Clinical Assessment of Walking Capacity in People With Parkinson Disease: Are 2 Minutes Sufficient?

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Hanna Johansson, Linda Rennie, Wilhelmus J A Grooten, Breiffni Leavy
{"title":"Clinical Assessment of Walking Capacity in People With Parkinson Disease: Are 2 Minutes Sufficient?","authors":"Hanna Johansson, Linda Rennie, Wilhelmus J A Grooten, Breiffni Leavy","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzaf034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Walking capacity progressively declines in people with Parkinson disease (PD), and assessment of walking is imperative for monitoring disease progression and evaluating intervention efficacy. The main aim of this study was to explore whether the 2-minute walk test (2MWT) could be substituted for the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) as a measure of walking capacity in people with PD. We also sought to investigate construct and known-groups validity of the 2MWT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis based on data from the Supported Home Training in Everyday Life for Parkinson Disease trial was conducted in a hospital setting. Sixty-three people with idiopathic, mild to moderate PD (29 women; mean age = 69.2 years) were included. Spatiotemporal gait parameters during the 2MWT and the 6MWT were captured by wearable sensors. Linear regression was used to analyze the association between distances walked, whereas paired-samples t tests and repeated-measures analysis of variance were used to explore mean differences in gait parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Distance walked over the 2MWT was very strongly associated with the 6MWT. Gait speed was higher during the shorter test, and several speed-related parameters significantly differed between the tests. There was a trend over the 6MWT, whereby participants performed better during the last 2 minutes of the test. Analyses revealed convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity of the 2MWT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that the 2MWT adequately captures walking capacity among people with mild to moderate PD and demonstrates robust convergent validity and ability to discriminate between people at different levels of disease severity.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The 2MWT is a sufficient and valid alternative for physical therapists who wish to assess walking capacity in people with mild to moderate PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12074571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Walking capacity progressively declines in people with Parkinson disease (PD), and assessment of walking is imperative for monitoring disease progression and evaluating intervention efficacy. The main aim of this study was to explore whether the 2-minute walk test (2MWT) could be substituted for the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) as a measure of walking capacity in people with PD. We also sought to investigate construct and known-groups validity of the 2MWT.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis based on data from the Supported Home Training in Everyday Life for Parkinson Disease trial was conducted in a hospital setting. Sixty-three people with idiopathic, mild to moderate PD (29 women; mean age = 69.2 years) were included. Spatiotemporal gait parameters during the 2MWT and the 6MWT were captured by wearable sensors. Linear regression was used to analyze the association between distances walked, whereas paired-samples t tests and repeated-measures analysis of variance were used to explore mean differences in gait parameters.

Results: Distance walked over the 2MWT was very strongly associated with the 6MWT. Gait speed was higher during the shorter test, and several speed-related parameters significantly differed between the tests. There was a trend over the 6MWT, whereby participants performed better during the last 2 minutes of the test. Analyses revealed convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity of the 2MWT.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that the 2MWT adequately captures walking capacity among people with mild to moderate PD and demonstrates robust convergent validity and ability to discriminate between people at different levels of disease severity.

Impact: The 2MWT is a sufficient and valid alternative for physical therapists who wish to assess walking capacity in people with mild to moderate PD.

帕金森病患者步行能力的临床评估:两分钟足够吗?
目的:帕金森病(PD)患者的行走能力逐渐下降,评估行走能力对于监测疾病进展和评估干预效果是必要的。本研究的主要目的是探讨2分钟步行测试(2MWT)是否可以取代6分钟步行测试(6MWT)作为PD患者步行能力的衡量标准。我们还试图调查2MWT的结构效度和已知组效度。方法:在医院环境下进行基于日常生活支持家庭训练帕金森病试验数据的横断面分析。63例特发性轻至中度PD患者(女性29例;平均年龄= 69.2岁)。通过可穿戴传感器采集2、6MWT时的步态时空参数。使用线性回归分析行走距离之间的相关性,而使用成对样本t检验和重复测量方差分析来探索步态参数的平均差异。结果:走过2MWT的距离与走过6MWT的距离密切相关。在较短的测试中,步态速度更高,并且几个与速度相关的参数在测试之间显着不同。在6MWT中有一个趋势,即参与者在测试的最后2分钟表现更好。分析显示了2MWT的收敛效度、判别效度和已知组效度。结论:这些研究结果表明,2MWT能充分反映轻度至中度PD患者的行走能力,并显示出强大的收敛效度和区分不同疾病严重程度人群的能力。影响:对于希望评估轻度至中度PD患者行走能力的物理治疗师来说,2MWT是一个充分和有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信