Survival and Clinical Outcomes After Single-vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Drug-eluting Stent: An Observational and Follow-up Study in a Tertiary Care Center in the Gangetic Plains of North India.

Q3 Medicine
Soumik Ghosh, Rajpal Prajapati, Arjun Tandon, Amit K Gauraw, Kumar Amit, Om Shankar
{"title":"Survival and Clinical Outcomes After Single-vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Drug-eluting Stent: An Observational and Follow-up Study in a Tertiary Care Center in the Gangetic Plains of North India.","authors":"Soumik Ghosh, Rajpal Prajapati, Arjun Tandon, Amit K Gauraw, Kumar Amit, Om Shankar","doi":"10.59556/japi.73.0869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) has transformed the management of coronary artery disease (CAD), particularly for single-vessel disease (SVD), by reducing restenosis rates. However, long-term survival data following PCI in North Indian populations are limited. This study aimed to evaluate survival and clinical outcomes after PCI with DES and identify factors associated with mortality and adverse events, such as chest pain, dyspnea, and bleeding.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This observational cohort study at Sir Sunder Lal Hospital, Banaras Hindu University, included 1,112 adult patients undergoing single-vessel PCI with DES. Patients were followed for 18 months <i>via</i> outpatient assessments and telephonic interviews to assess survival, chest pain, dyspnea, and bleeding. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 25.0). Continuous variables were reported as mean ± SD, and categorical data as frequencies and percentages. Chi-square and independent <i>t</i>-tests were used, with a 5% significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 782 patients who were successfully followed up after 18 months, 740 (94.62%) were alive, and 42 (5.38%) had died. Significant factors associated with mortality included older age (<i>p</i> = 0.013), history of hospitalization (<i>p</i> < 0.001), chest pain (<i>p</i> < 0.001), dyspnea (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and bleeding (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was the leading cause of death (52.3%), followed by post-PCI complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCI with DES demonstrated a high survival rate in North Indian patients with SVD. Key predictors of mortality were age, history of hospitalization, and post-PCI symptoms, emphasizing the need for long-term follow-up and aggressive management of symptoms to improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","volume":"73 3","pages":"21-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.73.0869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) has transformed the management of coronary artery disease (CAD), particularly for single-vessel disease (SVD), by reducing restenosis rates. However, long-term survival data following PCI in North Indian populations are limited. This study aimed to evaluate survival and clinical outcomes after PCI with DES and identify factors associated with mortality and adverse events, such as chest pain, dyspnea, and bleeding.

Materials and methods: This observational cohort study at Sir Sunder Lal Hospital, Banaras Hindu University, included 1,112 adult patients undergoing single-vessel PCI with DES. Patients were followed for 18 months via outpatient assessments and telephonic interviews to assess survival, chest pain, dyspnea, and bleeding. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 25.0). Continuous variables were reported as mean ± SD, and categorical data as frequencies and percentages. Chi-square and independent t-tests were used, with a 5% significance level.

Results: Of the 782 patients who were successfully followed up after 18 months, 740 (94.62%) were alive, and 42 (5.38%) had died. Significant factors associated with mortality included older age (p = 0.013), history of hospitalization (p < 0.001), chest pain (p < 0.001), dyspnea (p < 0.001), and bleeding (p < 0.001). Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was the leading cause of death (52.3%), followed by post-PCI complications.

Conclusion: PCI with DES demonstrated a high survival rate in North Indian patients with SVD. Key predictors of mortality were age, history of hospitalization, and post-PCI symptoms, emphasizing the need for long-term follow-up and aggressive management of symptoms to improve outcomes.

使用药物洗脱支架进行单血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的生存率和临床结果:北印度恒河平原一家三级医疗中心的观察和随访研究》。
导读:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与药物洗脱支架(DES)已经改变了冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的管理,特别是对于单血管疾病(SVD),通过降低再狭窄率。然而,北印度人群PCI术后的长期生存数据有限。本研究旨在评估PCI合并DES后的生存和临床结果,并确定与死亡率和不良事件相关的因素,如胸痛、呼吸困难和出血。材料和方法:这项在巴纳拉斯印度大学Sir Sunder Lal医院进行的观察性队列研究纳入了1112名接受单血管PCI合并DES的成年患者。通过门诊评估和电话访谈对患者进行了18个月的随访,以评估生存率、胸痛、呼吸困难和出血情况。数据分析使用IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 25.0)。连续变量以均数±标准差报告,分类数据以频率和百分比报告。采用卡方检验和独立t检验,显著性水平为5%。结果:18个月后随访成功的782例患者中,存活740例(94.62%),死亡42例(5.38%)。与死亡率相关的重要因素包括年龄较大(p = 0.013)、住院史(p < 0.001)、胸痛(p < 0.001)、呼吸困难(p < 0.001)和出血(p < 0.001)。急性冠脉综合征(ACS)是主要死亡原因(52.3%),其次是pci术后并发症。结论:PCI联合DES治疗北印度地区SVD患者生存率高。死亡率的主要预测因素是年龄、住院史和pci后症状,强调需要长期随访和积极治疗症状以改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
509
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信