cardiovascular complications (two studies, 2055 participants). The DASI score provided fair prediction of postoperative complications (three studies, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve range 0.71 to 0.75). Marked study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This systematic review found an association between low DASI scores and cardiovascular complications, postoperative complications and mortality, and variable association between DASI scores and hospital length of stay. The major limitation to the evidence was the significant heterogeneity of study population, outcome definitions, DASI thresholds and cardiovascular endpoints.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Amongst adults undergoing noncardiac surgery, the DASI score is associated with postoperative complications, cardiovascular complications and mortality. Further research is required to identify a DASI threshold (or confirm the DASI threshold of 34) that accurately predicts postoperative complications, including major cardiac events.</div></div><div><h3>Other</h3><div>This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO on March 4th, 2024 (CRD42024331864). No funding was obtained for this review.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 111808"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025000686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Individuals with poor functional capacity are at increased risk of perioperative complications. The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) can ascertain the maximum physical activity achievable. However, the accuracy of the DASI score in identifying high-risk individuals is unclear. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the association between the DASI score and postoperative complications.

Methods

Studies conducted in adults undergoing elective or emergency noncardiac surgery were eligible. The search strategy used MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCARE and Cochrane CENTRAL, from January 1st, 1988 to August 8th, 2024. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated independently by two assessors.

Results

Of 5989 citations, nine studies (3100 participants) were included. The DASI score was associated with postoperative mortality (two studies, 732 participants) and postoperative cardiovascular complications (two studies, 2055 participants). The DASI score provided fair prediction of postoperative complications (three studies, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve range 0.71 to 0.75). Marked study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis.

Discussion

This systematic review found an association between low DASI scores and cardiovascular complications, postoperative complications and mortality, and variable association between DASI scores and hospital length of stay. The major limitation to the evidence was the significant heterogeneity of study population, outcome definitions, DASI thresholds and cardiovascular endpoints.

Conclusion

Amongst adults undergoing noncardiac surgery, the DASI score is associated with postoperative complications, cardiovascular complications and mortality. Further research is required to identify a DASI threshold (or confirm the DASI threshold of 34) that accurately predicts postoperative complications, including major cardiac events.

Other

This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO on March 4th, 2024 (CRD42024331864). No funding was obtained for this review.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学

CiteScore

7.40

自引率

4.50%

发文量

346

审稿时长

23 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.