The oral health care needs of people living in residential aged care, Australia, 2016–20: a retrospective cross-sectional study

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Gillian E Caughey, Tracy Air, Miia Rahja, Maria C Inacio
{"title":"The oral health care needs of people living in residential aged care, Australia, 2016–20: a retrospective cross-sectional study","authors":"Gillian E Caughey,&nbsp;Tracy Air,&nbsp;Miia Rahja,&nbsp;Maria C Inacio","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Providing high quality medical care for people living in residential aged care is a national challenge, and oral health care is one area that is inadequate.<span><sup>1</sup></span> In 2014, 84.7% of residents in Victorian nursing homes had untreated dental decay;<span><sup>2</sup></span> in 2015, 53% of Australians aged 65 years or older had periodontal disease and 19% complete tooth loss.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Poor oral health is associated with other adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, cognitive decline, and pneumonia.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety recommended that the access of aged care home residents to oral health practitioners be improved.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Apart from establishing the national Senior Dental Benefits Scheme and adding dental and oral health care to the Quality of Care Principles, evidence of effective action has, however, been limited.<span><sup>5</sup></span></p><p>We therefore estimated the incidence of oral and dental-related care needs and health service and medication use for aged care residents, analysing data for the national historical cohort of the Registry of Senior Australians (ROSA),<span><sup>6</sup></span> 1 July 2016 – 30 June 2020. We included all 360 305 non-Indigenous residents of aged care homes aged 65 years or older who did not hold Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) concession cards (access to Medicare Benefits Schedule [MBS] items is different for DVA card holders). Oral health information for 137 113 residents was based on the aged care eligibility assessments that have been conducted by the aged care eligibility assessment team since 1 July 2017. The assessment includes a mandatory question about problems with teeth, mouth, or dentures, including tooth loss, dental cavities, periodontal disease, and gingivitis (inflammation of the gums, dry mouth, tooth wear). We estimated crude and direct age- and sex-standardised (reference year: 2017–18 ROSA study cohort) cumulative incidence of hospitalisations with oral health or dental-related diagnoses as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), dental practitioner health service use (MBS data), and the dispensing of medications prescribed by public and private dentists (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme Dental Schedule data), both overall and by financial year (Supporting Information, table 1). Hospitalisation analyses were limited by the availability of ROSA historical cohort data to aged care residents admitted to public hospitals in South Australia, New South Wales, and Victoria (private hospitals data are not available for South Australia). The study was approved by the University of South Australia human research ethics committee (200489), the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare ethics committee (EO2022/4/1376), the South Australian Department for Health and Wellbeing human research ethics committee (HREC/18/SAH/90), and the New South Wales Population and Health Services research ethics committee (2019/ETH12028).</p><p>The median age of the 360 305 eligible residents in 2830 residential aged care homes was 85 years (interquartile range [IQR], 80–90 years); 226 490 were women (62.9%), 192 310 were living with dementia (53.4%), and they had a median five (IQR, 3–7) health conditions. Median study follow-up time for residents was 499 days (IQR, 188–1002 days). Oral health care problems were identified for 26 842 of 137 113 people (19.6%; 95% CI, 19.4–19.8%). Of all eligible residents, 665 people (0.18%; 95% CI, 0.17–0.20%) had used MBS-subsidised dental practitioner health services, and 6605 (1.83%; 95% CI, 1.79–1.88%) had used medications prescribed by dentists (Box). A total of 4954 aged care residents in South Australia, New South Wales, and Victoria (1.99%; 95% CI, 1.94–2.05%) had been hospitalised with dental or oral-related diagnoses (Supporting Information, table 3); 1167 hospitalisations (0.47% of residents; 95% CI, 0.44–0.50% were potentially preventable (Box).</p><p>Our findings, based on a population-based evaluation, can be generalised to all aged care home residents in Australia. However, we could not include dental services provided through the residential aged care home or paid for privately (ie, services that were not MBS-subsidised); data for private dental care in aged care homes is required to assess whether dental and oral health care needs are being met. In March 2024, 54.9% of older Australians had private health insurance,<span><sup>7</sup></span> which can include subsidisation of private dental services.</p><p>Despite recent government initiatives to improve the oral health of older Australians, including the <i>National Oral Health Plan 2015–2024</i>,<span><sup>8</sup></span> current models of care and service delivery in residential aged care are not meeting the needs of residents. The system, service, and workforce barriers to improving oral health include high staff turnover and the lack of oral health education for staff, the high costs and access problems of dental and oral health services, and the inadequate integration of aged care and health care systems.<span><sup>9, 10</sup></span> Encouragingly, the publicly funded dental domiciliary service program of the Sydney Local Health District, the Inner West Oral Health Outreach Program (Reach-OHT), has shown that a multidisciplinary team providing oral health assessments and treatments (largely diagnostic and preventive services) is a feasible and sustainable approach to oral health care for aged care residents.<span><sup>11</sup></span> Oral health policy and practice reforms are urgently needed to improve the health and wellbeing of older Australians living in aged care homes.</p><p>Open access publishing facilitated by Flinders University, as part of the Wiley – Flinders University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.</p><p>No relevant disclosures.</p><p>The data underlying this report are not available for sharing because of restrictions imposed by the ethics and original data custodian approval.</p>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"222 6","pages":"318-320"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52625","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52625","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Providing high quality medical care for people living in residential aged care is a national challenge, and oral health care is one area that is inadequate.1 In 2014, 84.7% of residents in Victorian nursing homes had untreated dental decay;2 in 2015, 53% of Australians aged 65 years or older had periodontal disease and 19% complete tooth loss.3 Poor oral health is associated with other adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, cognitive decline, and pneumonia.4 The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety recommended that the access of aged care home residents to oral health practitioners be improved.1 Apart from establishing the national Senior Dental Benefits Scheme and adding dental and oral health care to the Quality of Care Principles, evidence of effective action has, however, been limited.5

We therefore estimated the incidence of oral and dental-related care needs and health service and medication use for aged care residents, analysing data for the national historical cohort of the Registry of Senior Australians (ROSA),6 1 July 2016 – 30 June 2020. We included all 360 305 non-Indigenous residents of aged care homes aged 65 years or older who did not hold Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) concession cards (access to Medicare Benefits Schedule [MBS] items is different for DVA card holders). Oral health information for 137 113 residents was based on the aged care eligibility assessments that have been conducted by the aged care eligibility assessment team since 1 July 2017. The assessment includes a mandatory question about problems with teeth, mouth, or dentures, including tooth loss, dental cavities, periodontal disease, and gingivitis (inflammation of the gums, dry mouth, tooth wear). We estimated crude and direct age- and sex-standardised (reference year: 2017–18 ROSA study cohort) cumulative incidence of hospitalisations with oral health or dental-related diagnoses as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), dental practitioner health service use (MBS data), and the dispensing of medications prescribed by public and private dentists (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme Dental Schedule data), both overall and by financial year (Supporting Information, table 1). Hospitalisation analyses were limited by the availability of ROSA historical cohort data to aged care residents admitted to public hospitals in South Australia, New South Wales, and Victoria (private hospitals data are not available for South Australia). The study was approved by the University of South Australia human research ethics committee (200489), the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare ethics committee (EO2022/4/1376), the South Australian Department for Health and Wellbeing human research ethics committee (HREC/18/SAH/90), and the New South Wales Population and Health Services research ethics committee (2019/ETH12028).

The median age of the 360 305 eligible residents in 2830 residential aged care homes was 85 years (interquartile range [IQR], 80–90 years); 226 490 were women (62.9%), 192 310 were living with dementia (53.4%), and they had a median five (IQR, 3–7) health conditions. Median study follow-up time for residents was 499 days (IQR, 188–1002 days). Oral health care problems were identified for 26 842 of 137 113 people (19.6%; 95% CI, 19.4–19.8%). Of all eligible residents, 665 people (0.18%; 95% CI, 0.17–0.20%) had used MBS-subsidised dental practitioner health services, and 6605 (1.83%; 95% CI, 1.79–1.88%) had used medications prescribed by dentists (Box). A total of 4954 aged care residents in South Australia, New South Wales, and Victoria (1.99%; 95% CI, 1.94–2.05%) had been hospitalised with dental or oral-related diagnoses (Supporting Information, table 3); 1167 hospitalisations (0.47% of residents; 95% CI, 0.44–0.50% were potentially preventable (Box).

Our findings, based on a population-based evaluation, can be generalised to all aged care home residents in Australia. However, we could not include dental services provided through the residential aged care home or paid for privately (ie, services that were not MBS-subsidised); data for private dental care in aged care homes is required to assess whether dental and oral health care needs are being met. In March 2024, 54.9% of older Australians had private health insurance,7 which can include subsidisation of private dental services.

Despite recent government initiatives to improve the oral health of older Australians, including the National Oral Health Plan 2015–2024,8 current models of care and service delivery in residential aged care are not meeting the needs of residents. The system, service, and workforce barriers to improving oral health include high staff turnover and the lack of oral health education for staff, the high costs and access problems of dental and oral health services, and the inadequate integration of aged care and health care systems.9, 10 Encouragingly, the publicly funded dental domiciliary service program of the Sydney Local Health District, the Inner West Oral Health Outreach Program (Reach-OHT), has shown that a multidisciplinary team providing oral health assessments and treatments (largely diagnostic and preventive services) is a feasible and sustainable approach to oral health care for aged care residents.11 Oral health policy and practice reforms are urgently needed to improve the health and wellbeing of older Australians living in aged care homes.

Open access publishing facilitated by Flinders University, as part of the Wiley – Flinders University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.

No relevant disclosures.

The data underlying this report are not available for sharing because of restrictions imposed by the ethics and original data custodian approval.

2016-20 年澳大利亚寄宿养老院居民的口腔保健需求:一项回顾性横断面研究》(The oral health care needs of people living in residential aged care, Australia, 2016-20: a retrospective crosssectional study)。
为居住在养老院的人提供高质量的医疗服务是一个全国性的挑战,而口腔保健是一个不足的领域2014年,84.7%的维多利亚州养老院居民患有未经治疗的蛀牙;2015年,53%的65岁及以上的澳大利亚人患有牙周病,19%的人牙齿完全脱落口腔健康状况不佳与其他不良健康结果相关,包括心血管疾病、认知能力下降和肺炎老年护理质量和安全皇家委员会建议,老年护理之家的居民获得口腔健康从业人员的机会应该得到改善除了建立国家老年牙科福利计划和将牙科和口腔保健纳入护理质量原则之外,有效行动的证据有限。5因此,我们通过分析2016年7月1日至2020年6月30日澳大利亚老年人登记处(ROSA)的国家历史队列数据,估计了老年护理居民口腔和牙科相关护理需求、卫生服务和药物使用的发生率。我们纳入了所有360305名年龄在65岁或以上的老年护理院非土著居民,他们没有持有退伍军人事务部(DVA)优惠卡(DVA卡持有人获得医疗保险福利计划[MBS]项目的机会不同)。137113名居民的口腔健康信息基于老年护理资格评估小组自2017年7月1日起进行的老年护理资格评估。评估包括一个关于牙齿、口腔或假牙问题的强制性问题,包括牙齿脱落、蛀牙、牙周病和牙龈炎(牙龈炎症、口干、牙齿磨损)。我们估计粗糙和直接的年龄和性别标准化(参考年份:口腔健康或牙科相关诊断的累计住院发生率(95%置信区间(ci)的比例),牙科医生健康服务使用(MBS数据),以及公立和私立牙医处方药物的分配(药物福利计划牙科计划数据),总体和按财政年度(支持信息,表1)住院分析受限于南澳大利亚州、新南威尔士州和维多利亚州公立医院住院的老年护理居民的ROSA历史队列数据的可用性(南澳大利亚州没有私立医院的数据)。本研究已获得南澳大利亚大学人类研究伦理委员会(200489)、澳大利亚卫生与福利研究所伦理委员会(EO2022/4/1376)、南澳大利亚卫生与福祉部人类研究伦理委员会(HREC/18/SAH/90)和新南威尔士州人口与卫生服务研究伦理委员会(2019/ETH12028)的批准。2830家安老院360305名合资格居民的年龄中位数为85岁(四分位数间距[IQR], 80-90岁);226 490人是女性(62.9%),192 310人患有痴呆症(53.4%),他们的健康状况中位数为5 (IQR, 3-7)。居民的中位研究随访时间为499天(IQR, 188-1002天)。137113人中有26842人存在口腔保健问题(19.6%;95% ci, 19.4-19.8%)。在所有符合条件的居民中,665人(0.18%;95% CI, 0.17-0.20%)曾使用mbs资助的牙科医生保健服务,6605人(1.83%;95% CI, 1.79-1.88%)曾使用牙医开具的药物(方框)。南澳大利亚州、新南威尔士州和维多利亚州共4954名老年护理居民(1.99%;95% CI, 1.94-2.05%)曾因牙科或口腔相关诊断住院(支持信息,表3);住院1167例(占居民的0.47%);95% CI, 0.44-0.50%是潜在可预防的(Box)。我们的研究结果基于基于人群的评估,可以推广到澳大利亚所有养老院的居民。然而,我们不包括由安老院舍提供或私人支付的牙科服务(即不获按揭贷款支持计划资助的服务);为了评估牙科和口腔保健需求是否得到满足,需要提供老年护理院私人牙科护理的数据。截至2024年3月,54.9%的澳大利亚老年人拥有私人医疗保险7,其中包括对私人牙科服务的补贴。尽管政府最近采取了改善澳大利亚老年人口腔健康的举措,包括《2015-2024年全国口腔健康计划》,但目前养老院的护理和服务提供模式并不能满足居民的需求。改善口腔健康的制度、服务和劳动力障碍包括工作人员高流动率和对工作人员缺乏口腔健康教育,牙科和口腔卫生服务的高成本和获取问题,以及老年保健和卫生保健系统的整合不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信