Chaitanya Kalavagunta, Bansi Savla, Jessica White, Dominic Bulkley, Anna Dunlap, Renee Kwok, Kennecia Shaw, Michael MacFarlane, Sara Dudley, David Alicia, Kimberly Marter, Rivka Leichter, Cameron Chason, Søren M Bentzen, William Regine, Melissa Vyfhuis
{"title":"Forward momentum: Progressive change through diversity equity and inclusion initiatives (DEI) in academic healthcare.","authors":"Chaitanya Kalavagunta, Bansi Savla, Jessica White, Dominic Bulkley, Anna Dunlap, Renee Kwok, Kennecia Shaw, Michael MacFarlane, Sara Dudley, David Alicia, Kimberly Marter, Rivka Leichter, Cameron Chason, Søren M Bentzen, William Regine, Melissa Vyfhuis","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the impact of a two-year Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) intervention program within a radiation oncology department. We analyzed employee perceptions of inclusivity, bias, training, and career development, recognizing the challenges of assessing DEI initiatives in an evolving sociopolitical context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A voluntary survey was distributed in 2021 and 2023. The survey assessed four DEI domains: Inclusivity, Department Bias, Training/Education, and Career Development. Responses were analyzed using nonparametric tests. DEI initiatives included implicit bias training, allyship training, book clubs, anonymous feedback platforms, and a DEI website.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey completion rates were 40% (2021) and 50% (2023). Significant improvements were observed in Inclusivity (3.72 vs. 3.91, p = 0.042), Training/Education (3.57 vs. 4.14, p < 0.001), and Career Development (3.39 vs. 3.60, p = 0.019). Department Bias showed no significant change (p = 0.130). Anti-DEI sentiment increased in 2023, highlighting challenges in fostering inclusivity. Subgroup analyses revealed improvements for Black employees but persistent disparities for women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This exploratory study suggests that targeted DEI initiatives can improve employee perceptions of workplace culture in academic healthcare settings. Notably, the program improved perceptions of inclusivity, training opportunities, and career development. However, persistent gender inequities in training and career development highlight the need for monitoring and focused efforts. These findings can inform future DEI strategies and underscore the importance of continued vigilance in promoting an inclusive work environment. Future research should explore the program's downstream effects on patient care, clinical trial enrollment, and residency enrollment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluates the impact of a two-year Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) intervention program within a radiation oncology department. We analyzed employee perceptions of inclusivity, bias, training, and career development, recognizing the challenges of assessing DEI initiatives in an evolving sociopolitical context.
Methods: A voluntary survey was distributed in 2021 and 2023. The survey assessed four DEI domains: Inclusivity, Department Bias, Training/Education, and Career Development. Responses were analyzed using nonparametric tests. DEI initiatives included implicit bias training, allyship training, book clubs, anonymous feedback platforms, and a DEI website.
Results: Survey completion rates were 40% (2021) and 50% (2023). Significant improvements were observed in Inclusivity (3.72 vs. 3.91, p = 0.042), Training/Education (3.57 vs. 4.14, p < 0.001), and Career Development (3.39 vs. 3.60, p = 0.019). Department Bias showed no significant change (p = 0.130). Anti-DEI sentiment increased in 2023, highlighting challenges in fostering inclusivity. Subgroup analyses revealed improvements for Black employees but persistent disparities for women.
Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that targeted DEI initiatives can improve employee perceptions of workplace culture in academic healthcare settings. Notably, the program improved perceptions of inclusivity, training opportunities, and career development. However, persistent gender inequities in training and career development highlight the need for monitoring and focused efforts. These findings can inform future DEI strategies and underscore the importance of continued vigilance in promoting an inclusive work environment. Future research should explore the program's downstream effects on patient care, clinical trial enrollment, and residency enrollment.