Chaitanya Kalavagunta, Bansi Savla, Jessica White, Dominic Bulkley, Anna Dunlap, Renee Kwok, Kennecia Shaw, Michael MacFarlane, Sara Dudley, David Alicia, Kimberly Marter, Rivka Leichter, Cameron Chason, Søren M Bentzen, William Regine, Melissa Vyfhuis
{"title":"Forward momentum: progressive change through diversity equity and inclusion initiatives in academic health care.","authors":"Chaitanya Kalavagunta, Bansi Savla, Jessica White, Dominic Bulkley, Anna Dunlap, Renee Kwok, Kennecia Shaw, Michael MacFarlane, Sara Dudley, David Alicia, Kimberly Marter, Rivka Leichter, Cameron Chason, Søren M Bentzen, William Regine, Melissa Vyfhuis","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluates the impact of a 2-year Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) intervention program within a radiation oncology department. We analyzed employee perceptions of inclusivity, bias, training, and career development, recognizing the challenges of assessing DEI initiatives in an evolving sociopolitical context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A voluntary survey was distributed in 2021 and 2023. The survey assessed 4 DEI domains: Inclusivity, Department Bias, Training/Education, and Career Development. Responses were analyzed using nonparametric tests. DEI initiatives included implicit bias training, allyship training, book clubs, anonymous feedback platforms, and a DEI website.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey completion rates were 40% (2021) and 50% (2023). Significant improvements were observed in Inclusivity (3.72 vs 3.91, P = .042), Training/Education (3.57 vs 4.14, P < .001), and Career Development (3.39 vs 3.60, P = .019). Department Bias showed no significant change (P = .130). Anti-DEI sentiment increased in 2023, highlighting challenges in fostering inclusivity. Subgroup analyses revealed improvements for Black employees but persistent disparities for women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This exploratory study suggests that targeted DEI initiatives can improve employee perceptions of workplace culture in academic health-care settings. Notably, the program improved perceptions of inclusivity, training opportunities, and career development. However, persistent gender inequities in training and career development highlight the need for monitoring and focused efforts. These findings can inform future DEI strategies and underscore the importance of continued vigilance in promoting an inclusive work environment. Future research should explore the program's downstream effects on patient care, clinical trial enrollment, and residency enrollment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11976714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study evaluates the impact of a 2-year Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) intervention program within a radiation oncology department. We analyzed employee perceptions of inclusivity, bias, training, and career development, recognizing the challenges of assessing DEI initiatives in an evolving sociopolitical context.
Methods: A voluntary survey was distributed in 2021 and 2023. The survey assessed 4 DEI domains: Inclusivity, Department Bias, Training/Education, and Career Development. Responses were analyzed using nonparametric tests. DEI initiatives included implicit bias training, allyship training, book clubs, anonymous feedback platforms, and a DEI website.
Results: Survey completion rates were 40% (2021) and 50% (2023). Significant improvements were observed in Inclusivity (3.72 vs 3.91, P = .042), Training/Education (3.57 vs 4.14, P < .001), and Career Development (3.39 vs 3.60, P = .019). Department Bias showed no significant change (P = .130). Anti-DEI sentiment increased in 2023, highlighting challenges in fostering inclusivity. Subgroup analyses revealed improvements for Black employees but persistent disparities for women.
Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that targeted DEI initiatives can improve employee perceptions of workplace culture in academic health-care settings. Notably, the program improved perceptions of inclusivity, training opportunities, and career development. However, persistent gender inequities in training and career development highlight the need for monitoring and focused efforts. These findings can inform future DEI strategies and underscore the importance of continued vigilance in promoting an inclusive work environment. Future research should explore the program's downstream effects on patient care, clinical trial enrollment, and residency enrollment.
目的:本研究评估放射肿瘤科为期两年的多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)干预计划的影响。我们分析了员工对包容性、偏见、培训和职业发展的看法,认识到在不断变化的社会政治背景下评估DEI举措的挑战。方法:在2021年和2023年进行自愿调查。该调查评估了四个DEI领域:包容性、部门偏见、培训/教育和职业发展。采用非参数检验对反应进行分析。DEI的举措包括内隐偏见培训、盟友培训、读书俱乐部、匿名反馈平台和DEI网站。结果:调查完成率分别为40%(2021)和50%(2023)。在包容性(3.72 vs. 3.91, p = 0.042)、培训/教育(3.57 vs. 4.14, p)方面观察到显著改善。结论:本探索性研究表明,有针对性的DEI举措可以改善学术医疗环境中员工对工作场所文化的看法。值得注意的是,该项目改善了人们对包容性、培训机会和职业发展的看法。然而,培训和职业发展方面持续存在的性别不平等突出了监测和集中努力的必要性。这些发现可以为未来的DEI战略提供信息,并强调在促进包容性工作环境方面继续保持警惕的重要性。未来的研究应探讨该计划对患者护理、临床试验登记和住院医师登记的下游影响。