Cooled radiofrequency ablation provides extended clinical utility in the management of chronic sacroiliac joint pain: 12-month follow-up results from the observational phase of a randomized, multicenter, comparative-effectiveness crossover study.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Steven Paul Cohen, Leonardo Kapural, Lynn Kohan, Sean Li, Robert Hurley, Richard Vallejo, Yashar Eshraghi, Pradeep Dinakar, Shravani Durbhakula, Douglas P Beall, Mehul J Desai, David Reece, Sandy Christiansen, Min Ho Chang, Adam J Carinci, Michael DePalma
{"title":"Cooled radiofrequency ablation provides extended clinical utility in the management of chronic sacroiliac joint pain: 12-month follow-up results from the observational phase of a randomized, multicenter, comparative-effectiveness crossover study.","authors":"Steven Paul Cohen, Leonardo Kapural, Lynn Kohan, Sean Li, Robert Hurley, Richard Vallejo, Yashar Eshraghi, Pradeep Dinakar, Shravani Durbhakula, Douglas P Beall, Mehul J Desai, David Reece, Sandy Christiansen, Min Ho Chang, Adam J Carinci, Michael DePalma","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-106315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain comprises up to 30% of cases of mechanical low back pain (LBP), the leading cause of disability worldwide. Despite sacral lateral branch cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) showing efficacy in clinical trials, there is a lack of comparative-effectiveness long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, multicenter, comparative-effectiveness study, 210 patients with injection-confirmed SIJ pain who responded to prognostic lateral branch blocks were randomly assigned to receive CRFA of the L5 dorsal ramus and S1-S3/4 lateral branches or standard medical management (SMM) consisting of pharmacotherapy, physical therapy, injections, and integrative therapies. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, with participants reporting unsatisfactory SMM outcomes being allowed to crossover (XO) and receive CRFA at 3 months. The primary outcome measure was the mean change in average LBP score on a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), with secondary outcomes including measures of quality of life (QoL) and function. A responder was defined as a participant who experienced a ≥30% or ≥2-point decrease in average daily NRS pain score coupled with a score ≥5 out of 7 (moderately better) on the Patient Global Impression of Change scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 months, the mean NRS pain score declined from a baseline of 6.4±1.4 to 3.5±2.6, with 57.4% (35/61) of participants in the randomized CRFA cohort experiencing a ≥2-point or 30% decrease in average LBP from baseline. In the crossover cohort, 35/63 (55.6%) subjects had the same experience 12 months following the XO procedure; in the XO group, the mean LBP decreased from 6.1±1.5 to 3.4±2.5. Patients also experienced clinically meaningful improvements in QoL via EuroQoL-5D-5L at 12 months (mean change of +0.22±0.27 in the originally-treated CRFA group and +0.21±0.33 in the XO group). Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores also improved by 12.4%±14.7 (CRFA) and 13.7%±17.1 (XO) from baseline at study-end. No serious adverse events related to the CRFA procedure were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRFA in patients with SIJ pain provided clinically significant and sustained improvements for 12 months following a single CRFA treatment, regardless of previous SMM treatment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03601949.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106315","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain comprises up to 30% of cases of mechanical low back pain (LBP), the leading cause of disability worldwide. Despite sacral lateral branch cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) showing efficacy in clinical trials, there is a lack of comparative-effectiveness long-term follow-up.

Methods: In this randomized, multicenter, comparative-effectiveness study, 210 patients with injection-confirmed SIJ pain who responded to prognostic lateral branch blocks were randomly assigned to receive CRFA of the L5 dorsal ramus and S1-S3/4 lateral branches or standard medical management (SMM) consisting of pharmacotherapy, physical therapy, injections, and integrative therapies. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, with participants reporting unsatisfactory SMM outcomes being allowed to crossover (XO) and receive CRFA at 3 months. The primary outcome measure was the mean change in average LBP score on a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), with secondary outcomes including measures of quality of life (QoL) and function. A responder was defined as a participant who experienced a ≥30% or ≥2-point decrease in average daily NRS pain score coupled with a score ≥5 out of 7 (moderately better) on the Patient Global Impression of Change scale.

Results: At 12 months, the mean NRS pain score declined from a baseline of 6.4±1.4 to 3.5±2.6, with 57.4% (35/61) of participants in the randomized CRFA cohort experiencing a ≥2-point or 30% decrease in average LBP from baseline. In the crossover cohort, 35/63 (55.6%) subjects had the same experience 12 months following the XO procedure; in the XO group, the mean LBP decreased from 6.1±1.5 to 3.4±2.5. Patients also experienced clinically meaningful improvements in QoL via EuroQoL-5D-5L at 12 months (mean change of +0.22±0.27 in the originally-treated CRFA group and +0.21±0.33 in the XO group). Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores also improved by 12.4%±14.7 (CRFA) and 13.7%±17.1 (XO) from baseline at study-end. No serious adverse events related to the CRFA procedure were reported.

Conclusion: CRFA in patients with SIJ pain provided clinically significant and sustained improvements for 12 months following a single CRFA treatment, regardless of previous SMM treatment.

Trial registration number: NCT03601949.

冷却射频消融为慢性骶髂关节疼痛的治疗提供了广泛的临床应用:一项随机、多中心、比较有效性交叉研究的观察期12个月随访结果。
骶髂关节(SIJ)疼痛占机械性腰痛(LBP)病例的30%,是全球致残的主要原因。尽管骶骨外侧分支冷却射频消融(CRFA)在临床试验中显示出疗效,但缺乏相对有效的长期随访。方法:在这项随机、多中心、比较疗效的研究中,210名对预后侧支阻滞有反应的注射证实的SIJ疼痛患者被随机分配接受L5背支和S1-S3/4侧支的CRFA或标准医疗管理(SMM),包括药物治疗、物理治疗、注射和综合治疗。患者在1、3、6、9和12个月随访,报告SMM结果不满意的参与者被允许交叉(XO)并在3个月时接受CRFA。主要结果测量是0-10数值评定量表(NRS)上LBP平均得分的平均变化,次要结果包括生活质量(QoL)和功能的测量。应答者被定义为每日平均NRS疼痛评分下降≥30%或≥2分,并且患者总体变化印象量表得分≥5分(总分7分)的参与者。结果:在12个月时,平均NRS疼痛评分从基线的6.4±1.4下降到3.5±2.6,随机CRFA队列中有57.4%(35/61)的参与者平均LBP比基线下降≥2点或30%。在交叉队列中,35/63(55.6%)受试者在XO手术后12个月有相同的经历;XO组平均LBP由6.1±1.5降至3.4±2.5。通过EuroQoL-5D-5L,患者在12个月时的生活质量也有临床意义的改善(最初治疗的CRFA组的平均变化为+0.22±0.27,XO组的平均变化为+0.21±0.33)。研究结束时,Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评分也较基线提高了12.4%±14.7 (CRFA)和13.7%±17.1 (XO)。无与CRFA相关的严重不良事件报告。结论:与之前的SMM治疗无关,单次CRFA治疗后,SIJ疼痛患者的CRFA在12个月内提供了显著的临床持续改善。试验注册号:NCT03601949。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信