Adrien Grancher, Ludivine Beaussire-Trouvay, Virginie Vernon, Marie Dutherage, Valérie Blondin, Caroline Elie, Karine Bouhier-Leporrier, Marie-Pierre Galais, Tifenn Clabaut, Anne-Laure Bignon, Aurélie Parzy, Alice Gangloff, Lilian Schwarz, Emilie Lévêque, Jean-Christophe Sabourin, Pierre Michel, Nasrin Vasseur, David Sefrioui, André Gilibert, Frédéric Di Fiore
{"title":"ctDNA variations according to treatment intensity in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer","authors":"Adrien Grancher, Ludivine Beaussire-Trouvay, Virginie Vernon, Marie Dutherage, Valérie Blondin, Caroline Elie, Karine Bouhier-Leporrier, Marie-Pierre Galais, Tifenn Clabaut, Anne-Laure Bignon, Aurélie Parzy, Alice Gangloff, Lilian Schwarz, Emilie Lévêque, Jean-Christophe Sabourin, Pierre Michel, Nasrin Vasseur, David Sefrioui, André Gilibert, Frédéric Di Fiore","doi":"10.1038/s41416-025-02971-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Circulating tumor DNA variations (∆ctDNA) were reported to be associated with treatment efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The present study evaluated ∆ctDNA according to first-line treatment intensity. Patients from two prospective ctDNA collections were divided into Group ≤ 2 drugs and Group ≥ 3 drugs. ∆ctDNA were analysed from baseline to cycle 3 or 4 (C3-4) according to three predefined subgroups: ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_ undetectable, ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_ detectable, and ∆ctDNA < 80%. Impact of ∆ctDNA on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed. Pretreatment ctDNA was detected in 129/152 (84.9%) of patients. A ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_undetectable was more frequent in Group ≥ 3 than ≤ 2 drugs (respectively 51.5% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.015). Patients with ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_undetectable had longer survival than other ∆ctDNA subgroups, in Group ≥ 3 drugs (mPFS 11.5 vs 7.8 vs 6.3 months, p = 0.02: mOS 30.2 vs 18.1 vs 16.4 month, p = 0.04) and in Group ≤ 2 drugs (mPFS 8.4 vs 6.0 vs 5.3 months, p = 0.05; mOS 29.6 vs 14.6 vs 14.6 months, p = 0.007). Early ∆ctDNA are associated to treatment intensity in first line mCRC with a significant impact on prognosis.","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":"132 9","pages":"814-821"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-025-02971-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA variations (∆ctDNA) were reported to be associated with treatment efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The present study evaluated ∆ctDNA according to first-line treatment intensity. Patients from two prospective ctDNA collections were divided into Group ≤ 2 drugs and Group ≥ 3 drugs. ∆ctDNA were analysed from baseline to cycle 3 or 4 (C3-4) according to three predefined subgroups: ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_ undetectable, ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_ detectable, and ∆ctDNA < 80%. Impact of ∆ctDNA on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed. Pretreatment ctDNA was detected in 129/152 (84.9%) of patients. A ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_undetectable was more frequent in Group ≥ 3 than ≤ 2 drugs (respectively 51.5% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.015). Patients with ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_undetectable had longer survival than other ∆ctDNA subgroups, in Group ≥ 3 drugs (mPFS 11.5 vs 7.8 vs 6.3 months, p = 0.02: mOS 30.2 vs 18.1 vs 16.4 month, p = 0.04) and in Group ≤ 2 drugs (mPFS 8.4 vs 6.0 vs 5.3 months, p = 0.05; mOS 29.6 vs 14.6 vs 14.6 months, p = 0.007). Early ∆ctDNA are associated to treatment intensity in first line mCRC with a significant impact on prognosis.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.