Proximal Ulna Angular Measurements in Elbow Dislocations: Radiographic Insights into Simple vs. Complex Injuries.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Cafer Ozgur Hancerli, Gürkan Caliskan, Halil Buyukdogan, Abdulhamit Misir
{"title":"Proximal Ulna Angular Measurements in Elbow Dislocations: Radiographic Insights into Simple vs. Complex Injuries.","authors":"Cafer Ozgur Hancerli, Gürkan Caliskan, Halil Buyukdogan, Abdulhamit Misir","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elbow dislocations are common injuries, classified as simple or complex based on the presence of fractures. While the stabilizing structures of the elbow have been well-studied, the influence of proximal ulna anatomical variations on the risk and severity of dislocations remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate Proximal Ulna Dorsal Angulation (PUDA), Proximal Ulnar Varus Angle (PUVA), and Olecranodiaphyseal Angle (ODA) in healthy individuals, patients with simple elbow dislocations, and those with complex elbow dislocations. We hypothesized significant differences in these angles between the groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted including healthy controls (n=182), patients with simple elbow dislocations (n=112), and patients with complex elbow dislocations (n=52). Standardized anteroposterior and lateral elbow radiographs were obtained to measure PUDA, PUVA, and ODA. Radiographic measurements were conducted by two independent observers to ensure reliability. The study aimed to determine anatomical differences that could influence the likelihood and severity of elbow dislocations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ODA was significantly lower in patients with complex elbow dislocations compared to both healthy controls and those with simple dislocations. Patients with radial head fractures had significantly lower ODA values than those without fractures. PUDA showed small differences between right and left elbows, but these differences had limited clinical relevance. Lower ODA was independently associated with the development of radial head fractures, indicating its potential as a factor of injury severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ODA serves as a significant anatomical marker that can differentiate between simple and complex elbow dislocations and is associated with fracture risk, particularly in complex dislocations. These findings suggest that assessing ODA may aid in evaluating elbow stability and planning treatment strategies for dislocation injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Elbow dislocations are common injuries, classified as simple or complex based on the presence of fractures. While the stabilizing structures of the elbow have been well-studied, the influence of proximal ulna anatomical variations on the risk and severity of dislocations remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate Proximal Ulna Dorsal Angulation (PUDA), Proximal Ulnar Varus Angle (PUVA), and Olecranodiaphyseal Angle (ODA) in healthy individuals, patients with simple elbow dislocations, and those with complex elbow dislocations. We hypothesized significant differences in these angles between the groups.

Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted including healthy controls (n=182), patients with simple elbow dislocations (n=112), and patients with complex elbow dislocations (n=52). Standardized anteroposterior and lateral elbow radiographs were obtained to measure PUDA, PUVA, and ODA. Radiographic measurements were conducted by two independent observers to ensure reliability. The study aimed to determine anatomical differences that could influence the likelihood and severity of elbow dislocations.

Results: ODA was significantly lower in patients with complex elbow dislocations compared to both healthy controls and those with simple dislocations. Patients with radial head fractures had significantly lower ODA values than those without fractures. PUDA showed small differences between right and left elbows, but these differences had limited clinical relevance. Lower ODA was independently associated with the development of radial head fractures, indicating its potential as a factor of injury severity.

Conclusion: ODA serves as a significant anatomical marker that can differentiate between simple and complex elbow dislocations and is associated with fracture risk, particularly in complex dislocations. These findings suggest that assessing ODA may aid in evaluating elbow stability and planning treatment strategies for dislocation injuries.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信