MRI-Based Cervical VBQ Scores as Predictors of Cage Subsidence in Cervical Spine Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Song Wang, Hao Yang, Honglin Liao, Ping He, Xiang Zhang, Hao Liu, Bo Qu, Hongsheng Yang
{"title":"MRI-Based Cervical VBQ Scores as Predictors of Cage Subsidence in Cervical Spine Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Song Wang, Hao Yang, Honglin Liao, Ping He, Xiang Zhang, Hao Liu, Bo Qu, Hongsheng Yang","doi":"10.1177/21925682251327381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.ObjectivePoor bone quality is a major risk factor for complications after cervical spine surgery. The MRI-based cervical vertebral bone quality (C-VBQ) score is a reliable tool for assessing bone quality. This study systematically evaluates, for the first time, the predictive value of C-VBQ for cage subsidence risk in cervical spine surgery patients using meta-analysis.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of relevant literature in electronic databases up to October 16, 2024, to systematically assess the quality of included studies. Publication bias was evaluated by comparing C-VBQ between groups and calculating pooled sensitivity, specificity, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves.Results7 studies involving 681 patients were included. Using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool, the studies were deemed high quality with low risk of bias. High C-VBQ scores were significantly associated with fusion subsidence, with a pooled odds ratio of 2.98 (95% CI: 1.68-5.30). The C-VBQ cut-off value was 2.94 ± 0.32, and the combined sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing postoperative complications were 0.78 and 0.87, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92).ConclusionIn patients undergoing degenerative cervical spine surgery, higher C-VBQ scores were significantly associated with an increased risk of cage subsidence. The C-VBQ score is a reliable tool for preoperative bone quality assessment and serves as an independent predictor of cage subsidence risk following cervical spine surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251327381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11910744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251327381","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.ObjectivePoor bone quality is a major risk factor for complications after cervical spine surgery. The MRI-based cervical vertebral bone quality (C-VBQ) score is a reliable tool for assessing bone quality. This study systematically evaluates, for the first time, the predictive value of C-VBQ for cage subsidence risk in cervical spine surgery patients using meta-analysis.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of relevant literature in electronic databases up to October 16, 2024, to systematically assess the quality of included studies. Publication bias was evaluated by comparing C-VBQ between groups and calculating pooled sensitivity, specificity, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves.Results7 studies involving 681 patients were included. Using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool, the studies were deemed high quality with low risk of bias. High C-VBQ scores were significantly associated with fusion subsidence, with a pooled odds ratio of 2.98 (95% CI: 1.68-5.30). The C-VBQ cut-off value was 2.94 ± 0.32, and the combined sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing postoperative complications were 0.78 and 0.87, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92).ConclusionIn patients undergoing degenerative cervical spine surgery, higher C-VBQ scores were significantly associated with an increased risk of cage subsidence. The C-VBQ score is a reliable tool for preoperative bone quality assessment and serves as an independent predictor of cage subsidence risk following cervical spine surgery.

研究设计系统综述和荟萃分析。目的骨质差是颈椎手术后出现并发症的主要风险因素。基于磁共振成像的颈椎骨质(C-VBQ)评分是评估骨质的可靠工具。本研究首次采用荟萃分析法系统评估了C-VBQ对颈椎手术患者椎笼下沉风险的预测价值。方法我们全面检索了截至2024年10月16日的电子数据库中的相关文献,系统评估了纳入研究的质量。通过比较不同组间的 C-VBQ 并计算汇总的敏感性、特异性和汇总接收者操作特征曲线(SROC)来评估发表偏倚。采用诊断准确性研究质量评估 2 (QUADAS-2) 工具,这些研究被认为是高质量、低偏倚风险的研究。C-VBQ得分高与融合下沉显著相关,汇总的几率比为2.98(95% CI:1.68-5.30)。C-VBQ的临界值为2.94 ± 0.32,诊断术后并发症的综合灵敏度和特异度分别为0.78和0.87,曲线下面积为0.90(95% CI:0.87-0.92)。C-VBQ评分是术前骨质量评估的可靠工具,也是颈椎手术后椎笼下沉风险的独立预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信