Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologics: Current Practice, Challenges and Opportunities - a Workshop Report.

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sophie Shubow, Michele Gunsior, Amy Rosenberg, Yow-Ming Wang, Tara Altepeter, Daphne Guinn, Mohsen Rajabiabhari, Joseph Kotarek, Diane R Mould, Honghui Zhou, Adam S Cheifetz, Sandra Garces, Rachel Chevalier, Sean Gavan, Mark R Trusheim, Theo Rispens, Kurtis Bray, Michael A Partridge
{"title":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologics: Current Practice, Challenges and Opportunities - a Workshop Report.","authors":"Sophie Shubow, Michele Gunsior, Amy Rosenberg, Yow-Ming Wang, Tara Altepeter, Daphne Guinn, Mohsen Rajabiabhari, Joseph Kotarek, Diane R Mould, Honghui Zhou, Adam S Cheifetz, Sandra Garces, Rachel Chevalier, Sean Gavan, Mark R Trusheim, Theo Rispens, Kurtis Bray, Michael A Partridge","doi":"10.1208/s12248-025-01050-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for dose modification of biologics has the potential to improve patient outcomes. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) hosted the first US-based public workshop on TDM of biologics with contributions from a broad array of interested parties including healthcare providers, clinical pharmacologists, test developers, bioanalysis and immunogenicity scientists, health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) experts and regulators. The key insight was that despite a body of evidence to support TDM in certain therapeutic areas, there remain substantial challenges to widespread clinical implementation. There is a lack of consensus regarding the integration of TDM in clinical guidelines, and a lack of consensus on the cost-effectiveness of TDM; both factors contribute to the difficulty that healthcare providers face in obtaining reimbursement for TDM (both coverage of testing itself, and coverage of potential dosing modifications). The HEOR experts outlined alternative routes to obtaining reimbursement and suggested advocating for changes in coverage policies to promote TDM use in the clinic. Reaching alignment across policy makers, patients and advocacy groups, payers, and healthcare providers, on specific treatment settings where TDM will be clearly beneficial, was identified as an important step to advancing TDM implementation for the benefit of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":"27 2","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-025-01050-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for dose modification of biologics has the potential to improve patient outcomes. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) hosted the first US-based public workshop on TDM of biologics with contributions from a broad array of interested parties including healthcare providers, clinical pharmacologists, test developers, bioanalysis and immunogenicity scientists, health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) experts and regulators. The key insight was that despite a body of evidence to support TDM in certain therapeutic areas, there remain substantial challenges to widespread clinical implementation. There is a lack of consensus regarding the integration of TDM in clinical guidelines, and a lack of consensus on the cost-effectiveness of TDM; both factors contribute to the difficulty that healthcare providers face in obtaining reimbursement for TDM (both coverage of testing itself, and coverage of potential dosing modifications). The HEOR experts outlined alternative routes to obtaining reimbursement and suggested advocating for changes in coverage policies to promote TDM use in the clinic. Reaching alignment across policy makers, patients and advocacy groups, payers, and healthcare providers, on specific treatment settings where TDM will be clearly beneficial, was identified as an important step to advancing TDM implementation for the benefit of patients.

生物制剂治疗药物监测:当前实践,挑战和机遇-研讨会报告。
生物制剂剂量调整的治疗药物监测(TDM)具有改善患者预后的潜力。美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)和美国制药科学家协会(AAPS)主办了第一次美国生物制剂TDM公共研讨会,来自广泛的利益相关方的贡献,包括医疗保健提供者、临床药理学家、测试开发人员、生物分析和免疫原性科学家、卫生经济学和结果研究(HEOR)专家和监管机构。关键的观点是,尽管有大量证据支持TDM在某些治疗领域的应用,但在广泛的临床应用方面仍存在重大挑战。关于TDM在临床指南中的整合,以及TDM的成本效益缺乏共识;这两个因素都导致医疗保健提供者在获得TDM的报销方面面临困难(包括测试本身的覆盖范围,以及潜在的剂量调整的覆盖范围)。HEOR专家概述了获得报销的替代途径,并建议倡导改变保险政策,以促进TDM在诊所的使用。政策制定者、患者和倡导团体、支付方和医疗保健提供者就TDM明显有益的特定治疗设置达成一致,被认为是推进TDM实施以造福患者的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信