Does Inspiratory Threshold Loading and Visual Tasking Affect Visual Attention Accuracy?

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Steven Schan, Yasma Ali-Hassan, Brielle Loebach, Aarushi Bahl, Emily O'Quinn, Manjiri Kulkarni, Marine Van Hollebeke, Peter Rassam, Tamires Mori, Dmitry Rozenberg, W Darlene Reid
{"title":"Does Inspiratory Threshold Loading and Visual Tasking Affect Visual Attention Accuracy?","authors":"Steven Schan, Yasma Ali-Hassan, Brielle Loebach, Aarushi Bahl, Emily O'Quinn, Manjiri Kulkarni, Marine Van Hollebeke, Peter Rassam, Tamires Mori, Dmitry Rozenberg, W Darlene Reid","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzaf031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dyspnea is commonly experienced in adults who are young and have different health conditions (asthma, obesity, panic disorders) and may impede not only physical exertion but also cognitive function such as visual attention. To test this, visual attention was evaluated using the Multiple Object Tracking Test (MOT) alone and combined with low or moderate inspiratory threshold loading (ITL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a pretest-posttest design, we evaluated 25 participants who were healthy and 19 to 31 years old. Visual attention accuracy was quantified using the MOT, wherein participants tracked moving disks on a computer monitor. Participants performed 5 single or dual tasks in random order: MOT; low ITL of 20 cm H2O (ITL20); moderate ITL of 40 cm H2O (ITL40); dual task: MOT plus ITL20 (MOT + ITL20); and dual task: MOT plus ITL40 (MOT + ITL40). Dyspnea intensity measured with the Borg Dyspnea Scale and emotional response measured with the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) were evaluated at baseline and for single and dual tasks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to single task MOT, dual tasks induced lower MOT scores with moderate loads (MOT + ITL40) resulting in lower scores than dual task low ITL (MOT + ITL20). Exertional dyspnea intensity and SAM affective measures increased during ITL and dual tasks compared to baseline. Moreover, higher dual task MOT scores were related to greater inspiratory muscle strength and to more positive affect evaluated by SAM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals experiencing inspiratory muscle loading and associated dyspnea demonstrated decreased visual attention accuracy, which was accentuated by higher inspiratory loads, lower respiratory muscle strength, and higher emotional response.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Although physical activity is often prescribed according to the musculoskeletal or cardiovascular stress, the cognitive interference of how dyspnea compromises cognitive function should be considered. The inability to attend to visual detail during added respiratory loads with associated dyspnea should be considered during assessment and treatment planning. A physical-cognitive approach to prescription of physical function may ensure more transferability to daily activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Dyspnea is commonly experienced in adults who are young and have different health conditions (asthma, obesity, panic disorders) and may impede not only physical exertion but also cognitive function such as visual attention. To test this, visual attention was evaluated using the Multiple Object Tracking Test (MOT) alone and combined with low or moderate inspiratory threshold loading (ITL).

Methods: Using a pretest-posttest design, we evaluated 25 participants who were healthy and 19 to 31 years old. Visual attention accuracy was quantified using the MOT, wherein participants tracked moving disks on a computer monitor. Participants performed 5 single or dual tasks in random order: MOT; low ITL of 20 cm H2O (ITL20); moderate ITL of 40 cm H2O (ITL40); dual task: MOT plus ITL20 (MOT + ITL20); and dual task: MOT plus ITL40 (MOT + ITL40). Dyspnea intensity measured with the Borg Dyspnea Scale and emotional response measured with the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) were evaluated at baseline and for single and dual tasks.

Results: Compared to single task MOT, dual tasks induced lower MOT scores with moderate loads (MOT + ITL40) resulting in lower scores than dual task low ITL (MOT + ITL20). Exertional dyspnea intensity and SAM affective measures increased during ITL and dual tasks compared to baseline. Moreover, higher dual task MOT scores were related to greater inspiratory muscle strength and to more positive affect evaluated by SAM.

Conclusions: Individuals experiencing inspiratory muscle loading and associated dyspnea demonstrated decreased visual attention accuracy, which was accentuated by higher inspiratory loads, lower respiratory muscle strength, and higher emotional response.

Impact: Although physical activity is often prescribed according to the musculoskeletal or cardiovascular stress, the cognitive interference of how dyspnea compromises cognitive function should be considered. The inability to attend to visual detail during added respiratory loads with associated dyspnea should be considered during assessment and treatment planning. A physical-cognitive approach to prescription of physical function may ensure more transferability to daily activities.

吸气阈值负荷和视觉任务是否影响视觉注意准确性?
目的:呼吸困难常见于有不同健康状况(哮喘、肥胖、惊恐障碍)的年轻成年人,不仅会妨碍体力消耗,还会妨碍视觉注意力等认知功能。为了验证这一点,我们使用单独的多目标跟踪测试(MOT)并结合低或中等吸气阈值负荷(ITL)来评估视觉注意。方法:采用前测后测设计,对25名19 ~ 31岁的健康受试者进行评估。视觉注意准确性通过MOT被量化,参与者在电脑显示器上跟踪移动的磁盘。参与者按随机顺序完成5项单任务或双任务:MOT;低ITL20 cm H2O (ITL20);40 cm H2O的中等升容(ITL40);双重任务:MOT + ITL20 (MOT + ITL20);和双重任务:MOT + ITL40 (MOT + ITL40)。用Borg呼吸困难量表测量呼吸困难强度,用自我评估模型(SAM)测量情绪反应,在基线和单任务和双任务中进行评估。结果:与单任务MOT相比,中等负荷(MOT + ITL40)的双任务MOT得分较低,且低于双任务低负荷(MOT + ITL20)。与基线相比,在ITL和双重任务期间,运动呼吸困难强度和SAM情感测量增加。此外,较高的双任务MOT得分与更大的吸气肌力量和SAM评估的更积极的影响有关。结论:经历吸气肌负荷和相关呼吸困难的个体表现出视觉注意准确性下降,而高吸气负荷、低呼吸肌力量和高情绪反应加剧了这种下降。影响:虽然身体活动通常是根据肌肉骨骼或心血管压力来规定的,但应该考虑呼吸困难如何损害认知功能的认知干扰。在评估和治疗计划时,应考虑到在增加呼吸负荷并伴有呼吸困难时无法注意到视觉细节。身体认知方法处方的身体功能可以确保更多的转移到日常活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信