The association between education, practice, post-professional training and physical therapists’ attitudes and beliefs regarding low back pain management: A cross sectional survey study

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Sarah Case-Morris , Tzu-Chieh Liao , Olivia Simon , Daniel Whibley , Jennifer Blackwood , Danielle McCoy , Lindsey Fox
{"title":"The association between education, practice, post-professional training and physical therapists’ attitudes and beliefs regarding low back pain management: A cross sectional survey study","authors":"Sarah Case-Morris ,&nbsp;Tzu-Chieh Liao ,&nbsp;Olivia Simon ,&nbsp;Daniel Whibley ,&nbsp;Jennifer Blackwood ,&nbsp;Danielle McCoy ,&nbsp;Lindsey Fox","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Several recent initiatives have aimed to align physical therapists’ (PTs) understanding and management of low back pain (LBP) with the biopsychosocial model of health and illness.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to determine whether entry-level education, practice setting, experience, or post-professional training is associated with attitudes and beliefs of United States (US) PTs about LBP management, despite these initiatives.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to a sample of US PTs that included the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS-PT) and the Health Care Providers Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS). Linear regression was used to quantify the association between education, experience, post-professional training, and practice setting with PTs attitudes and beliefs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 412 respondents, those with a Bachelor's/Master's scored significantly higher on the PABS-Bio (β = 2.5, 95 % CI = 0.76–4.3, p = 0.005) and HC-PAIRS (β = 2.7, 95 % CI = 0.7–4.6, p = 0.006) and lower on the PABS-Psy (β = 1.7, 95 % CI = −2.7–0.7, p &lt; 0.001) compared to those with a DPT/tDPT. Those who did not undertake post-professional training scored higher on the PABS-Bio (β = 3.7, 95 % CI = 1.4–6.1, p = 0.002) and HC-PAIRS (β = 3.9, 95 % CI = 1.2–6.6, p = 0.005). Therapists licensed 20+ years and working in settings besides outpatient had stronger biomedical beliefs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Highest degree, post-professional training, years licensed, and practice setting were all significantly associated with attitudes and beliefs of practicing PTs in the US regarding LBP management. This study highlights the need for further investigation into education for improving PTs’ attitudes and beliefs around LBP amidst diverse practice settings and experience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 103312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781225000608","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Several recent initiatives have aimed to align physical therapists’ (PTs) understanding and management of low back pain (LBP) with the biopsychosocial model of health and illness.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine whether entry-level education, practice setting, experience, or post-professional training is associated with attitudes and beliefs of United States (US) PTs about LBP management, despite these initiatives.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to a sample of US PTs that included the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS-PT) and the Health Care Providers Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS). Linear regression was used to quantify the association between education, experience, post-professional training, and practice setting with PTs attitudes and beliefs.

Results

Of 412 respondents, those with a Bachelor's/Master's scored significantly higher on the PABS-Bio (β = 2.5, 95 % CI = 0.76–4.3, p = 0.005) and HC-PAIRS (β = 2.7, 95 % CI = 0.7–4.6, p = 0.006) and lower on the PABS-Psy (β = 1.7, 95 % CI = −2.7–0.7, p < 0.001) compared to those with a DPT/tDPT. Those who did not undertake post-professional training scored higher on the PABS-Bio (β = 3.7, 95 % CI = 1.4–6.1, p = 0.002) and HC-PAIRS (β = 3.9, 95 % CI = 1.2–6.6, p = 0.005). Therapists licensed 20+ years and working in settings besides outpatient had stronger biomedical beliefs.

Conclusion

Highest degree, post-professional training, years licensed, and practice setting were all significantly associated with attitudes and beliefs of practicing PTs in the US regarding LBP management. This study highlights the need for further investigation into education for improving PTs’ attitudes and beliefs around LBP amidst diverse practice settings and experience.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信