Multi-task benchmarking of spatially resolved gene expression simulation models

IF 10.1 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Xiaoqi Liang, Marni Torkel, Yue Cao, Jean Yee Hwa Yang
{"title":"Multi-task benchmarking of spatially resolved gene expression simulation models","authors":"Xiaoqi Liang, Marni Torkel, Yue Cao, Jean Yee Hwa Yang","doi":"10.1186/s13059-025-03505-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computational methods for spatially resolved transcriptomics (SRT) are often developed and assessed using simulated data. The effectiveness of these evaluations relies on the ability of simulation methods to accurately reflect experimental data. However, a systematic evaluation framework for spatial simulators is currently lacking. Here, we present SpatialSimBench, a comprehensive evaluation framework that assesses 13 simulation methods using ten distinct STR datasets. We introduce simAdaptor, a tool that extends single-cell simulators by incorporating spatial variables, enabling them to simulate spatial data. SimAdaptor ensures SpatialSimBench is backwards compatible, facilitating direct comparisons between spatially aware simulators and existing non-spatial single-cell simulators through the adaption. Using SpatialSimBench, we demonstrate the feasibility of leveraging existing single-cell simulators for SRT data and highlight performance differences among methods. Additionally, we evaluate the simulation methods based on a total of 35 metrics across data property estimation, various downstream analyses, and scalability. In total, we generated 4550 results from 13 simulation methods, ten spatial datasets, and 35 metrics. Our findings reveal that model estimation can be influenced by distribution assumptions and dataset characteristics. In summary, our evaluation framework provides guidelines for selecting appropriate methods for specific scenarios and informs future method development.\n","PeriodicalId":12611,"journal":{"name":"Genome Biology","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-025-03505-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computational methods for spatially resolved transcriptomics (SRT) are often developed and assessed using simulated data. The effectiveness of these evaluations relies on the ability of simulation methods to accurately reflect experimental data. However, a systematic evaluation framework for spatial simulators is currently lacking. Here, we present SpatialSimBench, a comprehensive evaluation framework that assesses 13 simulation methods using ten distinct STR datasets. We introduce simAdaptor, a tool that extends single-cell simulators by incorporating spatial variables, enabling them to simulate spatial data. SimAdaptor ensures SpatialSimBench is backwards compatible, facilitating direct comparisons between spatially aware simulators and existing non-spatial single-cell simulators through the adaption. Using SpatialSimBench, we demonstrate the feasibility of leveraging existing single-cell simulators for SRT data and highlight performance differences among methods. Additionally, we evaluate the simulation methods based on a total of 35 metrics across data property estimation, various downstream analyses, and scalability. In total, we generated 4550 results from 13 simulation methods, ten spatial datasets, and 35 metrics. Our findings reveal that model estimation can be influenced by distribution assumptions and dataset characteristics. In summary, our evaluation framework provides guidelines for selecting appropriate methods for specific scenarios and informs future method development.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genome Biology
Genome Biology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
241
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Genome Biology stands as a premier platform for exceptional research across all domains of biology and biomedicine, explored through a genomic and post-genomic lens. With an impressive impact factor of 12.3 (2022),* the journal secures its position as the 3rd-ranked research journal in the Genetics and Heredity category and the 2nd-ranked research journal in the Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology category by Thomson Reuters. Notably, Genome Biology holds the distinction of being the highest-ranked open-access journal in this category. Our dedicated team of highly trained in-house Editors collaborates closely with our esteemed Editorial Board of international experts, ensuring the journal remains on the forefront of scientific advances and community standards. Regular engagement with researchers at conferences and institute visits underscores our commitment to staying abreast of the latest developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信