Effect of controlled hyperventilation on post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy shoulder pain: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Ji Li, Huatang Zhao, Chen Sheng, Yingchao Liu, Ruijing Zhan
{"title":"Effect of controlled hyperventilation on post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy shoulder pain: a prospective randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ji Li, Huatang Zhao, Chen Sheng, Yingchao Liu, Ruijing Zhan","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03666-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated whether intraoperative controlled hyperventilation could reduce the incidence and severity of post-laparoscopic shoulder pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial, 150 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to either controlled hyperventilation (n = 75) or conventional ventilation (n = 75) groups. The hyperventilation group received mechanical ventilation with a tidal volume of 10 mL/kg and respiratory rate adjusted to maintain end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> between 30 and 35 mmHg, while the control group received conventional ventilation (tidal volume 8 mL/kg, end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> 35-45 mmHg). The primary outcome was the incidence and severity of shoulder pain during the first 48 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative parameters, gas exchange values, surgical site pain, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hyperventilation group demonstrated significantly lower shoulder pain incidence (36.0% vs. 60.0%, P = 0.003), shorter pain duration (4.13 ± 6.25 vs. 9.24 ± 7.82 h, P < 0.001), and consistently lower pain intensity scores at all time points up to 48 h postoperatively. The intervention group also showed shorter operation time (50.01 ± 12.04 vs. 80.32 ± 34.23 min, P < 0.001), lower pneumoperitoneum pressure requirements (11.73 ± 1.19 vs. 33.72 ± 19.47 mmHg, P < 0.001), and improved patient satisfaction (73.33% vs. 42.67%, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications, time to first flatus, or length of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative controlled hyperventilation effectively reduces the incidence and severity of shoulder pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, while improving surgical conditions and patient satisfaction. This simple intervention provides a safe and cost-effective approach to enhancing postoperative outcomes in laparoscopic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03666-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated whether intraoperative controlled hyperventilation could reduce the incidence and severity of post-laparoscopic shoulder pain.

Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial, 150 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to either controlled hyperventilation (n = 75) or conventional ventilation (n = 75) groups. The hyperventilation group received mechanical ventilation with a tidal volume of 10 mL/kg and respiratory rate adjusted to maintain end-tidal CO2 between 30 and 35 mmHg, while the control group received conventional ventilation (tidal volume 8 mL/kg, end-tidal CO2 35-45 mmHg). The primary outcome was the incidence and severity of shoulder pain during the first 48 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative parameters, gas exchange values, surgical site pain, and patient satisfaction.

Results: The hyperventilation group demonstrated significantly lower shoulder pain incidence (36.0% vs. 60.0%, P = 0.003), shorter pain duration (4.13 ± 6.25 vs. 9.24 ± 7.82 h, P < 0.001), and consistently lower pain intensity scores at all time points up to 48 h postoperatively. The intervention group also showed shorter operation time (50.01 ± 12.04 vs. 80.32 ± 34.23 min, P < 0.001), lower pneumoperitoneum pressure requirements (11.73 ± 1.19 vs. 33.72 ± 19.47 mmHg, P < 0.001), and improved patient satisfaction (73.33% vs. 42.67%, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications, time to first flatus, or length of hospital stay.

Conclusion: Intraoperative controlled hyperventilation effectively reduces the incidence and severity of shoulder pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, while improving surgical conditions and patient satisfaction. This simple intervention provides a safe and cost-effective approach to enhancing postoperative outcomes in laparoscopic surgery.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信