Evidence-based Practice: Updating Contingency Paper Documentation.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Bonnie Crumley Aybar, Nicole Maheu
{"title":"Evidence-based Practice: Updating Contingency Paper Documentation.","authors":"Bonnie Crumley Aybar, Nicole Maheu","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Contingency Paper Documentation (CPD) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) was outdated and did not include all required documentation. Crucial assessment, education, and readiness for discharge were not.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The design of this project and literature review was based on the Problem-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome question-How can CPD be improved to include all required PACU assessments, education, and discharge criteria?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Review and rating of literature for evidence was specific to nursing documentation and paper documentation. Staff provided input to update the PACU CPD document. Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were implemented to create the final document.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There was a lack of information specific to updating the CPD. Themes identified with the literature review include the flow of documentation should mimic nursing care provided, the process, and the Electronic Health Care Record; to include user input in improvement initiatives; include evidence-based recommendations/regulations; consider quality and include outcomes in documentation; avoid abbreviations, and to use standardized language.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PACU CPD was updated with staff input and evidence from the literature review, and with trialing the document for formatting and content. The updated form is quicker and easier to use, with less content written in free text. Future quality assessment of the new document is planned to include quality of documentation, legibility, and meeting organizational documentation requirements, as compared with the previous CPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.11.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Contingency Paper Documentation (CPD) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) was outdated and did not include all required documentation. Crucial assessment, education, and readiness for discharge were not.

Design: The design of this project and literature review was based on the Problem-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome question-How can CPD be improved to include all required PACU assessments, education, and discharge criteria?

Methods: Review and rating of literature for evidence was specific to nursing documentation and paper documentation. Staff provided input to update the PACU CPD document. Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were implemented to create the final document.

Findings: There was a lack of information specific to updating the CPD. Themes identified with the literature review include the flow of documentation should mimic nursing care provided, the process, and the Electronic Health Care Record; to include user input in improvement initiatives; include evidence-based recommendations/regulations; consider quality and include outcomes in documentation; avoid abbreviations, and to use standardized language.

Conclusions: The PACU CPD was updated with staff input and evidence from the literature review, and with trialing the document for formatting and content. The updated form is quicker and easier to use, with less content written in free text. Future quality assessment of the new document is planned to include quality of documentation, legibility, and meeting organizational documentation requirements, as compared with the previous CPD.

基于证据的实践:更新应急文件文档。
目的:麻醉后护理单位(PACU)的应急纸质文件(CPD)已经过时,没有包括所有必需的文件。关键的评估、教育和出院准备都没有。设计:该项目的设计和文献综述基于问题-干预-比较-结果问题-如何改进CPD以包括所有要求的PACU评估、教育和出院标准?方法:对护理文献和纸质文献进行文献回顾和评价。工作人员为更新PACU CPD文件提供了输入。通过多个计划-执行-研究-行动循环来创建最终文件。研究结果:缺乏更新CPD的具体信息。与文献综述确定的主题包括文件流程应模仿所提供的护理、流程和电子医疗记录;在改善措施中纳入用户的意见;包括基于证据的建议/法规;考虑质量并在文档中包含结果;避免缩写,并使用标准化的语言。结论:PACU CPD根据工作人员的输入和文献综述的证据进行了更新,并对文件的格式和内容进行了试用。更新后的表单更快捷、更容易使用,自由文本形式的内容更少。与以前的CPD相比,计划对新文件进行未来的质量评估,包括文件质量、易读性和满足组织文件要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信