Calcifying Epithelial Odontogenic Tumour (Pindborg Tumour): A Report of 20 Cases and Review of the Literature.

IF 3.2 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Lucas Fabian Polti, Romina Belén Gorrino-Baquero, Krissya María Villegas, Nathalie Amaya-Londoño, María Luisa Paparella
{"title":"Calcifying Epithelial Odontogenic Tumour (Pindborg Tumour): A Report of 20 Cases and Review of the Literature.","authors":"Lucas Fabian Polti, Romina Belén Gorrino-Baquero, Krissya María Villegas, Nathalie Amaya-Londoño, María Luisa Paparella","doi":"10.1007/s12105-024-01716-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the present work was to analyze 20 cases of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumour (CEOT), also known as \"Pindborg tumour\", and contrast the data with findings reported in the literature.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty cases of CEOT filed in the archives of the Surgical Pathology Laboratory of the Oral Pathology Department, School of Dentistry, University of Buenos Aires, over a period of 63 years (1960-2023) were retrieved. Their histopathological, histochemical-immunohistochemical, and clinical-radiographic features were evaluated, and the obtained data were compared with those reported in the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CEOT accounted for 1% of odontogenic tumours and 0.02% of oral pathologies filed over the study period. Seventeen cases (85%) were intraosseous lesions (solid: 14 cases; cystic: three cases). Three cases (15%) were extraosseous (solid: two cases; cystic: one case). One case, an intraosseous tumour, was malignant. Three cases (15%) showed clear cells (intraosseous location: two cases; extraosseous location: one case), and two cases (10%) (intraosseous) had fusiform cells. All cases showed amyloid deposits and calcifications. Mean age was 36 years (10-71 years). A female predominance was observed (12 cases, 60%), and the prevalent location was the mandible (14 cases, 70%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CEOT is infrequent and presents a wide range of morphological features, making diagnosis challenging. Two cases in our series, intraosseous tumours, showed spindle cell epithelial proliferation, and one extraosseous case was cystic. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47972,"journal":{"name":"Head & Neck Pathology","volume":"19 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Neck Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-024-01716-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the present work was to analyze 20 cases of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumour (CEOT), also known as "Pindborg tumour", and contrast the data with findings reported in the literature.

Materials and methods: Twenty cases of CEOT filed in the archives of the Surgical Pathology Laboratory of the Oral Pathology Department, School of Dentistry, University of Buenos Aires, over a period of 63 years (1960-2023) were retrieved. Their histopathological, histochemical-immunohistochemical, and clinical-radiographic features were evaluated, and the obtained data were compared with those reported in the literature.

Results: CEOT accounted for 1% of odontogenic tumours and 0.02% of oral pathologies filed over the study period. Seventeen cases (85%) were intraosseous lesions (solid: 14 cases; cystic: three cases). Three cases (15%) were extraosseous (solid: two cases; cystic: one case). One case, an intraosseous tumour, was malignant. Three cases (15%) showed clear cells (intraosseous location: two cases; extraosseous location: one case), and two cases (10%) (intraosseous) had fusiform cells. All cases showed amyloid deposits and calcifications. Mean age was 36 years (10-71 years). A female predominance was observed (12 cases, 60%), and the prevalent location was the mandible (14 cases, 70%).

Conclusions: CEOT is infrequent and presents a wide range of morphological features, making diagnosis challenging. Two cases in our series, intraosseous tumours, showed spindle cell epithelial proliferation, and one extraosseous case was cystic. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report these findings.

牙源性钙化上皮肿瘤(Pindborg肿瘤):附20例报告并文献复习。
目的:本研究的目的是分析20例钙化上皮性牙源性肿瘤(CEOT),也称为“Pindborg肿瘤”,并将数据与文献报道的结果进行对比。材料和方法:检索布宜诺斯艾利斯大学牙科学院口腔病理科外科病理实验室档案中63年间(1960-2023)的20例CEOT病例。评估其组织病理学、组织化学-免疫组织化学和临床-影像学特征,并将所获得的数据与文献报道的数据进行比较。结果:在研究期间,CEOT占牙源性肿瘤的1%,占口腔病理的0.02%。骨内病变17例(85%)(实性14例;囊性:3例)。骨外3例(15%)(实性2例;囊性:一例)。一例骨内肿瘤为恶性肿瘤。3例(15%)显示透明细胞(骨内2例;骨外位置:1例),2例(10%)(骨内)有梭状细胞。所有病例均有淀粉样蛋白沉积和钙化。平均年龄36岁(10 ~ 71岁)。以女性为主(12例,60%),主要发生在下颌骨(14例,70%)。结论:CEOT罕见且表现出广泛的形态学特征,使诊断具有挑战性。本系列病例中有2例骨内肿瘤显示梭形细胞上皮增生,1例骨外肿瘤呈囊性。据我们所知,这是首次报道这些发现的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Head & Neck Pathology presents scholarly papers, reviews and symposia that cover the spectrum of human surgical pathology within the anatomic zones of the oral cavity, sinonasal tract, larynx, hypopharynx, salivary gland, ear and temporal bone, and neck. The journal publishes rapid developments in new diagnostic criteria, intraoperative consultation, immunohistochemical studies, molecular techniques, genetic analyses, diagnostic aids, experimental pathology, cytology, radiographic imaging, and application of uniform terminology to allow practitioners to continue to maintain and expand their knowledge in the subspecialty of head and neck pathology. Coverage of practical application to daily clinical practice is supported with proceedings and symposia from international societies and academies devoted to this field. Single-blind peer review The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信