Reshma Gupta, Mayu Sasaki, Sandra L Taylor, Sili Fan, Jeffrey S Hoch, Yi Zhang, Matthew Crase, Dan Tancredi, Jason Y Adams, Hendry Ton
{"title":"Developing and Applying the BE-FAIR Equity Framework to a Population Health Predictive Model: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.","authors":"Reshma Gupta, Mayu Sasaki, Sandra L Taylor, Sili Fan, Jeffrey S Hoch, Yi Zhang, Matthew Crase, Dan Tancredi, Jason Y Adams, Hendry Ton","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09462-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Population health programs rely on healthcare predictive models to allocate resources, yet models can perpetuate biases that exacerbate health disparities among marginalized communities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We developed the Bias-reduction and Equity Framework for Assessing, Implementing, and Redesigning (BE-FAIR) healthcare predictive models, an applied framework tested within a large health system using a population health predictive model, aiming to minimize bias and enhance equity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic medical center. Data collected from September 30, 2020, to October 1, 2022, were analyzed to assess bias resulting from model use.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Primary care or payer-attributed patients at the medical center identified through electronic health records and claims data. Participants were stratified by race-ethnicity, gender, and social vulnerability defined by the Healthy Places Index (HPI).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>BE-FAIR implementation involved steps such as an anti-racism lens application, de-siloed team structure, historical intervention review, disaggregated data analysis, and calibration evaluation.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the calibration and discrimination of the model across different demographic groups, measured by logistic regression and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population consisted of 114,311 individuals with a mean age of 43.4 years (SD 24.0 years), 55.4% female, and 59.5% white/Caucasian. Calibration differed by race-ethnicity and HPI with significantly lower predicted probabilities of hospitalization for African Americans (0.129±0.051, p=0.016), Hispanics (0.133±0.047, p=0.004), AAPI (0.120±0.051, p=0.018), and multi-race (0.245±0.087, p=0.005) relative to white/Caucasians and for individuals in low HPI areas (0 - 25%, 0.178±0.042, p<0.001; 25 - 50%, 0.129±0.044, p=0.003). AUROC values varied among demographic groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BE-FAIR framework offers a practical approach to address bias in healthcare predictive models, guiding model development, and implementation. By identifying and mitigating biases, BE-FAIR enhances the fairness and equity of healthcare delivery, particularly for minoritized groups, paving the way for more inclusive and effective population health strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09462-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Population health programs rely on healthcare predictive models to allocate resources, yet models can perpetuate biases that exacerbate health disparities among marginalized communities.
Objective: We developed the Bias-reduction and Equity Framework for Assessing, Implementing, and Redesigning (BE-FAIR) healthcare predictive models, an applied framework tested within a large health system using a population health predictive model, aiming to minimize bias and enhance equity.
Design: Retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic medical center. Data collected from September 30, 2020, to October 1, 2022, were analyzed to assess bias resulting from model use.
Participants: Primary care or payer-attributed patients at the medical center identified through electronic health records and claims data. Participants were stratified by race-ethnicity, gender, and social vulnerability defined by the Healthy Places Index (HPI).
Intervention: BE-FAIR implementation involved steps such as an anti-racism lens application, de-siloed team structure, historical intervention review, disaggregated data analysis, and calibration evaluation.
Main measures: The primary outcome was the calibration and discrimination of the model across different demographic groups, measured by logistic regression and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
Results: The study population consisted of 114,311 individuals with a mean age of 43.4 years (SD 24.0 years), 55.4% female, and 59.5% white/Caucasian. Calibration differed by race-ethnicity and HPI with significantly lower predicted probabilities of hospitalization for African Americans (0.129±0.051, p=0.016), Hispanics (0.133±0.047, p=0.004), AAPI (0.120±0.051, p=0.018), and multi-race (0.245±0.087, p=0.005) relative to white/Caucasians and for individuals in low HPI areas (0 - 25%, 0.178±0.042, p<0.001; 25 - 50%, 0.129±0.044, p=0.003). AUROC values varied among demographic groups.
Conclusions: The BE-FAIR framework offers a practical approach to address bias in healthcare predictive models, guiding model development, and implementation. By identifying and mitigating biases, BE-FAIR enhances the fairness and equity of healthcare delivery, particularly for minoritized groups, paving the way for more inclusive and effective population health strategies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.